Concave Earth Questions by WildHeretic
Material originally sourced from the WildHeretic website which no longer in operation
All material below is credit to WildHeretic and has been recovered to share with the world. The data below is the opinion and research of an individual which may or may not be in agreement with the common concave earth understanding.
Introduction to CEQ
Below are articles on the common questions I and others get asked concerning the Concave Earth theory (CET). For us, this is a brand new theory (2013) catapulted to the forefront by Steven Christopher’s YouTube videos. So obviously we don’t have all the answers; nor do we agree unanimously on every single related topic. For many people, having an alternative explanation for the world around us is necessary before a new theory can be accepted regardless of any experimental proof. Phenomena need to be put in boxes for the mind.
The answers to the questions below are my opinions based on the online research I have so far carried out from 2013 till October 2015 – not anyone else’s theory or possible explanation, just my own. Steven has different answers to some of these questions, so he is worth a look at if you want as much choice as possible. They are not set on stone tablets as the commandments of wildheretic, but more like current ideas or possible (sometimes likely) explanations.
A couple of articles are only one or two sentences and are more redirects to another article. There is no point in repeating stuff. Other questions are quite large essays, especially the last one. If you have a question that is not answered below, please feel free to add it in the comment section and I will do my best to answer it.
Wild Heretic
Why can’t I see the other side if I look up?
Because light bends upwards towards the center of the Earth cavity. You could see the other side if you looked at the horizon (not upwards) with super sensitive eyes and lower frequencies of light which is what polar satellites have been theorized to do in a concave Earth.
All light bends up to the center of the cavity. Light rays further away from the source are “straighter”, but much weaker, and would require more sensitive equipment to detect.
How is there night and day?
The Sun is an artificial sulfur lamp which has a light side and a dark side. (https://web.archive.org/web/20221228212956/http://www.wildheretic.com/is-the-moon-an-optical-illusion/) (not exactly an optical illusion as the title suggests).
The Sun. 
A sulfur lamp.
How is the Sun powered?
The Sun is powered by an attractive magnetic field which I theorize ultimately comes from the holes near the poles. The Sun is made of an iron/nickel/cobalt alloy (invar) which is highly magnetic and easily induced (magnetically soft). This means that it changes its magnetic polarity to whatever is the polarity of the nearest magnetic field. This is Lenz’s law and creates a repulsion between the side of the Sun and the magnetic field from the Earth’s pole nearest to the Sun, causing the Sun to move up and down. This movement in a magnetic field is the basis of all modern electrical power generation – induction.
(Click to animate). The Sun moves up and starts to flip due an opposing magnetic field being induced on the side nearest to the magnetic field – eddy currents.
How do satellites work?
Nearly all satellites are either geostationary or polar orbiting. Geostationary satellites sit on the glass layer at roughly 100km altitude and are responsible for telecommunications and weather imagery amongst other purposes. This glass layer is covered in a very thin layer of ice/water and moves very slowly east to west and along the north-south axis. This causes geostationary satellites to move slowly away from their stationary position – Hohmann transfer orbit and inclined orbit. To correct this they need rocket boosters to glide across the ice/water layer. Because gravity’s push from the center is stronger (not weaker) in altitude, the glass layer will also rise and lower in elevation, i.e. oscillate. This could be the cause of differing air pressures in different regions of the cavity.
Polar satellites orbit around the pole, especially the south pole. They do not travel from the north to the south pole or vice verse. As they orbit around the south pole, the satellite itself rotates which gives us the strips or swaths of satellite imagery. Their orbit around the south pole is extremely tight in order to put them in the same axis as the Sun which rotates very close to the center. This makes them Sun-synchronous.
How polar satellites operate in a concave Earth, assuming what they tell us about satellites is true.
The altitude of polar satellites is completely unknown as the thermosphere and Van Allen belts which would limit altitude are either non-existent or much reduced in both the antarctic and arctic circle. The polar satellites levitation will be due to “magnetic drives” installed which repel the machine away from the north magnetic pole (geographic south pole), which is probably the hole near the south pole. One such possible drive has already been labelled on a Japanese satellite as an “ion engine”. This is the same principle as “lifters” – basically the Biefeld–Brown effect, developed in the 1920s. This effect was reported in 1957 to have advanced to the point of being able to reduce the weight of objects by 30%, whereby these “gravitators” became classified.
A Japanese exploratory satellite with an “ion engine”.
What about pictures from space?
Satellites don’t take photos like we do. They actually take horizontal strips of the Earth across a certain width which they compile together to form one long strip very roughly along the north/south axis. More strips are gathered over a few days and collated into one image of the Earth. These images are heavily tweaked to correct for alignment, oblique viewing (i.e. looking at the Earth close to the horizon), brightness, altitude, and other methods in Photoshop to produce an appealing Earth composite image (such as copy and pasting clouds).
These are the north/south axis strips from the Modis satellite collated together and arranged onto a flat map.
By collating and heavily rectifying strips, it is impossible to say what shape the Earth is. Any shape could be presented, and is.
(Click to animate). Wacky Blue Marble Earth has North America artificially curved around to make it look like a globe.
I could only find three images of the “globe” Earth which were said to have been taken with one shot, i.e. no composites: 1. The 1972 Apollo 17 missions. 2. The 1990 Galileo satellite images, and 3. The 2015 DISCOVR missions. There are some serious common sense issues with the moon landings and their images; and NOAA’s DISCOVR images are identical in shape and curve to GOES-13, which is a proven composite image. Both images don’t see above or below 75/80° latitude north and south and miss a large chunk of the Pacific ocean when capturing the “Earth’s rotation“. Even if these images of Earth are from one shot (they are not), you couldn’t tell the difference between an image of a concave Earth through a wide angle lens (3 minutes into the video) and one of a convex Earth a million miles away with a telescope.
The Earth looks like a convex ball… 
…until we see that really it was a model of a concave Earth.
(Click to animate). You can’t tell the difference between a convex ball and a concave bowl.
What causes Earthquakes?
Earthquakes are caused by the reverse piezoelectric effect from lightning strikes. Lightning strikes originate from the electrically charged Sun which continually charges the Earth with negative electricity creating an electric circuit within the Earth cavity.
Where does cosmic background radiation come from?
Radiowaves
Due to Lenz’s law, the Sun changes its magnetic polarity every 6 months. Therefore the polarity (direction) of the electric field (solar wind) also changes its direction perpendicular to this magnetic field. This alternating current produces radio waves, albeit extremely low frequency radio waves. It is basically an electromagnetic field changing direction every 6 months.
When a direct electrical current is applied to a wire the current flow builds an electromagnetic field around the wire. When the current is removed, the field collapses which again sends a wave. If the current is applied and removed over and over for a period of time, a series of waves is propagated at a discrete frequency. If the current changes polarity, or direction repeatedly, that could make waves, too. This phenomenon is the basis of electromagnetivity and basically describes how radio waves are created within transmitters.
When you slow down the frequency of an alternating current, you generate less and less strong radiowaves with a given conductor in which your current flows. And when you stop the current alternation all together, and have a DC current, you do NOT generate a radiowave anymore. What you now generate is a (weak) magnetic field, “attached” to the wire, and which won’t propagate.
An inductor (e.g. the Sun) can make a great radio wave transmitter:
Another way to make the field strong at 1/4-wave distance is to use a very small inductor, but crank up the inductor’s current to a much higher value. In this case even a very tiny coil could emit plenty of EM radiation.
Microwaves
The Sun can also produce microwaves. A microwave oven creates microwaves with a cavity magnetron: “A high-powered vacuum tube that generates microwaves using the interaction of a stream of electrons with a magnetic field while moving past a series of open metal cavities (cavity resonators). Bunches of electrons passing by the openings to the cavities excite radio wave oscillations in the cavity.” There looks to be a possible parallel with the Concave Earth system – stream of electrons is the solar wind, magnetic field is the cavity h-field, vacuum is the vacuum of space, and cavity is the Earth cavity.
Microwave ovens are basically accelerated radio wave machines that contain a concentrated radio frequency inside a chamber.
The solar wind accelerates the Sun’s 6-month oscillating magnetic field (super low frequency radio wave) in the Earth cavity (chamber). The super low frequency radio wave will nearly completely travel through the crust (this could be gravity), but a little bit still gets reflected and resonates inside the Earth cavity. Together with the solar wind, these back and forth reflections (oscillations) eventually creates the cosmic microwave background (CMB) which ranges from 0.3 GHz to 630 GHz. Anything above 300 GHz is said to be in the infra-red spectrum, so 630 GHz is only just in the very edge of infra-red.
The CMB is geocentric and has been nicknamed the “axis of evil“. This is because the CMB aligns with the ecliptic plane of our heliocentric “solar system” – the CMB is the entire “universe”, yet it aligns with the Earth/Sun on the equinoxes. This has been verified by three consecutive satellites (last one was in 2013) proving that this alignment is not a fluke due to faulty machinery. They say, “Why CMB patterns are oriented to the solar system is not at all understood at this time.” Yes it is understood. The Earth is concave. The ecliptic is the space between two attracting magnetic fields.
Nine frequencies of the cosmic background microwave radiation show concentrations along the ecliptic. 
This is the shape of the field holding sporadic meteorites in our “solar system”. It also has an ecliptic.
So, the CMB originally emanates from the Sun as super low frequency electromagnetic waves, which increase in frequency via the solar wind until the resonant 630 GHz frequency is reached.
Where is the ventilation system needed?
Earth can’t be a closed system, otherwise the heat from the Sun would slowly build up until it would be unbearable. There are two physical possibilities of ventilation: 1. The holes near the poles. If they exist, then obviously water and air comes in through the south pole hole and exits the northern one. These would conduct and convect the Sun’s heat out of the Earth.
(Click to animate). The north pole hole sucking in air and water?
2. The Earth’s crust could be quite porous. There are lots of known and unknown cave systems in the world, some of which have been nowhere near fully explored, i.e. nobody knows how far back they go. E.g. Mammoth Cave in Kentucky USA and has 400 miles (640 km) of surveyed passageways. If these caves exist in the ground above sea level, they are bound to also exist below sea level in the lakes, seas and oceans. Wind cave in western South Dakota has breezes which “can be strong enough to visibly stir nearby plants”. Maybe this windy cave is connected to the “outside” like the one from the Macuxi tribe tale.
3. There is a third possibility, but this is more in the realms of fringe science – other world portals, and/or vortices. There are stories of “cold spots” and “gravity anomalies” in certain areas that can’t be reasonably explained, such as the Oregon vortex.
Physical “impossibilities” exist in certain areas.
Vortices and other-world portals are associated heavily with US national parks (missing 411), the underworld stories, from ancient to modern, and haunted locations. Do they exist? Maybe. It would at least offer another possibility that in a few areas physical properties (such as heat) can be transferred inter-dimensionally.
How does gravity work?
In the concave Earth, gravity is an exact inversion of the mainstream model. Gravity is a push from the center of the cavity (or thereabouts). It offers the same square law and equatorial decrease as the main model. It is also supported by the Cavendish experiment, albeit with another equally valid interpretation – Bernoulli’s principle.
What is gravity?
The data below is the opinion and research of an individual which may or may not be in agreement with the common concave earth understanding.
Without having properly researched this, I have two hypothetical possibilities in the concave Earth – both involve the Sun’s electromagnetism.
1. Positive electric currents from the Sun. The Sun is negatively charged because it is inducting. This negative charge is traveling towards Earth and terminates as cloud-to-ground negative lightning. Because of this, the Earth is constantly negatively charged, but is releasing this negative charge upwards again through the atmosphere and back into space (possibly back towards the Sun).
Measurements have shown that the negative charge on earth remains roughly constant with time. At first glance, this fact is difficult to understand since the charge on earth is continuously leaking off into the conducting atmosphere. In fact, calculations show that if the earth’s charge were not being continuously re-supplied, the charge on earth would disappear in less than an hour.
The standard description of direct electric current tell us that a current through a wire goes in two directions. The negative “electrons” slowly travel one way and the positive current flow travels at the speed of light in the opposite direction.
So although electrons would flow from negative to positive, by convention (agreement), physicists refer to conventional current as a flow from high potential/voltage (positive) to low potential/voltage (negative)… Electrons move from areas where there are excess of negative charges to areas where there are a deficiency (or positive charge). Electrons move from “-” to “+”, but conventional current is considered to move in the other direction. When you set up a circuit, conventional current is considered to move from the “+” to the “-” side.
So logically, as the negative current (“electrons”) is constantly moving upwards through the atmosphere back towards the center of the cavity, positive current is constantly traveling at the speed of light in the opposite direction towards the Earth from the center (probably the Sun). Circling, around the positive current is the magnetic field.
It would be the magnetic field around the positive current flow from Sun to crust that is gravity.
2. Ridiculously low-frequency electromagnetic radiation from the charged Sun. The once-every-6-months alternating electromagnetic field of the Sun produces an extremely weak ridiculously low frequency radio wave. If 1Hz is a super extreme low frequency radio wave and is one full cycle per second, then the Sun’s EM wave would be one full cycle per 1 year. Over 365 days of 24 hours this is 31,536,000 seconds which is 0.0000000317Hz (3.17 x 10-8Hz).
This kind of low frequency would easily be able to penetrate water and rock for considerable distances since even ELF (3 to 30Hz) radio waves can “penetrate seawater, which makes them useful in communication with submarines… ELF waves can also penetrate significant distances into earth or rock, and “through-the-earth” underground mine communication systems use frequencies of 300 to 3000 Hz.”
Gravity is also said to be an extremely low energy force compared to the normal frequencies of EM radiation, which fits this frequency – 1042 times weaker supposedly. The lower the frequency of light, the less energy it has. Light is said to travel in a spiral movement – circular polarization. Controversial gravity waves are also supposed to spiral towards the Earth according to south polar scientists – “Gravitational waves from inflation generate a faint but distinctive twisting pattern in the polarization of the cosmic microwave background, known as a “curl” or B-mode pattern.” 0.0000000317Hz would be extremely faint if not nearly undetectable. Interestingly, “gravitational waves are expected to have frequencies of 10-16 to 104Hz.”
Also, a supposed “government insider” has researched this topic and come to a similar conclusion that gravity is “magnetic and created through the energy of the Sun. The magnetic properties of the light coming from the Sun is actually what creates gravity as we know it”.
This theory is similar to the Le Sage particle gravity offshoots of the 19th and early 20th centuries. In 1748 Le Sage envisioned gravity as a stream of corpuscles emanating from mass.
According to this model, any two material bodies partially shield each other from the impinging corpuscles, resulting in a net imbalance in the pressure exerted by the impact of corpuscles on the bodies, tending to drive the bodies together.
This is in quasi-similar territory to the Bernoulli principle interpretation of the Cavendish experiment, except in a concave Earth there are no gravity particles or waves emanating from mass, but from the central Sun instead (if you can call such a low frequency a “wave”). After reading that wiki page, it looks like the Le Sage theory and its variations have continued to fail because of those two assumptions that gravity is an attractive force and that it originates from mass. Those assumptions are taken as fact purely because the heliocentric model was taken as fact also. (See how the well was poisoned from the start). If a house is built on faulty foundations, it will never continue to stand up.
The closest Le Sage interpretation to this concave Earth gravitational theory came from Thomas Tommasina and Charles F. Brush in the early 20th century:
Unlike Lorentz and Thomson, Thomas Tommasina[38] between 1903 and 1928 suggested long wavelength radiation to explain gravity, and short wavelength radiation for explaining the cohesive forces of matter. Charles F. Brush[39] in 1911 also proposed long wavelength radiation. But he later revised his view and changed to extremely short wavelengths.
Tommasina’s short wavelength radiation explanation for elemental/molecular bonding is a good one to explore also considering the new interpretation of the Gerlach experiment which has matter as consisting of very fast alternating magnetic fields (which of course produces shorter wave radiation).
Since the magnetic field of the Sun alternates every 6 months, we can hardly call this a wave (from our own perception living in the Earth) and more like gravity as a compression from the Sun’s magnetic field – super penetrative, extremely weak, obeys the square law, and originates from about the center of the cavity. It would be interesting to see if there are any very slight seasonal variations in gravity as the Sun moves very slightly away and to the center of the Earth cavity throughout the year. This applies to night and day where gravity should be very slightly stronger during the night because the Sun is very slightly nearer to the crust at night. Could this be measured?
This is probably my favourite candidate out of the two gravitational theories proposed so far.
Can this theory make predictions?
Yes, but at the moment they are limited in scope due to the freshness of the theory. When people ask this question, they mean can it predict astronomical phenomena like: the position of the Sun in the sky, asteroids, comets, stars (celestial sphere), planets, the moon, eclipses and such like?
Sun: Predicting the Sun’s position throughout the year has already been calculated in a concave Earth, as well as its actual location, material make-up, and mechanism. I concentrated on the Sun first as this object is primary to life and the creator of nearly all of the “unresolved forces” of the Earth. Its importance cannot be understated. The night sky is largely irrelevant to this theory, unlike the mainstream model of a vast universe.
Asteroids: These can also be predicted because thanks to radar we know their locations relative to the Sun. Their inclinations and speeds can be predicted in the concave Earth because the model theorizes that the Earth is held together by two attracting magnetic fields. These magnetic primer fields show the asteroids’ (meteoroids’) shape and orientation. For example, the closer the asteroids are to the poles, the steeper their inclination will be because they are being held by the “cone” vortex of the magnetic primer field. NASA thinks the same:
“The fourth and least understood source is the Asteroidal source. Observed asteroidal meteoroids are predicted to have inclinations close to the ecliptic poles, at about ±90º, in the apex direction.”
The asteroidal source are the areas closest to the poles.
Comets: (Please read Primer fields, meteoroids and the Sun to understand this properly). I haven’t looked at comets; however my guess would be that the movement of comets in the mainstream model to be very similar in a concave Earth, just the distances and speeds would be much reduced. My model is actually very heliocentric in that the Sun is placed in the center of the Earth cavity. The Sun is in (very near) the center and the comets move around the Sun in an ellipsis of relative inclination (angle), size and distance. The common ones moving elliptically around the magnetic field cones of the north and south apex and the north and south toroidal. The comets closer to the center (north and south apex) or the ecliptic (helion and anti-helion) will be less inclined and less elliptical.
A cross-section of a cone is an elliptical orbit. 
Two attracting magnetic fields (primer fields) put together show the magnetic cone fields (and octahedron shape) in the middle.
These comets have most of their trajectories further away from the center and so orbit the center at a much slower speed. If the Sun is about at 0.80º from the center and orbits every 24 hours, then a comet orbiting around 50º from the center may take years or decades. Then there is the factor of the electrical Earth cavity slowing or speeding up the comet in some way.
Radar images of meteoroids positioned around the Sun show the cone/octahedron 
The names given to the different source areas of meteoroids. The Sun is in the center of the graph.
Perhaps when it passes close to the Sun, it becomes more charged due to the solar wind and emits an electrical discharge (tail), or it heats up more and some of the iron/nickel alloy evaporates into a gas and becomes like plasma.
Stars/planets/moon: These objects don’t need a model to predict their whereabouts and/or phases. They are observed night after night, year after year. This data can be entered into a computer program like Stellarium. In fact, the moon phases are not 100% predictable even today.
The three quarter moon should appear 7 days after a full moon according to the mainstream model, yet there is often a 1 day irregularity with the three-quarter moon appearing 6 or sometimes 8 days later instead. This means the moon has an irregular speed (elliptical orbit?).
Eclipses: I haven’t looked into these at all in terms of their regularity, so I cannot predict them.
What are the astronomical bodies?
Sun: As already mentioned, the Sun’s light is very nearly the same as a sulfur lamp and meteors show the Sun to be composed primarily of an iron/nickel alloy with a smidgen of cobalt thrown in (invar?). Therefore the Sun is an inducting light bulb.
Moon: At the moment my best guess is that the moon is the back of the Sun. It has the same analemma as the Sun (figure of 8 in the sky over the year), it is roughly the same size, we never get to see the other side of the moon, and light reflections show that the moon is possibly concave therefore the Sun is convex in order to distribute the light more.
The moon isn’t in the exact opposite side of the sky to the Sun all the time throughout the year, but light doesn’t bend upwards as much at night and also varies seasonally which may give a skewered perception of the moon’s apparent position. The different phases of the moon are probably caused by the gegenschein, which is the dark spot of reflected sunlight at the back of the Sun.
Eclipse: I don’t know what causes this. One guess: Because light bends, the Sun’s light also reflects off its backside (the moon). This reflected light also bends in a similar way to the Sun’s own light during the day and so will reflect back on to the front of the Sun and so on. The dark spot (gegenschein) of the moon’s light may be what obscures the Sun.
However, there is a balloon video showing the 14th November 2012 solar eclipse in Australia at 37km altitude where the Sun’s light (radial brightness) is reduced, but far from blocked. Even videos of the March 2015 solar eclipse filmed from a passenger jet shows a reduction in sunlight, but again, not blocked. This points to a solar eclipse being a low altitude phenomenon in some way.
The Sun’s light is merely dampened at 37km, not blocked. 
The Sun’s light is slightly more reduced at 11km, but not blocked at this altitude.
Meteoroids/asteroids/comets: These are bits of the Sun ejected by electrical surges. Therefore they consist of the same elements as iron meteorites, but super hot.
Galaxies: There is a possibility that space isn’t a vacuum, but was instead filled with argon gas. A sulfur lamp filament surrounds itself with argon gas, so maybe the Sun’s engineers did the same. Argon is the first noble gas molecules found in space in the Crab Nebula. In their theory this is a star that went “poof” a thousand years ago. It is understandable that hydrogen and helium are there (lightest gases), but not argon. What’s the bets that this formed when hydrogen seeped through a meteorite-made hole in the glass and mixed with the noble gas much higher up in the cavity to form argon hydride. Argon may not be such an unreactive gas in the charged thermosphere perhaps.
The crab nebula formed when heated and charged argon gas mixed with light hydrogen gas from the Earth’s atmosphere.
Yes, the crab nebula isn’t a galaxy, but some of them look similar and to be made of gas. Most galaxies are also spiral shaped. Maybe the center is a meteoroid which has gained an electric field (solar wind) therefore also experiences electrical surges which throws out tiny parts from it. These tiny parts follow the star’s field.
Why do only relatively few stars/asteroids gain electric fields to become “galaxies”? Super hot metal is not supposed to be able to have an electric current (highly resistant); however, if the highly reflective shreibersite layer is still on the outside of the iron/nickel meteoroid/star, or actually consists of pure schreibersite only, then these stars will reflect the sunlight away, reducing their temperature enough to form its own electric current as it moves through the cavity’s magnetic field. So galaxies would be bits of the Sun with a low enough temperature to gain an electric field. These galaxies have probably also reacted with hydrogen/argon etc. as well to form gases.
A spiral galaxy (M101) is a star with an electric field (solar wind).
Don’t forget, these pictures from telescopes have been extremely enhanced and aren’t the real deal.
Planets: I don’t know what they are. I would imagine these orbit much like the mainstream model, but circular orbits, not elliptical (most of the time). They would orbit the Sun roughly along the ecliptic (the central flat plane) which is where the two attracting magnetic fields meet. Maybe the planets are made of gas but have been pressurized and condensed due to being wedged in the middle of the two attracting magnetic fields? They take between 88 days and 165 years to orbit the Sun, so they are probably fairly far out from the center.
All the planets sometimes exhibit retrograde motion. This is when one of the planets stops and reverses direction then stops and continues its orbit once again, i.e. it does a loop in the sky over a few months. I don’t know why, but I would guess it is because when this planet is moving below (or above) the ecliptic plane it isn’t so tightly wedged between the two magnetic fields of the Earth cavity. Therefore it would have a tendency to follow the magnetic field “cone” down (or up) changing its angle (inclination) and have one elliptical orbit around the cone over a few months before it returns to its location along the ecliptic and carries on as before.
(Click to animate). The planet inclines down the cone and back up again before continuing its circular orbit along the ecliptic – retrograde motion.
Stars: Like meteoroids and asteroids, stars are exactly the same thing – bits of the Sun ejected due to electrical surges. The only difference is their location. I have two possible ideas: 1. They tightly and very slowly orbit the Sun in the same direction it is rotating in the cavity because they are caught in the Sun’s electromagnetic field. This very slow orbiting around the Sun allows them to move 4 minutes faster than the Sun’s rotation – a sidereal day (23 hr 56 min). 2. They are on the boundaries of the two toroidal attracting magnetic fields (the nutshell) which is quite a distance from the Sun in the center. If they were this far out, I can’t see them orbiting faster than the Sun, so I’m not partial to this idea.
Why don’t asteroids fall to the Earth because of push gravity?
Because the cavity is electrically super-charged and super-hot. The extremely hot and partially evaporated “bits of the Sun” and the gas planets probably act more like plasma in an attracting magnetic field.
Very high temperatures are usually needed to sustain ionization, which is a defining feature of a plasma… Even a partially ionized gas in which as little as 1% of the particles are ionized can have the characteristics of a plasma (i.e., response to magnetic fields and high electrical conductivity).
I would guess that the movement inside the Earth cavity surrounding the Sun is based on plasma physics.
What is on the outside?
Nobody knows, but there are clues in anecdotal accounts of those who are said to have ventured beyond. These accounts are nearly taken as fiction, although stated by the authors as fact. You can find the accounts in the Holes near the poles article.
Through the northern hole we have another similar world with a different type of Sun, much larger lifeforms, giant people, and 24-hour daylight. Both holes and at least one cave in the Amazon jungle are supposed to connect to this world.
24-hour daylight means that the other world isn’t the convex side of the Earth, yet the two poles are connected. In a physical 3D model of the universe, maybe the Earth and the giant world are like neurons of a brain and that there are lots of other neurons all connected to each other with magnetic current (aether) flowing through the whole system.
Neurons
The 3D model may be the wrong way to look at this. It could be that the holes near the poles are vortices which act as inter-dimensional portals. Invisible vortices could also exist naturally elsewhere throughout the Earth, but the poles would contain the biggest two, and not all portals connect to the giant world. For example, supposedly four American girls in 1972 found themselves driving into another world inhabited by non-humans who drove electric car-like vehicles – Gadianton Canyon. There are plenty of anecdotal stories of time anomalies, unknown landscapes and lots of other glitches to give this idea some credence. The giants living in the world through the Amazon cave said to the Indians left behind that they could live in the giant world after they die. This points to another-dimensional aspect, rather than a physical rock-Swiss-cheese model that the Nazis had envisaged.
The deepest hole is the Kola Superdeep Borehole dug by the Russians. They got to 12,262 metres before they could grind no further due to the rock becoming considerably hotter (180 °C) and more plastic-like, i.e. the rock flowed back into the hole when the drill bit was taken out.
The Kola Borehole now capped.
William Morgen (Etidorpha) ventured deep underground and did not experience treacle rock or a hotter atmosphere, but a world between death and life or a quasi-spirit world instead. On reaching this state of being he was able to appear to the publisher of the book at will and become invisible as well. This again points to an inter-dimensional aspect, rather than a physical “I-am-here-and-you-are-there” universe. Is the spirit world the aether fluid between the synapses, or is that analogy too primitive when attempting an inter-dimensional model? Perhaps a virtual world existing on a computer server might be a slightly better example? I don’t know to be honest.
Isn’t this a conspiracy too far?
Unfortunately, the core tenets of this reality isn’t based on whether we like it or not. The above question is really one of belief or rather disbelief. An international “conspiracy”of some sort is already proven regarding the US and China. There are bubbles of proof.
(Click to animate). I’m forever blowing bubbles – and so is my scuba diving colleague. 
(Click to animate). China saw how successful America was deceiving its “ever-busy-working-3-jobs-a-day” public and thought “Hey, most of our population are slaves too. They’ll fall for this memorizing bullshit without thinking twice – they don’t have time to think.”
The above footage (and more) shows that there is a deliberate intention to defraud or deceive the public. The space industry has a marketing department created to sell to the public a fabricated image of what the industry really does. Everybody (including you) living today derives their existence by selling their talents/services/goods etc. to somebody else. Everybody is offering something to somebody to keep themselves alive. Even those benefiting from socialism have appointed politicians to sell welfare to the tax payers on their behalf. Really socialism is just a bribe from a morally lazy government selling itself to the public to tax you to death to pay itself and its creditors. There are no rights on being told the truth and informing one another truthfully. When everything is a great sell, don’t expect the news agencies/government/companies/academics or even your friendly neighbour to inform you on what is going on. They may, or they may not, but the well is poisoned from the get-go, simply because they have to survive like the rest of us.
This is especially true of the military. In fact we expect the exact opposite of truthful information from them. Why? Simple. The purpose of the military is to have the advantage over everyone else, especially those they may perceive as competitors or enemies. To do that, their ideal situation is for them to be fully informed and everyone else dis-informed. The quote below by the then-Director of the CIA in 1981, William Casey, is a true one apparently.
Now we understand the motive of this “space deception”… at least in part.
This quote was witnessed by Barbara Honegger who was Assistant to the chief domestic policy adviser to the President. She was at an…
“…early February 1981 meeting of the newly elected President Reagan with his new cabinet secretaries to report to him on what they had learned about their agencies in the first couple of weeks of the administration. Reagan asked what he saw as his goal as director for the CIA, to which he replied with this quote, which I recorded in my notes of the meeting as he said it. Shortly thereafter I told Senior White House correspondent Sarah McClendon, who was a close friend and colleague, who in turn made it public.”
NASA has very strong links to the military as is evident by the medals they award. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) which sends up geostationary weather satellites won’t give GOP internal docs on climate research despite being subpoenaed to do so. The reasons given are because of “confidentiality concerns and the integrity of the scientific process.” They are selling you global warming. The well is poisoned. These organizations CANNOT be trusted. If you have no trust, what do you have? Nothing. The entire fabric of civilization is based on it. Every one of the zillions of personal contracts made every day is based on trust. Without it, we are literally animals and must go back to living in trees or in the dirt foraging for food (not an exaggeration at all when you think it through).
The space industry could be very compartmentalized with the left hand not knowing what the right one is doing; and/or those that must be in the know have to sign confidentiality agreements. We know there are international agreements on some level as lots of nations have bases on Antarctica and the revolving ISS actornauts are often international. The last and most obvious question you probably have right now is “why?”.
Why hide the concave earth?
Why hide the fact of a concave Earth? There are some practical and also some, more esoteric, possibilities as to why they are conspiring to portray a vast universe. I have come up with a few ideas; maybe you can think of some more. If so, then don’t forget to add them to the comments section below. (These theories have been split up into 10 pages for easy download.)
1. Trust theory
2. Religious theory
3. Economic control theory
4. Curiosity containment theory
5. Prison theory
6. Farm theory
7. Battery theory
8. Game theory
9. Womb theory
10. Library theory
Conclusion
1. Trust theory
For whatever reason at the time, the decision was made long ago to hide the fact of the concave Earth by a group of men sitting around a table. The trouble with lying is that unless you continue to lie, your reputation is shattered. The consequences for a lack of faith (trust) are dire. So, to uphold their trust (or contract) with the public, they (i.e. the Church) must continue to lie forever more. A lot of people in these organizations may be sick and tired of the charade, but the lying has gone on for so long that billions and trillions of dollars and a lot of careers are based on it. These industries range from the obvious ones like the space industry to some areas of the sciences and academics and even Hollywood, the press, and some areas of government. The heliocentric model is the basis of a lot of money and a large chunk of industry. It has to keep going to keep the wolf from the door.