Do We Live Within? The Hollow Earth Theory - Thesis Michael Rippert & Martin Straube

[ConcaveEarth.net]

Thesis prepared by Michael Rippert & Martin Straube for the subject of physics
MStraubeHw@gmx.de
Translated to English

We were supervised by
the specialist teacher Mr. Kase
Deadline: March 28, 2005

foreword

“Every child knows that the earth is round.”

Everyone starts arguing with this or similar sentences when confronted with the Earth-world theory. How could one claim in such an absurd and profane way that the Earth is a hollow sphere and that we live on the inside of it? Those who claim something like this probably have a “broken optics” or are probably “crazy”. Marcus Haas even claims that “The fact that some world views […] persist among some people is […] due to a lack of understanding that blinds them […]”. Unfortunately, Mr. Haas seems to forget that, in contrast to the Copernican world view, there is some fundamental evidence that reinforces the inner world view. The Copernicanists wait in vain for proof that the Earth is a solid sphere.

This idea of ​​​​the earthly world has not only existed for a short time, but has already found its way into ancient cultures and religions.

The Bible speaks of the “ocean above the vault of heaven” as do other cultures. In ancient Indian cosmology it says: “The world or the Brahma egg is a huge spherical cavity.” Even the ancient Greek philosopher Plato reports in his Critias: “[…] He therefore gathered all the gods in their most venerable abode, which lies in the middle of the universe […]”. If the universe expands to infinity according to today’s understanding, where exactly is the center that represents the “most venerable abode”?

These quotes are not intended to represent evidence, but to point to the origins of the hollow earth theory, which is based on other evidence and which will be adequately addressed in this paper.

2

Even in its early days, one is literally “bombarded” with the ideas of the Copernicanists and has no other possibility to form one’s own opinion, since there is only one prevailing opinion. Countless textbooks and specialist journals represent today’s prevailing “explanations” and do not mention anything about the existing contradictions in the Copernican world view - everything is hushed up.

For many people, the idea of ​​​​living on the inside of an earth seems paradoxical and illogical. One critic states that a curvature at the top must be visible. However, such and other comments suggest that the person has not spent even a single second thought about the theory. It would be unthinkable if the earth world theory did not provide explanations and proofs for such mundane claims.

Other questions that will surely pop into your head as a result of this confrontation are perhaps why the Earth appears as a sphere in satellite images or how the horizon is formed. How does a universe of such dimensions fit into such a small Earth? How are we kept on this Earth? How do day and night and the seasons come about? If the Earth is a hollow sphere, what is outside? How do the phases of the moon come about?

These and certainly some other elementary questions will be answered in this paper.

However, the most important question that one should actually ask oneself as a supporter of today’s world view is the one that Johannes Lang writes as a title on the first page of his book:

“Has the Copernican system been proven?”

This question therefore forms the basis of the thesis and is intended to bring the aforementioned earth world theory closer to the bottom.

3

outline

1st Prelude

1.1 A comparison - worldview or worldview

1.2 Significant worldviews from antiquity to modern times

1.2.1 Antiquity – Claudius Ptolemy

1.2.2 Middle Ages – The Biblical Worldview

1.2.3 Modern Times - Sir Isaac Newton

2. Nicolaus Copernicus – The Heliocentric Worldview

2.1 Structure, functionality and current assumptions

2.2 The Straightness of Light

2.3 Some size comparisons

2.4 Unexplained phenomena and absurdities

2.5 Is Copernicus proven?

3. The Earth-World Theory – An Introduction

3.1 Basic principles

3.2 Conceptions of the Earth World

3.3 Reality or just an unreal thought?

4. Evidence supporting the Hollow Earth

4.1 Proof of the curvature of light

4.2 Proof of the stationary earth

4.3 UG Morrow – The Rectilineator

4.4 The Sailing Ship Experiment

4.5 The diverging solders in multiple execution

4.6 Infrared images

5. Structure and Functioning of the Earth

5.1 The general mechanical force theory

5.2 The World Ether – The Electron Sea

5.3 Magnetism and Electricity

5.4 Formation of the horizon

5.5 Sun, Moon and other planets

5.6 The Origin of Day and Night

4

5.7 The Origin of the Seasons

5.8 Moon phases, lunar and solar eclipses

5.9 Circulation of celestial bodies

5.10 How does the entire universe fit into the hollow earth?

5.11 What is outside?

6. Unexplained phenomena of the Copernican physicists clarified

6.1 The Fata Margona

6.2 The radio phenomena

6.3 Earth’s magnetism

6.4 Tides

7. Own experiments and tests

7.1 Experiment to determine the curvature of light

7.2 Construction of a hollow earth half

7.3 Infrared images

8. Rolf Keppler – descendant of Johannes Kepler

8.1 Biography

8.2 Interview

8.3 Questions about the Earth-world theory and answers

9th Coda

9.1 Evaluation of the survey

9.2 Current fictitious status assuming the Earth world

9.3 Conclusion

10th Appendix

10.1 Survey on the Hollow Earth Theory

10.2 Survey diagrams

10.3 Further Poetry on the Earth-World Theory

10.4 Source reference

[ConcaveEarth.net]

1st Prelude

1.1 A comparison – worldview or worldview

Even if worldview and worldview begin with the same root in their pure wording, they are still different and cannot be separated so far from each other.

Just as every person is an individual, they also have their own subjective worldview that helps them understand their environment and influences their actions. It is the sum of experiences, knowledge and beliefs as well as insights and experiences in which facts and truths are mixed together. The worldview is often related to an individual science and can therefore also be described as “homo-academic”. Physics, biology and astronomy therefore have their own worldviews that often come into conflict with one another and thus cause contradictions.

In physics, combined with astronomy, the world view is based primarily on theoretical physics - the theory of relativity and quantum physics. The pursuit of clarity is ultimately the reason why people want to create a “picture of the world” and thus a world view.

On the other hand, the worldview provides a comprehensive concept between man and the universe and, moreover, their mutual relations to each other. A worldview encompasses all existing opinions as a totality of human existence and is “polyacademic” 1 . This means that a worldview is composed of science, politics, economics, ecology, morality, etc. It is the fundamental concept that reflects how the world is structured, that it cannot be unhinged.

6

if, thus enabling us to live and, what’s more, can also have a prophetic effect.

The current worldview also represents the framework of today’s education - all textbooks are based on its findings. The task of a worldview, however, is more to legitimize certain forms of power and thus to explain the origin and basis of power. A worldview is thus given the function of initiating discussions, destroying them or preventing them.

For some time now, a new, innovative worldview has existed that seeks to completely overturn the Copernican system and is therefore also referred to as the Earth-world theory. The current worldview may be represented everywhere, but in some areas, especially in physics and astronomy, it has deficits that lack evidence. So often in history, incorrectly correct assumptions, such as blood circulation, have been suppressed and suppressed by the generally prevailing doctrine.

The same applies to the Earth world theory, which is still suppressed by the Copernicanists today, as they are in the absolute majority. The fact is that what was always initially assumed to be false, ultimately turned out to be a step closer to the truth. In any case, there is some evidence for the Earth world that speaks against the Copernican world view.

At the moment, the Earth-world theory is still a “new world view” which, however, can become a world view through recognition and expansion if only people would finally abandon empiricism and recognize the truth.

“Anyone who only associates with like-minded people overlooks the rough edges of his worldview.”

7

1.2.1 Antiquity – Claudius Ptolemy

Ptolemy was the last great astronomer of antiquity. According to him, the earth is firmly at the center of the universe. All other celestial bodies - the moon, sun, planets and stars - move in circular orbits around this center, which are considered to be perfect. Ptolemy also noticed that the planets make unexplained loops. In order to reconcile this astronomical observation with the geocentric system, it was necessary to have all celestial bodies make further circles around this orbit - so-called epicycles - and sometimes also orbits around these orbits again. By using around 80 such orbits, Ptolemy was able to reconcile the observations of the planetary loops with his model.

The Ptolemaic world view was also superior in the accuracy of its orbit predictions to the heliocentric world view of Nicolaus Copernicus, which falsely assumed that the planets orbited the sun in circular orbits. It was only Kepler’s discovery that the planets orbit the sun in ellipses that led to a more accurate model and ultimately to the general acceptance of the Copernican world view. Claudius Ptolemy’s calculation methods were extremely precise, for a long time even more precise than Kepler’s, and their basic idea as a calculation method was also correct, but not in their philosophical interpretation that everything revolves around the earth as the center.

The breakthrough and success of Kepler’s calculations was due less to the fact that the sun and no longer the earth was the center of the movements, but to the fact that Kepler no longer used elliptical orbits and not circular orbits, which led to a greater agreement with the actual planetary data measured by Tycho Brahe and later Galileo.

8

1.2.2 Middle Ages – The Biblical Worldview

The Biblical worldview is probably the one that has had, or still has, the most followers for the longest time. All people who belong to one of the three major world religions - Christianity, Judaism, Islam - believe that everything that exists was created by a great power - God. The Bible describes the history of the creation of the world in detail. Christians and Jews believe that God created the earth and all living things in seven days. On the first day, God created heaven and earth, light and darkness, and day and night. On the second day, God placed the sky between the water. On the third day, He created the continents and called them earth, and the accumulation of water He called the sea. He then created the flora of the earth. On the fourth day, God created the times of day and seasons, the sun, the moon, and the stars. On the fifth day, He created sea creatures and birds and commanded them to reproduce. On the sixth day, God created the animal world on land and, last but not least, man, who is the measure of all things. God made the seventh and last day a day of rest - today’s Sunday

Modern worldviews and above all the findings of science rule out the correctness of this theory of the origin of the earth almost 100 percent. However, the original story could not be definitely refuted. Nevertheless, a passage in the Bible with regard to the inner worldview caught our attention. In the Old Testament, in the first book of Moses, in the first chapter, verses six to eight, it says: “And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters […] And God made the firmament, and divided the waters that were under the firmament from the waters that were above the firmament […] And God called the firmament Heaven.” We asked several theologians about the meaning of these words. We received the answer that this firmament actually refers to the celestial structure that the

9

Rainwater that comes from above is held back so that it does not fall continuously onto the earth. However, this has not been recorded in writing and is therefore only an interpretation of the words. It occurred to us that this solid could also refer to the sphere of fixed stars described in the hollow earth theory. The two “waters” that were separated by the solid are two oceans facing each other. Another parallel can be drawn in relation to the significance of the earth in the two worldviews. In the biblical worldview, the earth is the center of everything that exists. Living beings live on the earth and the celestial bodies hang in the sky, which is above the earth. In the theory that we want to examine in more detail, the earth plays an equally important role. Here, everything is centered in the earth. However, it is not the earth that is in the middle, but the sphere of fixed stars. Furthermore, both theories speak of an existing “power”. In the Bible, it is God who simply created everything, and in the hollow earth theory, it is also a higher intelligence that is responsible for life and provides the energy needed in the world. The primal force that keeps the processes going and could also make it possible to generate usable energy also plays a very important role. Despite the similarities mentioned, we assume that the theory of creation described by the Bible cannot be correct, since most natural laws, such as reproduction, the weather or humans, were not given or created by God, but were brought about by nature and its long period of development. It is therefore unlikely that what is written in the Bible is correct. Whether the hollow earth theory is right or wrong cannot be said. However, it can be confirmed with great certainty that the Copernican system, as we know it and as we are taught it in school, is wrong. Why this is so will be explained later in this paper.

10

1.2.3 Modern Times – The Acentric Worldview

Atomic physics finally made it possible to explain the origin of solar energy. As a result, all the gods were banished from heaven. In the 19th century, three more planets were discovered - Neptune, Uranus and Pluto, and another 60 moons. In total, our solar system has 16 large moons, all of which have a diameter of more than a thousand kilometers. The planets - currently ten with Quaoar - do not orbit the sun in circular orbits, but in elliptical orbits together with their satellites - moons. The entire system has a diameter of around 10 billion kilometers, with the sun at its center. It has been calculated that the sun will shine for another four to five billion years. After that, it will dissolve into a firestorm and destroy all life on earth.

According to current understanding, our universe is a large cluster of galaxies, several billion kilometers in diameter. There is talk of a fourth dimension, which is located in the expansion of space, time and the world, but has not yet been fully explored. The universe is estimated to be 14 to 15 billion years old, and everything began with a big bang, namely the Big Bang.

This worldview is the one we are taught in school today. The basis of today’s acentric worldview is the straightness of light and a constant speed of light in space. However, it must be stressed at this point that this is only an assumption. To date, no one has “dared” to measure the speed of light in space. Why not? Are people afraid of the result that will then “come to light”? If light did not have a speed of 300,000 kilometers per second, the acentric and thus also the Copernican worldview would be wrong - and what then?

11

2. Nicolaus Copernicus – The Heliocentric Worldview

2.1 Basic principles

In the 16th century, Copernicus’ world view replaced all previous ideas. In this world view, the sun is placed at the center of the universe. Therefore, all planets - including the earth, which was the point of criticism for the church - orbit the sun and not the sun and the other planets orbit the earth. Even the sphere of fixed stars was included here. The retrograde movements of some planets could now be explained precisely. The dimensions of the earth’s orbit, in contrast to the fixed stars, are considered to be vanishingly small.

This worldview is the starting point of modern astronomy. But this too is now considered outdated, since the universe, according to today’s understanding, has no fixed center. It must be mentioned, however, that Copernicus was not the first to assume that the sun is the center. The idea of ​​​​such a worldview already existed in ancient times. It was the Pythagoreans who had already shown such progress at that time. But apparently no one wanted to believe them at the time. Nevertheless, several people in ancient times represented this idea, such as Heracleides Ponticus. However, this worldview did not initially prevail because the Ptolemaic one was simply too widespread. The fear of being brought to court for one’s opposing views also played a major role. Any attack on the geocentric worldview of the church was an attack on the authority of the Bible. Even Galileo felt this when he tried to spread the teachings of Copernicus and thus had to “serve” his lifelong house arrest.

12

2.2 The Straightness of Light

The heading “The straightness of the light ray” was deliberately avoided here, because mathematically and geometrically a ray is a straight line that extends from a point to infinity. Accordingly, a “straight light ray”, as one incorrectly reads in some textbooks, is actually wrong. Be that as it may, based on our perception we assume that light spreads in a straight line and thus the “light ray” model is generally valid. For example, if we stand in the forest in the morning and the air is still partially saturated with water, we can see this property of light very clearly. With the help of this model, even refraction, reflection and the creation of images can be justified. The Copernican world view and thus all of the astronomers’ distance measurements are based on the assumption of the straightness of light.

But there is no need to go into detail, because the eye is the actual reason for the assumption that light is a straight beam. The brain is a masterpiece of nature in itself, but even this masterpiece, despite all its perfection, is unable to perceive light curves, because it is impossible to trace such a curve. As soon as the eye registers light at a particular angle of incidence, the light beam is extended in a straight line, leading to the assumption that light is straight. Another problem with Copernican measurements is that they continue to assume that light travels at a speed of around 300,000 kilometers per second, creating incredible distances of several light years, which ultimately fulfill the current world view.

13

2.3 Some size comparisons

The Copernican universe is huge and its extent is a number in meters that begins with one and ends with 26 zeros. Anyone who wants to read this number out to us is welcome to do so, but they should also answer the question of what they imagine it to be. This really “small” number is just to get you in the mood for the topic.

Our vaunted solar system has an incredible size of around one billion kilometers. If we now reduce the size of the entire system so that around 12,742 kilometers correspond to one centimeter, we get an idea of ​​​​it that is comprehensible to the human mind. Under these conditions, the Earth would be one centimeter in size and its distance from the sun would now be a full 11.7 meters. The sun, for its part, would be just one meter in size. Jupiter’s distance from the central star would already be around 600 meters. Pluto, as the outermost planet, would then be 4.6 kilometers away, which is roughly the distance from Wittenberg to Eutzsch. One might ask oneself whether such a sun would still have any influence at such a great distance. Note that Pluto is no longer the outermost planet in the solar system. It had to give up its place to a planetoid called Quaoar, discovered by the astronomers Michael Brown and Chadwick Trujillo. This planet is about 43 AU from the sun and would have a distance of about five kilometers in our model. But the fantasy goes even further and finds its further outgrowths in established units such as light year or parsec. Under the assumed conditions, a light year is

14

the distance that light travels in a year. Expressed in a “comprehensible” numerical value, it is therefore
9,460,800,000,000 kilometers. Furthermore, 3,262 light years are a parsec. There are actually distant galactic and intergalactic objects that are said to be thousands of light years away. Take the Orion Nebula, for example, which is recorded as being 1,630 light years away and, if transferred to our model, would appear to be about 12 million kilometers away. This is where human imagination ends and we reach distances that are simply incomprehensible to the human mind. For the sake of completeness, we would also like to include the Andromeda Nebula in our model, which is recorded in many sources as being 2.2 million light years away and would be a whopping 16 billion kilometers away in our model.

So you can see that Copernican space has a lot of space in which to accommodate many objects, no matter how far apart they are or how huge they are - there is always room.

As already mentioned, all distance measurements are based on a fundamental error, namely the assumption of a constant speed of light in space. So far, supporters of the Earth theory are still waiting for such an experiment that could yield new insights. But in vain - the experiment would be a small feat for today’s physics and it should not fail on the financial side. So what could be the reason if not the money?

Anyone who has the courage to use their own reason, as Kant said, should realize that it is impossible for light to reach the earth undamaged over such great distances - but so far no one has seemed to mind. The result is obvious: incorrect measurement results and also incorrect distances.

15

2.4 Unexplained phenomena and absurdities

The following processes will certainly seem unfamiliar to you. This is because modern physics textbooks simply ignore such inconsistencies in the otherwise “harmoniously constructed Copernican system”.

Take a magnet and hold a lighter underneath it. The result of this experiment is probably known from earlier physics times - the magnet loses its effect. In the earth, the magnetic poles exist in opposition to the geographical poles. According to geographers and physicists, these poles lie deep inside. The interior of the earth is said to be molten. From the previous experiment, however, it was clear that a magnet then loses its effect. So how do the magnetic poles come about?

But this is not the only phenomenon that occurs with the earth’s magnet. You will also be familiar with the inclination experiment from physics lessons. This involves a magnetic needle placed on a moving surface aligning itself according to the earth’s magnetic field. If you now move to the equator, it does not appear to align itself with either pole, but rather takes up a kind of middle position. Many physicists explain this by saying that the two poles attract the magnetic needle with equal force. That this cannot be the case becomes clear when you move in the direction of one of the magnetic poles - the inclination needle retains its position as before at the equator and changes only very slightly, so that it still does not point towards any magnetic pole.

Another phenomenon is the “Heaviside layer”, the layer that is essential for radio transmission, at least in the Copernican system. It is said to be located above the mesosphere at a height of 100 km. It was discovered by the

16

Physicist Oliver Heaviside in 1902. It was proven again by the Englishmen Appleton and Barnett, but it has not yet been really proven. It is only suspected and does not solve the problems of radio transmission in equatorial areas.

This is not intended to describe the phenomenon itself. Much more interesting is the fact of radio echoes from space. This is not at all justifiable from a Copernican perspective, because the “Heaviside layer” - also known as the ionosphere - is impermeable to radio waves. If a radio wave really could pass through the ionosphere by chance and for some inexplicable reason, this weak signal would have to be reflected in the Copernican, empty space and pass through the ionosphere a second time. Since these echoes were detected several times by Professor Störmer in 1927, one could almost call it a regularity. But what is the reason here?

Another phenomenon is the Fata Morgana, which is said to bridge long distances through countless reflections in the air layers of different temperatures. Even 100% perfect mirrors would not be able to transfer an image over hundreds of kilometers. Some observations even show that people in Strasbourg once enjoyed a truly detailed view of the port of Constantinople. But how can this be possible over such great distances, since the light intensity decreases with each reflection?

As you can see, there are a lot of inconsistencies in the Copernican system that are simply kept quiet, which was not only proven by our survey. In the course of the thesis, however, these phenomena will be clarified and clearly presented from the perspective of the Earth world theory.

17

2.4 Has Copernicus been proven?

Based on the previous description, the question should arise whether there is evidence to prove the convex shape of the earth. If you ask a Copernican why the earth is round, he will explain it by the existence of the horizon. If you ask him again why there is a horizon, he will try to explain it by the spherical shape of the earth. But that in itself is not a syllogism according to the Aristotelian definition. It is, however, proof that the spherical shape of the earth is simply not provable for the Copernicanists.

Now some will certainly try to overturn the argument we have provided by bringing in satellite images. However, we can counter that a camera is also subject to the assumed straightness of light and thus provides a false image of the earth in space. However, this phenomenon will explain itself later on.

Anyone who has followed the news about the Mars Express will certainly know that it simulates a “virtual tour” of Mars. However, it did not measure the size of Mars, so its assumed calculated diameter still exists. But it is precisely such a measurement process that could finally bring clarity to the world view question. But why isn’t it done?

Images of the sunrise on Mars also reveal a different size of the sun than is actually possible.

The biggest source of error is, as already mentioned, the assumption of a constant speed of light in space. However, a Russian physicist found that a laser beam thrown vertically upwards decreases in speed, ie behaves degressively. Why is it so difficult to find out about this and why are we not given concrete evidence that could prove that the Earth is spherical?

18

[ConcaveEarth.net]

3. The Earth-World Theory – An Introduction

3.1 Basic principles

If we believe the prophecies of the Copernican scientists, our universe will at some point die of cold death due to gravity and the resulting incredible and transfinite expansion, as at some point all the stars will have gone out and the universe will have cooled down to absolute zero.

So what created us will also cause us to perish at some point. But why should nature destroy man, who is considered the highest of all things? We ask again, why should anyone go to such trouble when everything ultimately leads to destruction?

The Earth world theory describes a world view in which we live not on the outside but on the inside - in a hollow sphere. This idea may seem a bit burlesque or even strange at first, because it contradicts the empirical facts that we live on a concave, curved earth. If you are by the sea, you can perceive the presumed convex curvature of the earth and have proof in your hand that appears to be verifiable.

But let’s move away from this idea and take a simple cell, created by nature and the basic building block of every living thing. A cross-section through a cell is also a cross-section through the cosmos. The cell membrane represents the earth’s shell and the cell nucleus the sphere of fixed stars. The sun and planets are represented by the nucleoli.

As you can see, a cell shows the same conditions as the earth in which we live – an analogy between cell and cosmos.

19

What works perfectly and flawlessly on a small scale will probably not cause any complications on a large scale either. So why should nature differentiate and develop a second system if the one works smoothly?

Everyone judges the universe as if they had been there themselves. However, most people’s knowledge is based only on astronomy books or specialist magazines. Even if it is pure number inflation, what trained astronomers claim should actually be correct is the motto today.

As already mentioned, what we are claiming is not a new idea, but rather comes from ancient religions and is still accepted as correct there today. This world view contradicted empiricism, and so an appropriate world view was developed. However, it must be emphasized that today’s world model arises from mathematics, and even Einstein once said: "Insofar as the statements of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain, and insofar as they are certain, they do not refer to reality. " This means nothing other than that nature is not calculable. Just because some things can be described with mathematical approximations does not mean that nature has been declared. A mathematical model is a model and not reality. But many researchers deal with this statement superficially and arrive at incorrect results, the deviations of which they cannot explain.

The inner world view is in and of itself a resonant and pure harmony of all processes. All of the research of the Copernican scientists comes together here and becomes one.

“All life originates in the interior of a hollow sphere. […] Life is inside. Nature remains the same in all parts.”

20

3.2 Introduction to the Hollow World

In the previous point, the inner world was considered quite philosophically in order to be able to draw an analogy to life. Now, however, it is made more concrete in order to be able to “penetrate” deeper into the idea of ​​​​a hollow sphere.

If the outdated geocentric worldview placed the earth at the center, then the sphere of fixed stars is at the center of the earth’s world. This sphere is the center from which we can perceive light phenomena such as stars or nebulae and has a roughly estimated diameter of 500 - 1000 kilometers.

The planets orbit around it in the following order from the center: Pluto, Neptune, Uranus, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Sun and Moon.

The sun and the moon are by no means lost in the list here. They are also planets like the others and do not require any special classification.

Mercury and Venus continue to orbit the planet Sun. If you believe the Copernican scientists, you would have to add another, eleventh planet before Pluto in the list according to the Earth’s view of the universe - Quaoar, which was only recently discovered.

If one now makes a cross-section through the inner world, it turns out that the celestial bodies move on spiral or spring-like orbits, which gives rise to the perceived image of the Copernican astronomers.

One of the most important prerequisites, however, is the curvature of light in space – but all Copernican measurement results are based on the straight-line assumption.

The fact that this is definitely not the case will be shown and verified in future experiments.

21

3.3 Reality or just an unreal thought?

For a philosophically minded person, the analogy between cell and cosmos would leave no room for doubt. He would be convinced of the correctness of the earthly world and would doubt the Copernican system more than ever.

However, we are no longer among the great thinkers of Plato or Aristotle, who was one of the favorite philosophers of the medieval church, even though he claimed that flies had eight legs and not six and that the brain was just a “cooling unit” for the head. He represented the geocentric world view, which was accepted as reality for several centuries and was not questioned until someone called Copernicus came along and thought he knew better. Since then, there has been a tremendous upswing in technology and science. The spirit of research drove humanity forward, but today it is slowing down due to problems that it cannot explain with the Copernican system.

We do not want to claim at this point that the inner world view is the only true and correct world view. But what convinces us is simply the fact that, in contrast to today’s world view, there is evidence that can prove the Earth world theory. The following evidence should at least give you food for thought and raise doubts about the heliocentric world view. All of today’s astronomy could also be given the prefix “Once upon a time, a long, long time ago…”, i.e. the introduction to every fairy tale. Why does no one object to the Copernican system if they only consider the vastness that we have determined in our size comparison? So, like energy, humans take the path of least resistance - but this is often the wrong one.

22

4. Evidence supporting the Hollow Earth

4.1 Proof of the curvature of light

Now that the previous points have introduced the topic, let us now move on to solid evidence and let the facts speak for themselves.

One of the most important facts about the Earth is the curvature of light. This makes us perceive the surface of the Earth as being convex and not concave.

It was the French professor Maurice Allais who managed to prove the curvature of light in the simplest way possible using a standard telescope. In short, Allais proved that light bends by around 1.5 millimeters at a distance of 8.3 meters every 24 to 25 hours. This deviation is very considerable given the short distance. He first aimed at a wall and fixed the telescope’s crosshairs on a marked point. He also carried out the experiment in the basement, which was shielded from any vibrations or temperature changes. This ruled out the argument of light refraction due to different air temperatures. It is also not possible to move the telescope because the room was protected against vibrations. If this is not enough for you, note that the experiment was carried out more than once.

However, it should be clearly emphasized that this proof must change the Copernican world view, because it assumes that light is straight. Furthermore, it must be admitted that this experiment only proved the curvature of light and not the inner world theory. However, since, as already mentioned, the inner world cosmos is based on curved light rays, this experiment is of great importance.

23

4.2 Proof of the stationary earth

“And yet it moves.”

This was once asserted by the Italian scholar Galileo Galilei, who accepted the teachings of Copernicus and thought further, but thereby came into conflict with the Church.

Today it is assumed that the Earth moves on its orbit around the sun at a speed of 30 kilometers per second. This alone gives rise to some absurdities. Every geography student knows that trade winds are caused by the deflecting force of the Earth’s rotation. But why then does the Earth’s atmosphere retain its closed shape when it travels “fast” around the sun? Shouldn’t the atmosphere be recognizable as the Earth’s tail at such a speed?

If this is not enough for you, please follow the experiment described below. The speed of a ship is measured by throwing a log overboard and measuring the length of the line that floats past the log vertically in the water in a certain time. A similar thing can be done with the earth. If the earth were to move around the sun, a beam of light “thrown overboard” would be blown off course due to this immense speed and would therefore land next to the sensor located deeper down. However, exact measurements showed that the deviation of the light is zero and that the earth is therefore standing still.

The same applies to the rotation of the earth. Barnett realized that an iron rod that is set in rotation becomes magnetic. If the earth, which is permeated with iron, rotates, a magnetic field would be created that would stop the earth’s rotation in a short time.

Therefore, the Earth’s revolution and rotation are not Copernican-based and are in need of improvement.

24

4.3 UG Morrow – The Rectilineator

The rectilineator provides clear and unequivocal proof of the concave curvature of the earth. The experiment is so ingenious that it could be reconstructed, but the cost would not be low.

This is a mechanical proof that is free of any optical laws and thus provides the final proof for the earth’s world. If we really lived on a convex earth, then drawing a tangent would cause it to move away from the earth’s surface. But the straight line drawing proves exactly the opposite - instead of a tangent, we get a chord that approaches the earth’s surface and does not move away from it.

It was the Americans Dr. Teed and UG Morrow who set out to finally bring clarity to the world view question. Morrow’s idea was very simple. He wanted to create a straight line by joining small units together.

Quality was the top priority. When manufacturing the individual units, it was very important to ensure that the angles were as accurate as possible, or at least that there were no deviations at all. The first unit was aligned horizontally with the utmost precision, and the other units were then attached to it with the same level of precision.

For final adjustment and safety, a celluloid foil with a thickness of 0.2 millimeters was used, which had to pass through the gap between two units without friction - only then was a square correctly adjusted.

It should be emphasized again that only the first square was aligned horizontally. Otherwise, the line created would follow the curvature of the earth and not be straight.

25

Morrow was well aware of the demands of his device and believed that “if it was inaccurate, it had to be made accurate,” because he had a duty to the world to be precise. Accordingly, several months were spent setting up a 3.8-kilometer test track.

Ultimately, all that remained for the measurements was to establish a reference level, since the land surface was not suitable for this due to its unevenness - so reference was made to the sea.

Ultimately, the measurements showed that the earth curves upwards and not downwards as previously assumed. This experiment is therefore a clear proof of the hollow earth theory. People have tried to object that it is impossible to construct such a straight line, but one can counter that even the production technology of the time achieved accuracies of one thousandth. Therefore, in the end, there is no way that there could be a deviation of five meters from the water surface over 3.8 kilometers.

To date, however, the experiment has not been repeated - it should be noted that at $32,000 it was not exactly cheap. However, we think that it would be easy for a consortium to finance such a project again. After all, this is how they manage to lay thousands of underwater cables that connect the world. So why is the experiment not repeated? Are they afraid of the outcome and thus saving money?

As one must now acknowledge without a doubt, Morrow’s unique experiment provided a final decision in the debate about the correct world view. From this point on, everyone should at least have started to ponder the correctness of the Copernican system and at least acknowledge the earthly world.

However, it remains to be mentioned that the Copernicanists have not yet made any attempt to prove and substantiate the convex shape of the Earth.

26

4.4 The Sailing Ship Experiment

We would like to mention right at the beginning that this is an optical experiment that was once carried out by Captain Bredow to prove the concave curvature of the Earth’s surface. Optical experiments are not fundamental proofs for one theory or another, since we are not able to describe all “optical illusions”, let alone know them.

Nevertheless, we are citing the experiment here because the physicists of the Copernican system cannot explain this phenomenon at all.

Captain Bredow once stretched a cloth between the masts of his ship parallel to the deck, which was red at the bottom and white at the top. To enhance the effect of the red surface, mirrors were mounted in the lower masts to reflect sunlight onto the desired surface. The ship then sailed out to sea and, as one would assume empirically, disappeared “behind” the horizon until the entire hull had disappeared and only the tops of the masts and their accessories were visible. If the ship now moved further away, the red surface would appear completely and “cover” the white one due to the convex curvature of the earth. However, this syllogism did not occur, but rather the exact opposite - the red surface disappeared.

A murmur and amazement went through the crowd of observers at the harbor – how could this be possible?

This experiment was also described in our survey. Only six of 21 respondents correctly judged the true outcome of the experiment, that the red area would disappear. The survey then asked whether they could imagine living on a concave surface of the earth. To our surprise, zero percent could imagine this, so how do we explain the 28 percent

27

the correctly answered outcome of the sailing ship experiment? We do not fully understand this line of thought and can therefore claim that the respondents did not think about this experiment sufficiently and simply ticked something.

However, as mentioned at the beginning, this is an optical experiment. The hollow earth theory does not really accept this experiment as proof of the concave curvature of the earth, even if it would confirm the actual curvature of the earth. This is because we are not at all aware of all “optical illusions”. Accordingly, it would be completely pointless to prove the curvature of the earth with the help of a laser, since a laser is subject to the curvature of light just like “ordinary” light.

As an added absurdity, the ship would have to disappear much sooner than the visual evidence would suggest. This would be another contradiction for which the Copernicanists have no counterarguments.

You can read about all sorts of achievements of the Copernican scientists in every school physics textbook, but where do you learn about experiments that reveal a contradiction in the otherwise harmoniously functioning system? Actually, you should be grateful to these people, like Captain Bredow, for uncovering such inconsistencies.

You can’t even find out about such an experiment on the Internet. You have to rely on books that are no longer available in mail order to even find out about other opinions that are contrary to the opinion of the general public.

“When people talk about God, they seem to me like Lichtenberg’s Kahlenberg farmers who, when a knife is missing, put a piece of wood in the sheath so that it is not empty.”

28

4.5 The diverging solders in multiple execution

In our survey we described the test of the plumb lines sunk into the depths. Two plumb lines were sunk 1.3 kilometers into the Tamarack mine in Calumet, USA. Measurements showed that the plumb lines were moving away from each other and not getting closer together, as should be the case on a solid spherical Earth and was actually intended.
At first these measurements were not an experiment, but they only served a practical purpose. The engineers at the time were surprised by the unusual behavior and repeated the process in collaboration with Professor Mc. Nair. As a follower of the Copernican movement, he had to grudgingly admit that the plumb lines were moving away from each other instead of getting closer together.

The description of this experiment also appeared in our survey. There were many who were not aware of this experiment, but also some who tried to refute it with counterarguments.

Someone claimed: “Even small errors determine the angle […]. Another problem might be other different rock layers that could cause errors in accuracy when drilling.” It is clear that some thought has already been given to this, but we would now like to refute these objections.

An error in the angles such as that described in the quote would only occur if the angle was large. Even the technology at the time was so good that such an error could be avoided. If that were the case, the plumb lines would possibly have the same distance as on the earth’s surface. The argument about the different rock layers can also be refuted, as the experiment was carried out not once, but several times in different materials with the same result.

29

It is also possible to carry out this plumb test in the laboratory using just two pendulums. Today’s technology is so advanced that light waves with a length of one billionth of a meter can now be measured.

In this experiment, as mentioned, two plumb lines, each two meters long, are set up at a distance of twenty meters. If we live on a solid spherical earth, the distance between the pendulum suspension points would have to be greater than the distance between the pendulum end points. This experiment is theoretically feasible, but has not yet been carried out - although perhaps there will soon be interest in this experiment.

Rolf Keppler, together with Wilhelm Martin, carried out another optical plumb line test on the Kochertal Bridge. The aim was to compare the bridge section with the valley section. It turned out that the bridge section deviated by around two millimeters from the larger valley section - so this measurement clearly indicates an internal world view. This test was initiated by Professor Böttinger, but Rolf Keppler assumes that it is based on the wrong basis. In this test, the assumed refraction is used, which attempts to compensate for measurement errors. In the internal world view, no error correction is required, as the “refraction” has already been included there.

But this plumbing attempt will not be the last. Rolf Keppler is currently working on another attempt in which he wants to take measurements between Asemwald and the observation tower in order to get to the bottom of the cause and finally gain clarity on the concave or convex curvature of the earth’s surface.

30

4.6 Infrared images

Infrared photography has produced images that can only be explained by the Earth’s concave curvature. To get an overview, please take a look at the following two photographs.

The first image is a picture taken from an airplane that was at an altitude of about seven kilometers. By assuming the convex surface of the earth, it is possible to calculate the visibility that the airplane should have had - it is calculated to be about 296 kilometers. However, the infrared photograph clearly shows that the photo extends the airplane’s view. He was able to see a full 500 kilometers further instead of just 296 kilometers and recognized the base of Mount Chasta.

Possible objections to this image include the refraction of light. However, this can be refuted because the entire landscape can be seen right up to the foot of the mountain. Furthermore, it is absurd that a landscape over 500 kilometers long could be created by a mirage.

There are also photographs from the US Army that provide evidence of the inner world view. The second image shows a photograph taken with a new telephoto lens in 1954. The only disadvantage of the lens was that it supposedly completely eliminated perspective. The image was taken from a height of about one meter and the camera was on the beach at Atlantic Highlands. It captured an island six kilometers away from the top, the inlet behind it and the harbor of Coney Island.

So what can we learn from this?

The horizon has nothing to do with the spherical shape of the earth’s surface, since it can be optically resolved, as the above-mentioned and other infrared photographs attest.

[ConcaveEarth.net]

## 5. Structure and Functionality

5.1 The general mechanical force theory

In order to understand the structure and functions of the hollow earth, one must start with the cause that runs through the entire theory. For this cause, Johannes Lang developed his general mechanical theory of forces, which will now be described and explained.

According to Helmholtz, energy or force can neither be created nor destroyed. Force and energy can only be transferred into other forms of force. For example, potential energy can be converted into kinetic or thermal energy. Converting thermal energy into potential or kinetic energy is much more difficult than you might think, but there are devices such as heat converters that can do this.

Johannes Lang himself writes: “If one can transform all forms of force into one another, resulting in an equivalence, then force as such must necessarily be a unity, independent of its respective form.”

This means nothing other than that every force is the same in its basic character, ie has the same cause. In the Copernican system, a contradiction is immediately revealed, namely the “attraction of mass” or gravity. This force must constantly do work without being influenced in any way - this contradicts the statement made by Helmholtz. Newton, the founder of the law of gravity, was already aware of the problem and could not explain it either. He assumed that the cause was God’s breath, which set the planets in “motion”.

32

This problem is not pointed out to you in school. They only say that gravity is a property of mass. No one has ever found out where this force actually comes from. It is simply there, unchanging, continuous, constant - and that is precisely where the contradiction lies. Johannes Lang proceeds as follows in his theory of force. If you divide matter, you will eventually reach a state where it can no longer be divided, because we cannot grasp infinity, just as we cannot grasp the concept of “nothing” - no one can imagine what that means. This “judgment particle” has the shape of a sphere, because, as we know, that is the most ideal state. Now comes the analogy - if this explanation applies to matter, then the same applies to force, so there is a primal movement. You could imagine this movement equivalently as spheres that orbit around an axis and can no longer be influenced - except in their position in space. The carriers of the primal movement are the electrons, which are already largely familiar to us. They are responsible for electricity and represent the basis of force - therefore an electron is the “primal force”. Now there are a lot of electrons and therefore also rotation. It is therefore inevitable that they would never touch each other. As soon as they do, repulsion occurs when they are opposite contracting poles. According to Ampèr’s floater’s rule, the pole to the right of the direction of rotation is called the negative pole, or south pole, and the one to the left is called the north pole, or positive pole. Due to the repulsion, all electrons strive for space, which is limited by the wall of the hollow world. If the rotation were to be stopped by the repulsion, all movement would already have come to a standstill - but this is impossible because this rotation is the “primal force”.

33

and that this is unchangeable.

The greatest impact force of a ball occurs at its equator, which everyone has probably noticed when playing billiards. Accordingly, the electrons with the greatest impact force, which were characterized by rotation in the same direction, increasingly found themselves together and separated the opposing electrons to the outside.

However, these also acted on the separated electrons and forced their “will” on them - now all electrons rotated in the same way. This means that the north and south poles are now all aligned in the same way. Johannes Lang was thus able to establish “absolute directions” that were generally valid. If one now represents oneself as the axis of rotation of these electrons, east is to the left and west to the right. North is in the direction of the head and south is in the direction of the feet. The hollow earth theory thus makes it possible to create an absolute reference system for the first time, which even the Copernican scientists did not yet have. Johannes Lang even succeeded in proving this electron rotation independently of the earth world theory. It was the electron spin that even confirmed that electrons rotate around an axis and in doing so generate a magnetic moment of the smallest possible magnetic unit. The dictionary states: “A magnetic moment is associated with the electron spin.” This means that the magnetic moment is only generated by the rotation, which Johannes Lang sees differently, because he sees the magnetic moment already in the spin. So let’s say that the electron spin exists and the electron aligns itself north-south like a magnet. Since the electrons are polarized, the mutual impacts of the remaining electrons set the whole group in motion - a current is created that constantly “flows” from east to west and is referred to by Johannes Lang as the “east-west force.” Johannes Lang simply put the results of the Copernican scientists together correctly and thus founded his “general mechanical theory of force.”

34

5.2 The World Ether – The Electron Sea

Why is the existence of an ether necessary at all?

If sound is to be transmitted, it needs a material in which it can spread. The same applies to light or magnetism. No human mind could understand how magnetism spreads through nothingness or emptiness. There must be a mediator. On the other hand, they would be long-distance forces, but these are denied by the Copernicanists just like the ether.

For centuries, the revolutionary sciences have discussed the existence of such an ether. With the help of Michelson, the question of the existence of such a substance finally seemed to be clarified - there is no ether, because an ether wind would be measurable during the Earth’s flight through space. But this did not exist.

However, the earth does not move either, but stands still in the inner world view, which means that no ether wind could be detected in this way, since the experiment mentioned was based on the principle of earth movement.

Over time, different ideas accumulated and a conception of the ether emerged that is unimaginable: “infinitely hard, infinitely elastic, infinitely thin, infinitely dense and, on top of that, a solid body […]. On the one hand, it is supposed to be at rest […], on the other hand, it is supposed to […] move.” Where is the logic in what is otherwise such an “exact science?”

As already mentioned, Michelson and the theory of relativity seemed to deny the existence of such an ether. This naturally raises the question of how one can explain radiant forces such as light. It is a wave that requires a medium. But what is supposed to vibrate when space is empty and, to top it all off, thousands of light years away?

Brockhaus even went so far as to attribute properties to empty space itself in order to assume certain states – where

35

Is there any natural common sense left? According to this, Brockhaus could also describe a triangle as a circle and vice versa.

Be that as it may, if the sun were a ball of glowing gas, then it would also radiate heat in a space cold at -273 °Celsius across the void to the earth. The last sentence alone is worth reading carefully. If you now set up two surfaces, one at a right angle and one not at a right angle, adapted to the sun’s rays, the one at a right angle will heat up more than the second. How is that possible when they are the same heat rays - possibly a loss? But that is not possible according to the law of conservation of energy - so where is the energy?

Johannes Lang says: “The result of these considerations can only be the realization that the sun’s rays are not heat rays at all […], but the sun is also not a ball of glowing gas.”

The hollow earth theory solves the mystery - sun rays are neither light nor heat rays, they are simply electron currents that only generate light and heat when they come into contact with matter. Air lets the radiant heat pass through almost unhindered, but we also know the principle of heat transmission from physics lessons. The earth’s surface, which vibrates and is therefore permeated with heat, transfers its heat to the air, which explains why the air is warmest near the ground.

In order to avoid any confusion with ether concepts from the old physics junk box, Johannes Lang also refers to the ether as a sea of ​​electrons.

The last thing to be added is that the electron beam is bent due to the “east-west force” and this also leads to the curvature of light. These spread out in the form of the field lines of a magnet, which can be easily represented using metal shavings and a magnet. The sun therefore does not give off heat or light, but is only an illuminated planet and not a star.

36

5.3 Magnetism and Electricity

Have you ever asked yourself what a magnetic field actually is? How does attraction work in the Copernican universe?

The answer to this question is quite simple, in the Copernican system a long-distance force would have to exist, because space is empty - but this mysterious long-distance force is strictly rejected by the Copernican, because such a thing is incomprehensible to the at least

Ask yourself another question: does attraction and therefore gravity really exist?

Johannes Lang has a very simple answer to this question: “No.” Any “suction effect” is a “pressure effect” - this can be illustrated by a centrifugal pump, which only simulates a suction effect. If you set such a flywheel in motion, it throws air away radially. The consequence is that, as in Torricelli’s case, a “horror vacui” is created, which nature is so afraid of. The air pressure now causes air to be fed in axially again to compensate for the vacuum. The impression of suction is created, which is actually caused by the air pressure - in other words, a pressure effect.

Now comes the analogy to the hollow earth, which Johannes Lang describes as follows. The air is now replaced by the free electrons and the disk by a bar magnet - the processes are now the same. The basis for his derivation is the general mechanical force theory described above.

As soon as a magnetic substance is placed in a room, it creates resistance for the free electrons. These then swirl around the “magnetic” molecule and “defeat” it. As long as these molecules are confused, there is no “magnetic field”. If this substance is now magnetized by placing a coil around it and aligning the molecules using the electric current, a “magnetic field” is created. The free electrons then emerge at the north pole, meet the respective electrons in the room and collide with them. These create such a resistance that the electrons and their respective successors are pushed off their trajectories and a kind of fountain is formed, which penetrates the magnet again at the south pole as they try to balance out the “vacuum of electrons” there. This creates the typical image of a bar magnet - the magnetic field, which can be represented with small iron filings and a magnet.

But how can opposite poles attract and like poles repel? If you bring opposite poles together, the impacts are in the same direction, so there is no resistance, and the electrons therefore push in space and push the two magnets towards each other. The suction effect is therefore a pressure effect and not a long-distance force at all.

Syllogistically, the same applies to repulsion when the magnetic poles are the same. The emerging electrons collide with each other and repel each other as a result. The only question that remains is why a heated magnet loses its magnetism. But everyone can definitely answer this for themselves, because when heated, the natural vibration of the molecules increases and thus increases the distance from others, whereby the elementary magnets lose their effect.

Modern physics says that magnetism and electricity are the same fields, but when explaining electricity it assumes two types of charge carriers - namely positive and negative electricity. However, we now know that there is only electricity, but that a body can take on a positive or negative electrical character. When it comes to magnetism, no one talks about positive and negative magnetism - it is one and the same “current” that exits at the north pole and enters at the south pole.

38

Electricity itself is just the vibration of matter and is neither positive nor negative. But how can there be the character of positive and negative electricity?

If the elementary currents from the outside circle around the molecules in a counterclockwise direction, the body is “electrically positive” - ​​​​the same applies, of course, to the “electrically negative” character. The body in question therefore has an electric field, which is also transmitted to other bodies by the electrons in the Earth’s space. The most important phenomenon that distinguishes the electric body from the magnetic one is “electrical attraction”. The metal body is first attracted and then repelled again - how does this happen?

When an electric body exerts its field on a non-electrified body, an induction occurs, whereby the “molecular magnets”, as Johannes Lang calls them, align themselves in the opposite direction to the attractive pole. This is then attracted; the process is then the same as when two bar magnets with different poles are placed opposite each other. After the attraction has taken place, the electrified body “experiences” the “direction” of the attractive body. Its “molecular magnets” then align themselves in the same way as they did in the original body.

In summary, it can be said that electricity and magnetism are essentially the same. This idea often led to inconsistencies among the Copernicanists. Many of them were on the right track, but then encountered contradictions in the Copernican system, which made them reject the newly discovered theory. Johannes Lang thus succeeded in explaining magnetism and electricity in a unified manner with the help of his general mechanical theory of force.

39

5.4 Formation of the horizon

Now let’s come to the thing that probably concerns everyone and would serve as the first counter-argument to the inner world theory. If you confront someone with the inner world theory, they will try to refute it by looking at the convexly curved horizon. Do these people assume that the inner world theorists have never left the house and seen the horizon with their own eyes? It would be absurd to assume that the inner world would not concern itself with such a primary phenomenon. Accordingly, we will now describe how a horizon can arise in the hollow world.

First, however, an optical basis. The eye can no longer perceive light rays that have an angle smaller than 0.0167° and therefore represents them as a point. This way of perceiving is important for the formation of a horizon. Accordingly, one can also see a ship on a flat surface sinking below the horizon. The angle becomes smaller and smaller with increasing distance. When the ship now moves to such a great distance, the eye sees it as a point and it appears to sink behind the horizon - the hull first and then the masts. But shouldn’t the ship shrink in size in the same way? No, because the hull is much closer to the observer’s eye level and then first converges with the light rays of the water horizon and is represented as a point. The masts are still visible at that time because there is no “horizon” in the air and therefore there are no light rays that converge with the light rays of the mast. Accordingly, a ship sinks bit by bit behind the horizon even on a flat surface.

40

Since it has now been shown that a horizon can form on a flat surface, the formation of the horizon in the concave surface will now be explained.

To show the conditions of the horizon in the concave Earth, look at drawing number one.

A few glances at it should actually explain the entire horizon formation as best as possible, but some explanations will follow.

The eye only receives the “ends” of the light and looks for its position in the straight extension, since it cannot follow curved light - the concave surface thus becomes a convex surface. Ships that now sail down the sea therefore appear with the mast first and then with their remaining parts - as usual. So it is not as difficult to explain as you might have thought.

The horizon was never investigated by the supporters of the Copernican world view, since it seemed to be empirically proven and any counter-assumption would be “ridiculous” - this would have to doubt the image seen - who would do something like that?

The Copernicanists tried to prove the existence of the horizon by the spherical shape of the earth and tried to prove the spherical shape of the earth using the horizon in an inverted way. In our opinion, the proof has not been fully understood here. You cannot simply prove one fact with another and then use the last one to establish the original one again.

Johannes Lang believes that research always requires doubt. He is absolutely right in this assertion, although the best example would of course be the horizon, which every Copernican thinks is so credible that it does not need to be investigated. But if today’s science does not take the time to investigate the “self-evident” things, it will never find its errors and will eventually see a regression instead of progress.

41

5.5 Sun, Moon and other planets

The headline is incorrectly worded by no means, because in the hollow earth the sun and the moon are also planets like Mercury or Venus. In cases like the sun, this might sound a bit strange and absurd at first, because everyone knows that the sun is a glowing hot ball of gas that provides huge amounts of energy through a nuclear fusion process and thus shines itself. This qualification would mark it as a star and not a planet - or would it?

But first let us explain the role of the sun in the Copernican system. According to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, the sun’s radiation intensity is 3.8 * 10 20 megawatts. If you relate this energy to the earth, you get 1.7 * 10 14 kilowatts, which would correspond to about 1 / 2300000000 of the total radiation. The sun radiates the rest somewhere else, where it then dies unused. The sun will also die at some point and in a great “fireworks display” will swallow up the “inner” planets along with the earth and go out - then life will be over. Should nature really and seriously want such a massacre?

In the Earth world theory, something like that is not possible, because the sun is a normal planet. The planet sun is located exactly in the radiation stream of the celestial sphere and the earth, and therefore gives rise to the assumption that it would emit all light and heat rays. Curiously, this ball of hot glowing gas, which is made up of millions of atoms, is said to have a magnetic force field that is enormously large. Magnets that are even “slightly” heated lose their magnetic field, so why should the sun be an exception?

42

It has also been discovered that sunspots only form on the back, on the east side and very occasionally on the front side of the sun. However, if the earth rotates around the sun, it should pass these spot areas at some point - but this is not the case. In the hollow earth theory, these sunspots are nothing more than matter that is pressed against the back of the sun by the electron flow. The spots on the front side are formed by matter that gets caught in the sun’s gravitational field and manages to overcome the electron pressure. As a result, there are very few sunspots on the front side.

The sun, the moon, Venus and other planets are nothing more than hollow spheres like the earth. Their life also takes place inside and may be much more advanced than ours in the earth. Their diameters are guaranteed to be many times smaller than those assumed today, as the curved light does not allow for precise measurements in this way; the planet would have to be measured on site.

Another phenomenon that the Copernican scientists have not explained is the fact that the planets also receive light on their backs. For example, they tried to explain the illuminated rings on Saturn’s night side with its own illumination. However, this would be so weak that the rings would not be visible. In the terrestrial world, the Earth itself acts like a concave mirror that reflects the light and thus illuminates the planets.

It is interesting that Johannes Lang speaks in his book of two “transplutonic” planets, of which one, namely “Quaoar”, has already been discovered according to current knowledge. He deliberately does not reveal the data, as the astronomers of the time would certainly have celebrated them as their new discoveries. It is clear that the hollow earth theory can provide explanations in many areas that today’s scientists cannot even provide.

43

5.6 Origin of day and night

If we live in a hollow sphere, then syllogistically it should be light all day and all night. This idea is a typical fantasy that goes around in the head of everyone who reads about the hollow earth for the first time. The process of how day and night come into being is, however, very easy to understand.

We already know that in the middle of the earth there is the celestial sphere, from which the electron current that brings light and heat emanates. The process becomes clear and understandable to us analogously if we look at drawing number two

The lines of the electron current show the course of the field lines of a magnet.

Now the celestial sphere is not standing still, but is rotating, which means that the electron stream also reaches the other side of the Earth. But how do the different lengths of day and night come about?

The sun never has the same height, but varies from place to place. If you observe the sun over the course of a year, you will see that it follows a spiral-like orbit, the extremes of which are the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn.

The fact that there are still difficulties with day and night in the Copernican system is shown in the program “History of Space Travel,” which aired on RTL on January 3, 2004. It shows a picture in which the earth and the sun can be seen in the left half. Syllogistically, the left half of the earth should also be illuminated. To everyone’s astonishment, however, the right half is illuminated. How can something like that be possible?

So you can see that omnipresent processes such as day and night still cause a sensation even in the Copernican system. Before you start exploring space and risk getting lost in its infinite vastness, you should first take a look at the phenomena that are immediately apparent.

44

5.7 Origin of the seasons

The answer to the question of when the Earth is closest to the Sun seems completely illogical - it is in winter. It is claimed that the Earth’s ecliptic, ie the oblique incidence of light rays, is supposed to cause this variation. However, this would mean that a surface aligned perpendicular to the sun’s rays would be heated in winter just as much as the same surface in summer. However, this is not the case. Therefore, the seasons cannot be caused by the Earth’s ecliptic, as the Copernicanists make us believe from their great magic box.

The possibility that the light beam is “cooled” by the air is also ruled out. Every geography student knows that it is not the air that is heated, but the earth. This in turn heats the air. Otherwise there would be no more ski tourism in the mountains, which would be very damaging for the companies based there.

So if the seasons cannot be explained in these ways and the Copernican system is once again undermined, how do they really arise?

As we know from the previous point, the sun moves between two tropics. The light rays decrease with the square of the distance. The same applies to the heat rays. In summer, the earth orbits more in the northern hemisphere and the path of the heat rays is much shorter than in winter, because the sun stays more in the southern hemisphere.

Once again, a major event can be explained in just a few lines. One simply has to admit that the Earth theory is an easily understandable theory, whereas the Copernicians keep getting caught up in new contradictions from which they ultimately cannot escape. This was not the first time that Copernicanism was shaken. Even in the infinite vastness there is always a dead end.

45

5.8 Moon phases, lunar and solar eclipses

Moon phases do not occur in the hollow earth in any other way than previously thought. The moon is only illuminated in certain places, which means that the remaining areas naturally appear dark.

A new moon occurs when the moon is only illuminated from behind. This is the case when it is in line with the electron stream emerging vertically from the celestial sphere. The remaining stages are created in the same way by the different angles of the electron stream to the moon. When the moon is full, the entire side of the moon facing us is fogged up by the returning electron stream. Then the moon “decreases” again from full moon to new moon and the cycle is complete. Drawing number three is intended to help you internalize the process.

If you look closely at the picture, you can also see a space empty of light, the back side of the Earth. When the moon is directly opposite the sun and the two are separated by the celestial sphere, the moon moves in this space empty of light. Consequently, there is a lunar eclipse. It is impossible to explain in Copernican terms how it is possible for the moon to be further illuminated on the back side during a lunar eclipse. So we ask, where does the light come from if the Earth should actually be between the moon and the sun?

In the hollow earth, the night channel is circular. When the moon moves through this channel with certain parts, a circular shadow appears on it, the edges of which are illuminated. The Copernican scientists try to present and sell this circular shadow as the Earth’s shadow.

With regard to the solar eclipse, the hollow earth and Copernicanism are congruent and of the same opinion. Once again, the hollow earth is able to explain processes that are very difficult for a Copernican-influenced person to imagine.

46

5.9 Circulation of celestial bodies

Celestial bodies are galactic and intergalactic objects that are said to move far away in the infinite expanses of space. They are so far away from the Earth that the only light that can be perceived is the light that comes from them or is reflected. In addition, the light is said to always travel in a straight line over these enormous distances of several light years and cannot be diverted from its course. Such precision is beyond the human mind’s comprehension.

The only thing that one perceives are light phenomena and not objects. The idea that these are really only light phenomena does not occur to one. The objects that are now referred to as galaxies or stars are only light phenomena on the celestial sphere and nothing else. These are also referred to today as fixed stars because they appear to be stationary. But instead of holding on to these completely correct thoughts, one says to oneself that these objects must be so far away from the earth that their rotation would no longer be perceptible.

Drawing number four now shows how a fixed star culminates.

The “fixed stars” are fixed and are located on the celestial sphere. This is the only one that rotates. The light is curved as usual and reaches the observer in this way. The eye looks for the straight extension at the relevant angle of incidence. If the point of light is located quite far out, its extension is behind the horizon. The “fixed star” is rising or has just set. When the celestial sphere moves, an almost infinitely shining canopy of heaven opens up above the observer, which allows many false conclusions to be drawn.

47

5.10 How does the universe fit into the hollow world

The huge number inflations of astronomers actually prevent one from imagining anything else. One imagines that the universe must be enormous. Has anyone ever been to a planet and carried out a local surface survey? Certainly not.

According to ESA, not even the Mars Express, which recently simulated a virtual tour of the surface of Mars, has taken any surface measurements. Such statements are not verifiable. How can you analyze the surface without measuring it? We are certainly right in assuming that they want to withhold the data from us, since the values ​​that came out are probably completely different to those calculated and are probably based on a defect in the on-board instruments - the standard excuse.

The true diameters of the planets cannot be calculated with today’s tools, because the curvature of light is currently unpredictable. For a sphere with a diameter of around 12,740 kilometers, the volume is around 1.8 trillion cubic kilometers. Even such a number is beyond comprehension. However, it can be large enough to encompass a universe. One should not be fooled by the gigantic numbers of the Copernican scientists, which are almost so large that they are lost in the infinite expanse.

Finally, some estimates from Mr. Diehl, who estimates the diameter of the sun to be 250 kilometers, the moon to be 150 kilometers, and Mars to be 100 kilometers. The sphere of fixed stars has an extension of around 1000 kilometers. Mind you, these are only estimates that have not yet been confirmed.

48

5.11 What is outside?

This question is likely to torment anyone who has read a little about the hollow earth theory. However, it is important to first explain exactly what is going on inside the globe. But there are also various possibilities as to what it could be like outside. However, these assumptions are only general and things could be completely different.

The Earth could also be a planet in another cycle, like Mars, for example. But what would be behind the next shell? Perhaps another one - and behind that one? -another one. It would be an endless process. Likewise, there could be absolutely nothing outside the Earth’s shell.

However, these two assumptions are not satisfactory for the brain and are also inconceivable. What is nothing? The brain is made of matter, thinks materially and can therefore only grasp material things. It is just as impossible to grasp infinity.

Accordingly, these two suggestions are not entirely satisfactory. You are moving to the limits of philosophy if you really want to answer this question. We cannot understand what is outside because we live on the inside. The outer shell of the earth is hidden from us. We can only think about it, but none of our imaginations will ever be able to cover what it is really like out there.

In the same way, today’s astronomers are unable to answer the question of the Big Bang and are now placing the creation story there. No one can answer what is outside the Copernican system either.

We ourselves are part of the world of appearances in which we live. We can only perceive what our senses and measuring instruments convey to us. The outside world does not belong to this, because it is not part of the human world of appearances.

49

6. Unexplained phenomena of the Copernican physicists clarified

6.1 The Fata Morgana

Even today, with the knowledge of modern science, it has not yet been possible to explain the Fata Morgana, so-called mirages. According to Professor Everdingen, we are only able to explain “simple forms of the observed reflections”. There is no mention of complex reflections here, since they apparently cannot be explained with Everdingen’s theory.

Attempts are being made to explain mirages with the help of air layers with different temperatures. Distant landscapes, which are often visible, are supposed to be transmitted via such a reflection path. Note that this would only be possible with numerous reflections and under the fact that each reflection “swallows” light - not even flat mirrors would be able to transport search an image over hundreds of kilometers. For some of the mirages observed, it would be necessary to reflect around the convex earth. In the hollow earth, however, the mirage is quite easy to explain. It is based on exactly the same knowledge as in the Copernican system, but here only one reflection is required and not twenty. Its path is the “chord of the bow” of the concave earth. In the hollow earth, the “reflecting” light has a free path until it reaches the earth’s surface again.

Mirages are often used in Copernicanism when it comes to refuting infrared images. But not all absurdities in infrared photos can be mirages. Science tries to silence every objection. Even today it has not realized that this is what is preventing it from making progress and is therefore rigid in its achievements.

50

6.2 The radio phenomena

The problem was already described and explained at the beginning. A radio signal is sent out into space at a certain angle and is received a short time later as an echo at another location on Earth at exactly the same angle from space, which is why they are also called space echoes. The Copernican approach is used to try to solve the problem as follows. The radio waves emitted are slowed down to a real “walking pace” in this ionosphere and then return to Earth. This is an explanation without any proof. It is just a desperate attempt to save the Copernican system again and not let it perish.

Radio echoes are not uncommon or absurd in the Earth’s world. See drawing number five.

The phenomenon should then be cleared up by itself. The radio waves penetrate the earth’s space, are bent and then hit the earth again a short time later. Using directional antennas, it has been determined that the angle of reception and transmission are almost the same, which means that on the concave earth there is a straight line between the transmitter and receiver. In the Copernican system it would be radiated into infinity and then come back from infinity. At this point, common sense should raise objections.

Instead, the absurdities continue to be taught, even though the contradictions are known. We have the right to truth and clarity. Even today, in school, we don’t learn about problems like radio echoes that science cannot explain. It is simply absurd that no research is being done here and we are simply left in the dark.

“The truth is that we don’t know what the truth is.”

51

6.3 Earth’s magnetism

If you take an inclination needle, it will “adjust” to the Earth’s magnetic field after a short time. What is the reason for this, if we have already shown earlier that the magnetic field assumed today cannot exist due to the Earth’s hot core?

The starting point is the electrons that are in space and the fact discovered by Ampère that the elementary currents are electrons that rotate around an iron molecule. In the case of a rectified iron, all electrons rotate in the same direction. These then collide with the electrons in the Earth’s space. Simply put, the elementary currents are now directed by the “Earth electrons” until the axis is parallel to the Earth’s axis.

If you look at drawing number six, you will see that the inclination needles are parallel to the Earth’s axis at every location on Earth, just as Faraday would have found if it had not been for the apparent anomaly of the inclination needles at the equator.

Every form of energy and force can be traced back to the primal movement of electrons. This is what keeps everything moving. If it didn’t exist, everything would have come to a standstill.

It can therefore be said that the general mechanical theory of forces created by Johannes Lang is capable of explaining the processes in the earth. The best thing about it is that it is based on the research results of the Copernican scientists. Johannes Lang did nothing more than put everything together to form a “harmonious whole”. In his opinion, physicists would have come to this conclusion even if they had not trapped themselves under the obsession of a convex earth.

52

6.4 Tides

It is no longer a secret that the tides are a phenomenon that is very difficult to explain. There are therefore various models to explain this phenomenon. One of them, which supports the popular opinion, will now be explained in more detail. The moon is said to be to blame for all of them. It is responsible for the masses of water being attracted to the side facing it. If that were all, the phenomenon would be simple and easy to understand. No, nature doesn’t make it that simple for us. A tidal bulge also forms on the opposite side. But how can this be explained? This is where the centrifugal force is used, which is created by the shared rotation of the Earth-Moon system. The common center of gravity of the system is somewhere in the Earth’s interior, as the Earth is 80 times the size of the Moon.

However, this explanation cannot explain why the moon’s weak gravitational pull is able to lift the water and overcome the earth’s gravitational pull on the water - assuming that gravitational pull even exists.

In the hollow earth theory, gravity is a real force and not a property of mass. All celestial bodies, such as the moon or the sun, have a force field in the form of magnetic lines. The moon influences us the most because it is also the closest. Now, high tides occur exactly where the poles of the moon are opposite the water and therefore also on the opposite side of the earth.

Now, this force that causes the tides is not magnetism at all. Rather, just as the sun disrupts the magnetic forces on earth, so too can “gravity” be influenced and the moon can cause the tides.

53

[ConcaveEarth.net]

## 7. Own experiments and tests

7.1 Experiment to determine the curvature of light

Professor Maurice Allais managed to prove the bending of light using truly spartan equipment. This equipment should be just about affordable for schoolchildren.

So we got hold of a reflecting telescope and started our measurements. The location for the experiment was a cellar measuring approximately 10x12 meters. The distance from the telescope to the measuring beam was then measured. This was approximately 8.5 meters. It was important for this experiment that the room temperature and thus the air layers remained constant. This was almost the case in the cellar. We just wanted to confirm the result of Allais’ experiment and these almost constant conditions were perfectly fine for that.

Allais proved that light bent by around 1.5 millimeters at a distance of 8.3 meters, and that this happened every 24 to 25 hours. This undermined the Copernican system. One can no longer assume that light is straight.

This same experimental result needed to be repeated and confirmed. We left the entire system for about a day and then took measurements, which showed that the light moves by about one to two millimeters.

The test was therefore confirmed. We can rule out any possible objections that the apparatus may have moved, as the system was checked several times and did not experience any malfunctions. Furthermore, the test was carried out several times with almost the same result.

Like Professor Allais, we also succeeded in removing the basis of the rectilinearity of light from the Copernican system.

54

7.2 Construction of a hollow earth half

This is not intended to be a guide aka Disney’s ® Art Attack on how to build a hollow earth model, but short steps are to be explained so that you can follow the construction and understand the effect.

The problem we are dealing with here is the illusion created by a satellite image of the earth. In all satellite images, the earth appears as a solid sphere. Therefore, take a look at the following photograph.

This is an original satellite image of the earth. However, we now want to prove that a “dent” can give the impression of a “bump” when photographing it. So we made a hollow sphere model. We took a standard ball that you can buy in any normal shop. This was our basic shape, which we molded using papier-mâché. We took normal newspaper with wood glue and layered this combination several times on our mold until it was thick enough to hold itself up. However, the hollow sphere half should also be a bit more three-dimensional and relief-like. Therefore, we also molded the land areas, including the mountain ranges, in the same way using newspaper. Finally, it was finished, but only in gray tones, which is why the continents and land areas were colored in the appropriate colors. The result can be seen in this photo.

Nothing has been edited in this image. The earth appears as a solid sphere, like in a satellite image, although it is actually a hollow sphere. As proof, see the last photograph, which shows a side view of the model.

Finally, it was proven that satellite images are useless as evidence of a solid sphere.

55

7.3 Infrared photographs

The infrared photographs that can be seen in this paper were all taken some time ago with plate cameras. However, these are now only museum exhibits - not to mention infrared plates.

Therefore, it was not possible for us to take infrared pictures using a plate camera. However, today some digital cameras also record infrared rays.

Our digital camera had a night vision device that seemed suitable enough for such experiments. However, it is impossible to take pictures with such a device during the day. An infrared filter would be necessary for such an undertaking. Unfortunately, since we have no possible sources of funding, we had to improvise. We learned that black slides are excellent infrared filters. The more you use, the better the picture will be. In fact, it was possible to get some pictures during the day with the help of these slides in front of the lens.

The only possible location was a sufficiently high point that would allow a very wide view. Therefore, we chose the highest point of the Martin Luther Gymnasium and tried to take long-distance photos.

To both of our surprise, pictures were possible, but they did not allow any view of such a vast area – let alone the outlines of any houses.

The improvised infrared filter proved to be useless, at least at greater distances. We were therefore unable to take infrared images of our surroundings. Recently we tried to ask an insulation company to lend us their thermal imaging camera, but this fell on deaf ears. If we get our hands on a thermal imaging camera in the near future, we will be able to provide the infrared images as well.

56

8. Rolf Keppler – descendant of Johannes Kepler

8.1 Biography

The main heading shown above is by no means a typo. Rolf Keppler has family tree books which show that Johannes Kepler himself wrote his name with one or two "p"s during his lifetime. The spelling with only one “p” was used here, as this is how he is generally entered in almost every dictionary today.

Rolf Keppler has been an advocate of the inner world theory for thirteen years and still has an exciting life today. This is reflected, for example, in the various jobs he does. At first he worked in his parents’ bakery and was also a trainer in the children’s gymnastics club. After that he sold and built organ accumulators according to Wilhelm Reich and Eeman grids according to Dr. Eeman. He also sold radionics devices. Finally he worked for the Bosch company and still gives tutoring in mathematics and physics. In his free time he enjoys playing the piano, riding his bike and is an “active” non-smoker.

As far as the inner world view is concerned, he has been committed to it for many years. He has carried out numerous experiments, including the experiment on the Kochertal Bridge.

He is also the person who introduced us to the book “The Hollow Earth Theory” by Johannes Lang. This book has not been available on the book market for some time. Rolf Keppler provides this and many other books in copied form. We are happy that we have found someone who can answer our questions about the hollow earth theory. At this point we would like to say a big thank you to Rolf Keppler.

57

8.2 Interview

First of all, it should be mentioned that Rolf Keppler was very pleased that students could choose the hollow earth theory as a topic for a term paper. Since Rolf Keppler is currently based in Stuttgart, the interview was conducted via email. What follows are our questions and Mr. Keppler’s answers.

Interviewer: Which of the different hollow earth views do you specifically support?

Rolf Keppler: "I support the inner world view that is based on the straight-line publisher and the plumb line experiments. I estimate that I have been supporting this world view for about 13 years now. I think that I have collected enough evidence and clues to show that the full-sphere world view is definitely wrong. I think that the more advanced world view that I have explained on my homepage with the heading “Does a reality exist between the full-sphere world view and the inner world view? " is still worth researching. This world view is explained in the book by Dr. Ernst Barthel, lecturer at the University of Cologne, “Geometry and the Cosmos, without excess and without suppressing small differences”, Otto Hillmann Publishing House, Leipzig, 1939 idea that lies between the full-sphere world and the inner world view. However, it does not contain any basic experiment. I would have to think up this basic experiment first, but I have not done that yet.”

58

Interviewer: Were you also convinced of other world views at that time?

Rolf Keppler: “When I got to know the inner world view, I was not convinced by any other world view.”

Interviewer: Who introduced you to the inner world theory?

Rolf Keppler: "An older acquaintance and friend introduced me to the inner world theory about thirteen years ago. He gave me the booklet “Heaven and Earth” written by Mr. Helmut Diehl, www.weltbildfrage.de. In this book the straight- line publisher is explained in detail. However, it took at least half a year of studying the booklet, with the accompanying “stomach ache”, before I realized that there must be something to it I thought to myself that if “They had invested so much time and money in the experiment with the straight-line publisher in 1897, there must be something to it. It was only at that point that I began to be interested in further evidence and clues.”

Interviewer: Why does this theory seem to you to be the only true one?

Rolf Keppler: "Because it is based on a fundamental experimental test. Not even space travel convinced me. At the beginning of 2004, I wrote to ESA and asked whether they had measured the diameter of Mars on site near Mars. ESA said no and wrote to me that they were basing the Mars diameter measurement on a measurement from the Hubble telescope, which is near Earth.

59

This measurement is useless, however, because it is based on the unmeasured speed of light in space. In the solid sphere view, Mars has a diameter of about 6,800 kilometers and this size would not fit into the hollow sphere Earth with a diameter of about 12,800 kilometers. I couldn’t find any measurements for the diameter of the moon that were close to the moon either. Likewise, some television programs and the book “The Dark Side of Apollo” by Gernot L. Geise about the moon landing lead to the conclusion that the moon landings were fake."

Interviewer: What was the reaction to the spread of the hollow earth theory?

Rolf Keppler: “Unfortunately, this theory is not suitable for being accepted and adopted straight away. In scientific circles in particular, people like to resort to the hollow earth theory, which is based on the mathematical transformation according to Prof. Sexl. However, Prof. Sexl. consciously or unconsciously did not address the experiment with the straight line publisher in his writings, because this experiment is incompatible with the mathematical transformation. However, I have met a few people who have believed in the idea that we live in a hollow spherical earth since childhood, even though these people were not enlightened by a lecture. In my lectures, in contact with the listeners, I experience their incompatibility with previous ideas, which cannot be given up so easily.”

Interviewer: What evidence would you like to provide in the future to prove the correctness of the Earth world?

Rolf Keppler: “Repetition of the experiment on the Kochertal bridge with optical plumb lines and distance measurement at bridge height and valley height. Long-distance photography with infrared photography. Light movement experiment according to Prof. Allais. Even if this experiment is not directly suitable for proving the inner world view, it is nevertheless proof that something fundamental is wrong with the full-sphere world view. From this point of view, the experiment is nevertheless essential for me.”

Interviewer: Do you see parallels between the earthly world and the different religions?

Rolf Keppler: “I would like to concentrate on the physical part of my research. I am less concerned with religious thoughts in terms of inner worldview. You can probably get more information about this from Mr. Diehl, www.weltbildfrage.de. From the age of 16 to 26 I was more of an atheist. It was only from the age of 26 that a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and studying the Bible became essential for me.”

Interviewer: Where do you see points of criticism in the inner world view?

Rolf Keppler: “In order for us to see the stars and planets, a light beam curved upwards is required. However, since there are observations that we can see land again behind an island, a light beam curved downwards is required for this. This contradiction can perhaps only be explained by a fanning out of the light. These two different ways of observing require further investigation and are, for me, still a weak point in the hollow earth theory.”

Interviewer: What do you think of the book “The Hollow Earth Theory” by Johannes Lang?

Rolf Keppler: " He brings many aspects of considerations and natural facts with regard to the inner world view. Johannes Lang was, in a way, the predecessor of Mr. Helmut Diehl. Mr. Diehl accompanied Mr. Johannes Lang for long stretches and later continued his work with an association. I miss the detailed description of the straight-line publisher in the works of Johannes Lang. This only appeared in the booklet “Heaven and Earth” by Mr. Diehl."

Interviewer: What do you think of the book “The Hollow Earth Theory” by Johannes Lang?

Rolf Keppler: " He brings many aspects of considerations and natural facts with regard to the inner world view. Johannes Lang was, in a way, the predecessor of Mr. Helmut Diehl. Mr. Diehl accompanied Mr. Johannes Lang for long stretches and later continued his work with an association. I miss the detailed description of the straight-line publisher in the works of Johannes Lang. This only appeared in the booklet “Heaven and Earth” by Mr. Diehl."

We would like to thank Mr. Rolf Keppler once again for the interview, which provided further perspectives on the hollow earth theory.

62

8.3 Questions about the Earth-world theory and answers

The following questions are taken from Rolf Keppler’s homepage, which he has collected there over several years. They are intended to show that the hollow earth theory is certainly capable of clarifying various phenomena and ambiguities.

Question: When will someone build a straight line installer? Modern measuring methods and materials should eliminate any doubts.

Rolf Keppler: “In my opinion, the straight section layer is too expensive. Today’s costs are around 250,000 to 500,000 euros. Please read the Kochertal Bridge experiment. In my opinion, this would be an equivalent replacement for the experiment with the straight section layer .It costs very little money and can be repeated worldwide.”

Question: The speed of light in space has not yet been measured - that’s not true. The first attempts to calculate the speed of light consisted of observing the moons of a planet. Unfortunately, I don’t remember which planet it was and whether the eclipse or the covering of the moons was used. In any case, the calculations came very close to the known 300,000 kilometers per second.

Rolf Keppler: “As far as I know, the speed of light was measured by Römer on Jupiter’s moons. This measurement was carried out on Earth. The measuring instruments were on Earth. It wasn’t the speed that was measured, but the time. From the distance that has not yet been measured,

63

then the speed is calculated. The speed of light has not yet been measured in a space probe or on a planet. On my homepage it says that a Russian physicist told me that a laser beam directed vertically upwards decreases in frequency. This would indicate a changing speed of light in space. Unfortunately he no longer knows the source of the literature."

Question: Does the cosmos rotate in the Earth and the crust stand still, or vice versa?

Rolf Keppler: “The answer is relative. In my opinion, the Earth’s crust is embedded in something larger. This larger thing can of course also rotate or move and cause the Coriolis force. So it can easily be the case that, to a certain extent extent, the Earth’s crust moves with the larger thing. In addition, there is the relative movement between the planetary system and the Earth’s crust.”

Question: We know that heat “moves” from the warmer object to the colder object. Your model assumes that the Earth has a hot lava mantle on the outside.
Why doesn’t the interior of the hollow earth heat up, even though the universe has existed for several billion years?

Rolf Keppler: “If the earth were only considered as a physical system, the interior would have to heat up unbearably. However, the hollow spherical earth is a living organism in the inner world view. A living organism, like humans and animals, has the ability to regulate heat. The earth in the inner world view is not by chance through a

64

Big Bang. The inner world earth was created by an intelligence that built in a heat regulator, the mechanism of which has not yet been fully explained. I think that the “ether” plays an important role in heat regulation. It may be possible to convert heat back via this ether. Pioneers in physics have made approaches to researching the ether."

Question: What do we think of “interstellar space travel”? Where do aliens come from if not from the sphere of fixed stars? Can living beings exist on other planets if they don’t exist?

Rolf Keppler: "The film about Area 51 convinced me of the existence of extraterrestrials. […] Crashed UFOs are stored and examined there. UFOs can directly influence gravity. This allows them to fly in zigzags. I could imagine that UFOs can also fly through the Earth’s crust. As far as I’ve heard, the first astronauts on the moon were unable to leave the space shuttle for several hours because of the extraterrestrials The TV viewers had to wait “If NASA were to reveal the truth about the UFO phenomenon to the public, people would no longer see any point in fighting each other. Since NASA has no interest in peace, it is sticking to its policy of secrecy.”

Further questions and answers are available on Rolf Keppler’s homepage, which is listed in the sources section.

65

9th Coda

9.1 Evaluation of the survey

You can see the survey on the hollow earth theory that we carried out in one of the physics courses for the twelfth graders at the Martin Luther Gymnasium in the appendix. This was already evaluated in the course of the work, but we will now go into the individual points in more detail. The appendix also contains a spatial pie chart for each of the questions, which we will now refer to.

The basic question deals with the students’ way of thinking. The DH0 diagram in the appendix clearly shows that there are a lot of realistic thinkers. Unfortunately, however, it must be noted that this reality gradually disappeared as the questions that followed were answered. The people who thought realistically but also believed in God were interesting. However, this combination only occurred twice. There were also some people who described themselves as optimistic. Optimists are people who underestimate difficulties and like to go along with the majority. Such people avoid problems by trying to see the good in them and carry on as before. This is also the problem of many Copernican scientists who, through optimism, become so enamored with their world view that they become unable to recognize the madness in their explanations.

The first question deals with the personal world view. Prophetically, as can be seen in diagram DH1, many people hold the acentric world view. The other prescribed world views, including the earth world view, all appear at zero percent. Surprisingly, some people also hold their own, personal world view. Two of them, who also believe in God, based the creation story on the Big Bang. In history, however, many things that God had to serve as a reason for have been revised with increasing experience. Perhaps the same is true of the Big Bang, but perhaps not - time will tell us.

Secondly, it was a small thought experiment, the outcome of which could actually be determined based on one’s world view. Six people ticked the actual observed outcome of the experiment. This would prove, however, that they were convinced that the Earth was a hollow sphere. The relationship to question number five is therefore interesting, in which all six people could not imagine living on the inside of the Earth. The result is, as already mentioned during the term paper, that the question was not properly thought through and was simply ticked randomly.

The straight-line installer, which the third question was about, was completely unknown. Some people said it was nonsense and tried to counter it by citing the unevenness of the earth. However, this is not true at all, since it was the sea level that was leveled and not the land area. They also wrote that the earth looks convex and not concave in satellite images, or when you stand by the sea and look into the distance. They recognized this correctly and this is exactly what the straight-line installer, which was supposed to prove that the earth was convex, was referring to. However, the exact opposite was proven, thereby simultaneously disproving the straightness of light.

The concave curvature of the earth is also proven by the diverging plumb lines in the Tamarack mine in the USA. This was the subject of the fourth question, the graphical distribution of which can be seen in diagram DH4. What is interesting about this question is that two people were aware of the experiment and were convinced by it. But here too, attempts were made to find counterarguments, which were already analyzed and refuted during the thesis.

67

Question number five tried to find out whether one could even imagine living on the inside of the earth. Some of the respondents could, but the majority could not. However, they now had to find a way to prove that the earth is spherical. One person was of the opinion that this would simply come from “hopefully common sense”. Franz Grillparzer already said “The mind and the ability to use it are two different gifts”. So one should not rely on what one sees, but try to see more than the eyes can perceive. Furthermore, one respondent wanted to prove the convex curvature with the help of a “set square and protractor”. But that is exactly what was done with the straight line spreader. The result has already been mentioned many times in this paper. Actually, no one provided any really useful proof. Many just wrote that they couldn’t imagine how such a “giant” universe could fit into the small earth. But this fact has already been mentioned.

Ultimately, an analogy was drawn between the cell and the cosmos. Now it was time to comment on this analogy. One respondent agreed with the statement, but put the sun in place of the cell nucleus. He didn’t say what the cell wall was supposed to represent. Some are convinced that this analogy is entirely possible, because “processes that are connected in a cycle also take place in the cell.” For example, the non-existence of the moon would be a great loss, because it causes the tides. But some people were of the opinion that a cell cannot be compared to the cosmos. Why shouldn’t it? Both have life in common and also serve to sustain life.

Someone aptly wrote that the “model of the cosmos is only imposed” and therefore a false idea develops. We couldn’t have said it better ourselves.

68

9.2 Current fictitious status assuming the Earth world

The fact is that if the correctness of the Earth theory had been recognized back then, we would be at a completely different level of technology and science today. However, the Copernican world view should not be ignored, because it was also beneficial for science and made decisive progress. Furthermore, the assertiveness of the heliocentric world view showed that there can be other ideas that can certainly hold their own against the church.

Since there are many things that cannot be explained with the Copernican worldview, it becomes more and more of a hindrance to development over time, just like the guild system in the Middle Ages. An analogy can be drawn here. While the guild system in the Middle Ages was supportive and revolutionary in terms of the “job market”, it also became more and more of a hindrance over time, until it was replaced by a new economic system, which also brought it forward again. The latter can also be applied to our current, assumed worldview.

What we are trying to say is that, regardless of whether the hollow earth is right or wrong, it could significantly advance science and technology, because it shows that there can be theories besides the Copernican world view that can explain the unexplained phenomena.

The ether is of crucial importance here. While Einstein denies the existence of the ether, the inner world theorists affirm it. Here too, it is important that Einstein started from an incorrect measurement that was unable to prove the existence of an “ether wind”. The starting point for this was the experiment by the American Albert Michelson. He wanted to measure the “ether wind” striking a cellar vault.

69

However, he used a completely unsuitable apparatus that did not allow him to detect such a wind. Over the years, however, these measuring devices were improved more and more until it was finally possible to detect fluctuating ether winds on Mount Wilson. In the inner world, the ether is necessary to transmit light or other electromagnetic waves. Its existence also corresponds to human logic, because no one can imagine how, for example, gravity can work over empty space. The conclusion is therefore that an ether - and thus also free energy - exists.

With its help, energy can now be generated for free. The fact that something like this is possible is demonstrated, for example, by Daniel Dingel’s water car. This car uses around five liters of water for 500 kilometers. However, according to calculations, Dingel would need 147 liters for the same distance. Where does the rest of the energy come from? As hard as it may seem to believe, Dingel has built a “perpetuum mobile”. A device that gives off more energy than it puts in. Dingel has overturned the first law of thermodynamics, which states that “energy can neither be created nor destroyed”. Let that last sentence sink in once more. Dingel himself says that his discovery is so simple that everyone would laugh if he were to patent it. It is based only on common sense, which makes the invention so simple and functional.

In Switzerland there is another device, the Testatika, which apparently generates three kilowatts of energy from “nothing”. However, information about this “machine” is withheld, with the words: “Humanity is not yet ready for it.” The recognition of the hollow earth theory with free energy would advance science and technology considerably. As Dingel says, the application is so simple and syllogistic that a patent on it is not worth it. But why can’t we find the solution?

70

9.3 Conclusion

Let us remember the question that was mentioned at the beginning of the foreword to this paper. It was “Has the Copernican system been proven?” After reading this paper, you will certainly have come across some inconsistencies, absurdities and dissonances in Copernicanism that you had never heard of before. It is certainly difficult to break away from the idea of ​​a solid spherical earth, but the examples and experimental attempts given should at least have made you think. Ultimately, with the effect that you think about the hollow earth theory and really think about it. The more you philosophize about it and learn about it, the more you become aware of the harmony that this theory contains. Perhaps you now think that there is a little too much harmony and that the whole thing is really almost too simple to be true. But we are reminded here of the water car - the “perpetuum mobile” - by Daniel Dingel, who managed to override the law of conservation of energy stated by Helmholtz. Dingel himself says of his ominous “converter” that it works so simply that it wouldn’t be worth registering a patent for it. Why shouldn’t the events in the “universe” also work as simply and harmoniously as Daniel Dingel’s discovery? Why complicate something that is actually so simple?

The hollow earth theory is a living organism, the way in which our organism works is not so foreign to us - we could even assume it to be adequate. You will probably be wondering why the hollow earth theory has not been generally accepted yet. This is due to human experience. Experience teaches us that the curvature of the earth is convex as soon as we are by the sea and look into the distance. As soon as we stand in the forest in the morning and the air is still damp, we can see for ourselves that the light is straight. But these are all experiences that arise from incorrect perception of the sensory organs. Even in Buddhism, it is believed that our sensory perception only leads us astray and gives us false images. This is the reason why the inner world theory has not yet prevailed.

The purpose of this paper was to explain the inner world theory, to show people that there are other ideas about how our world works that correspond to the human mind. We think we have succeeded in doing this to some extent. However, we are by no means as well versed as Rolf Keppler or Helmut Diehl, who have been studying the inner world for countless years. We would therefore like to thank Rolf Keppler once again for answering our questions about the inner world theory and for agreeing to do an interview with us.

The above-mentioned question can be answered with a final “no”. Copernicanism lacks any evidence. Evidence that would be necessary in order to declare the inner world view to be false. In our opinion, this evidence will never follow, because there is already evidence on the earth side that, in its original form, should actually confirm a convex curvature, but did exactly the opposite. We have already dealt with the fact that the recognition of the hollow earth theory would be of great benefit to science and technology in one of the previous points. The fact that Johannes Lang discovered Quaoar before the Copernicans speaks for the progressiveness of the inner world. Perhaps the inner world theory is now a painful truth for some, or perhaps a thorn in the side. Thomas Mann said this, which is also what we would like to conclude the paper with:

“A painful truth is better than a lie.”

72

10th Appendix

Survey – Inner World Cosmos

If you ask astronomers what world view they support, they prophetically answer with the Copernican world view. In the Copernican sense, the earth is convex and is on a revolutionary elliptical orbit around the sun, the entire distance of which it covers in 365 days. In addition to the sun, other planets also orbit our central star. If you ask these same astronomers why the earth is round, they will base this question on the existence of a horizon. If you ask them again why there is a horizon, they will base it on the spherical shape of the earth.

This contradiction, or lack of proof, is just one of many in the Copernican system. This survey for a research paper is intended to capture the generally prevailing opinions on this and to introduce another theory - the theory of the concave earth, namely the earth -world theory or the inner world cosmos.

Please tick only one box at a time except for number 0.

0. I am a …

realistic thinking person.

philosophically thinking person.

God-believing person.

---

1. What worldview do you represent?

antiquity

worldview of Socrates/Plato

Aristotelian worldview Middle Ages

Biblical worldview

worldview of Thomas Aquinas
Renaissance

Copernican worldview

worldview of Tycho Brahe modern times

acentric worldview

inner world theory
Other

My personal worldview

(Please describe in short, concise sentences)

73

2. The Sailing Ship Experiment

The captain of a sailing ship has hung a cloth parallel to the deck and between the two masts, which has been dyed red on the side facing the deck and left white on the upper side. To enhance the effect of the red side, reflectors have been attached to the deck to reflect the sunlight. The observers in the harbor are now supposed to predict the outcome of the experiment as soon as the ship disappears behind the “horizon”. Which side of the cloth will disappear or become more visible?

The red area emerges and the white disappears

The white area emerges and the red area disappears

None at all, both colors mix

3. The straight line installer

In 1897 in Naples (Florida), UG Morrow and his straight-line surveyor proved that the earth had a concave rather than a convex curvature. The instruments he used were extremely accurate and ultimately a difference of 6.25 m was determined, with the earth bulging upwards. This proved that the earth had a concave curvature.

I haven’t heard of this experiment yet

I know this experiment and am convinced

I think it’s nonsense because…

4. The diverging plumb lines

In 1901, two engineers sank two plumb lines 1300 m into the earth’s surface in the Tamarack mine - Calumet USA. The measurements that followed showed that the plumb lines moved apart with increasing depth, instead of coming closer together as originally planned. This process was repeated several times under the direction of Professor Mc. Nair, always with the same result.

Here, too, we see a concave curvature of the Earth.

I haven’t heard of this experiment yet

I know this experiment and am convinced

I think it’s nonsense because…

74

5. Could you imagine living on the inside of the Earth, a concave planet?

Yes

No.
But how would you prove the convex shape of the earth, taking into account that light bends and thus only gives the illusion of a round earth in “space”?

(Light curvature is proven )

6. Please comment on the following statement.

Take a cell, created by nature. Its structure enables many living creatures to exist - and man is the measure of all things. All life processes take place in it. One is therefore a microcosm. A section through a cell is also a section through the cosmos. There is therefore an analogy between cell and cosmos. The earth’s shell corresponds to the cell membrane, the cell nucleus is the sphere of fixed stars, the central body is the sun and the nuclear bodies are the planets. The cell is a hollow sphere that shows the same conditions as the hollow sphere of the earth.

7. Have you ever been abducted by aliens?

Yes of course.

Yes, they were quite nice.

No, never.

No, but I have seen some before.

No, hopefully never.

I’m not so sure, I was still little.

My parents are aliens.

Would be nice.

Thank you for answering the survey.

75

10.2 Survey diagrams

The following are the diagrams of the survey, analyzed in percentage terms. The survey can also be found in the appendix of this paper.

76

77

10.3 Further Poetry

As already mentioned several times, the basis of the thesis was the book “The Hollow Earth Theory” by Johannes Lang. In addition, he also wrote another part, the processing of which was not necessary for the thesis, since it is more or less congruent with the first part.

Helmut Diehl, a friend of Rolf Keppler, wrote a little book called “Heaven and Earth.” This book was the one that convinced Mr. Keppler of the inner world view. It contains a precise description of the process of the straight-line publisher and also goes into the religious background of the inner world view.

It has been known since reading this paper that the Copernican system is full of contradictions. However, anyone who would like to know more about this topic should read the book “The Contradictions in Astronomy” by Dr. Carl Schoepffer. It describes the absurdities that arise when assuming the heliocentric world view. Walter K. Wavruska wrote two parts entitled “Does humanity need a new world view?” In these books, the inner world view is again addressed and explained in almost every detail.

It should be noted, however, that all of the books mentioned have actually disappeared from the book market. Ultimately, they can still be obtained in copied form from Rolf Keppler, who thus ensures the “survival” of the lost books.

Not only books provide information about the earth, but also the internet. The source list contains internet addresses where you can find out more about the inner world view. A main focus is on Rolf Keppler’s homepage, which can answer all questions about the hollow earth theory. So anyone who is interested in further poetry should get hold of the books mentioned to delve even deeper into the inner world.

78

10.4 Source reference

book sources

Johannes Lang – “The New Worldview”

Gianluca Ranzini – “Astronomy”

Joachim Grehn – “Metzler Physics”

online sources

www.rolf-keppler.de

Homepage of Rolf Keppler, through which we first became aware of the inner world picture

http://www.innenweltkosmos.de

Homepage of Helmut Diehl, who is friends with Rolf Keppler. Through him, Rolf Keppler was convinced of the earth’s world.

http://www.weltbildfrage.de
Also a homepage by Helmut Diehl, which deals with the inner world view, but addresses concrete questions.

Graphic representation and diagrams

All drawings and diagrams were created by us. The only inspiration we got after the drawings were made was the book “The Hollow Earth Theory” by Johannes Lang.

photographs

Reference - www.rolf-keppler.de

Mount Chasta - 533km.jpg

New York - fernnewyork3.jpg

satellite image - image001.jpg