Various Concave Earth forum posts from around the web (Compilation)(Continuously Updating)

[TRUEMODELOFTHEWORLD]

This thread is intended to house various useful / decent posts regarding concave earth spread throughout the web.

Source Concave Earth Theory | Page 9 | stolenhistory.net - Rediscovered History of the World

source

In order from outside to inside:

Earth’s metallic crust —> Lava (Molten Metal ) —> Biosphere (Earth ) —> Crystal Sphere (Raw Material: Pure Silica ) —> Planets (In order: Moon > Venus > Mercury > Sun > Mars > Jupiter > Saturn > Uranus > Neptune > Pluto) —> Celestial Sphere (Firmament) —> Central Sun (Cosmic Egg / Celestial Fire of Alchemists / Central Fire of Pythagoreans / Primum Mobile) —> Central Point of the Creation (Beginning, Empyrean, Chaos)

(Related image: The author of the cartograph is Guillaume Testu (1509-1573), from Cosmographie Universelle, 1555 )

No creature on the Earth can cross the glass ceiling! Everything that has happened has always happened here, is happening, and will continue to happen. This barrier cannot be overcome , neither by external nor internal intervention!

Above the planets is the Firmament or the Celestial Sphere, as it is most commonly used. Stars are holes in the Celestial Sphere, sort of like Pores (holes) in the cell nucleus. The stars enable the transfer of energy from the inside to out. The Celestial Sphere is the last layer that humanity can observe, beyond this is invisible to humanity unless certain conditions are met!

Inside the Celestial Sphere is the Primum Mobile (Prime Mover), also known as the Central Sun. The Central Sun is the heart/hearth of the Earth, the source of the fire that alchemists call the "Celestial Fire ".

(Related images: The Empyrean heaven is within the Primum Mobile.)

"According to Pernety, the purest grade of fire was the white Celestial Fire, or the fiery power of God’s will . He described it thus: “The Celestial Fire is very pure, simple and not burning in itself . It has for its sphere the ethereal region , when it makes itself known even to us. Celestial Fire shines without burning and is without color and odor, though it is sensibly exhaled. It is gentle and known only by its operations.”

The Central Sun is the source that gives shape to the entire material world, breathes life into all living things, radiates aether , and provides movement in the universe. It is also referred to as “The Sun Behind The Sun” in some places.

source Concave Earth Theory | Page 9 | stolenhistory.net - Rediscovered History of the World
Within the Central Sun is the Empyrean heaven, the starting point of creation . I don’t know much about what’s going on in Empyrean. However, it is written that the fire that the alchemists call the "Central Fire " is located here.

.

.

Source The Concave Earth Hypothesis

THE CONCAVE EARTH HYPOTHESIS

This hypothesis was first conceptualised in the Cellular Cosmogony of Cyrus R Teed, founder of the Koreshan Religion/Society established in 1886. He stated that the Earth is concave (curving upward), thus we are on the inside of a hollow Sphere. All of the stars and planets are illusions due to refraction of curving light in the atmosphere, of which itself is illusory in the general appearance of its shape. Only one half of the sun radiates light, it rotates on an axis at the centre of the hollow cell, and we only ever see a focalised projection of it through multiple layers of the atmosphere.

Accordingly this cosmology was revealed to Teed during a visionary experience in which a female angel showed him the “true” nature of the cosmos, where the heavens revolve inside the hollow cell of the earth.

Astrology of the Cellular Cosmogony

1.1 Inversion Geometry:

In 1981 Mostafa Abdelkader an Egyptian mathematician from Alexandria, revived and expanded upon Karl E Neupert’s Geocosmos version of Cyrus’ Ideas, from the year 1900. Unlike Cyrus’ model which considers the heavenly bodies entirely as optical illusions, Neupert’s model inverts the entire known cosmos into the concave model, stating that space shrinks / implodes via non-euclidean geometry, so as to fit an entire Copernican cosmos (C) into the comparatively finite boundary-envelope of the Geocosmos’ (G) concave surface. In his paper that he submitted to the Australian science journal; Speculations in Science and Technology, in 1981 (which then gave a serious peer review of his full hypothesis in its 6th volume edition published in 1983), Abdelkader says:

“The enormous galaxies and other remote objects are mapped inside as microscopic objects, and our moon as by far the largest of the celestial objects, all of which revolve daily around the earth’s axis. Straight rays of light are mapped as arcs of circles, so that all celestial phenomena appear to inside observers in G just as they do to outside observers in C. We next consider the hypothesis that, conversely, our actual universe is this finite G." (This idea entails the inversion of all known geo/astro physics.)

The main addition to Neupert’s concept which Abdelkader addressed, is that light is eventually pulled toward the centre of the cosmos which shrinks inward. The arcs of light which travel toward the surface of the earth are absorbed, and those that are not continue travelling toward the centre of the cosmos as well as around it to the opposite side of the heavens than the sun. However they never illuminate the other side of the earth or its night sky because the wavelengths of light flow in accordance with the volume of space beyond the earth’s surface, and are also subject to the black-hole like inertia of the cosmoses infinitesimal centre. Thus as they converge toward the opposite position of the heavens to where the sun is, they are simultaneously pulled in toward the centre.

Therefore the light which circles round to the opposite side of the heavens, never meets the sight of those who have the centre of the cosmos between them and the sun. Therefore an observer on the surface will experience night without a luminous sky, even though rays of light are actually traversing the space they look out into, this being because the rays are only in space and thus are never received directly into the eye.

(for those FES forum explorers who are limited in English terminology, “Geology” is the study of the shape of the Earth, its properties and in some sense its relation to the rest of the cosmos. Hence the name Geocosmos as in this model the Earth is the boundary of the cosmos)

Abdelkader’s Concave Earth

Abdelkader devised an equation that suggests the phenomena belonging to the perception of the sky-dome and horizon line, are subject to optical illusion, supporting his statement that Light bends in wide arcs through space, rather than travelling in straight paths. As such when we believe we are looking at a luminous astrological object perpendicular to our line of sight, what we are seeing actually lies on the other end of a bent ray of light. Thus ones line of sight is really pointing at nothing, and their eyes are receiving an image of something that is at a position in the sky elsewhere to the direction they are truly looking.

This arcing nature of light therefore would attribute illusion to the perception of phenomena in the sky and space. However it is not just the light alone that produces this illusion, but also the magnetic field of the earth and gravity which causes the light to behave extraordinarily.
Double refraction and re-focalisiation of light was the explanation Teed offered for the sky-dome Illusion. Teed’s model however theorised a stationary sun with which he attributed the bizare notion that it were really a focalsied point of light emanating from a rotating luminous double helix at the centre of the cosmos. Abdelkader’s model on the other hand requires more elaboration as it entertains an orbiting sun rather than a stationary one.

---

1.2 The Mechanics of Gravity/Levity (Earth’s EMF) & The Propogation of Light

To fully comprehend the theory of how light behaves in the Geocosmos, one must entertain the notion that the Earth’s magnetic field and Gravity are really opposite polarities of the same unified force. This force compounds on itself through the envelope of the Geocosm i.e. the spherical area around the outside of the Geocosmos (within the crust.)

In other words Gravity or Centripetal force as Teed believed it to be, radiates out from the centre of the cosmos and through the earth’s concave crust where it then
folds/compresses against the inside of the concave earth’s outer boundary/envelope (below the crust) then, due to it being a continuously flowing force, it therefore flows back outward to the surface at double the frequency (as it has folded/compressed against itself) and becomes the Earth’s Levic electromagnetic field EMF.

How this concept of Gravity/Levity is relevant to the behaviour of light in the Geocosmos is that as the light reaches its resonant threshold of the EMF it begins to compress/slow down with friction causing an inverted compression of its wavelength within ratio to the Earths EMF.

A way to help visualise this is to take the example of a blown up rubber glove and how one can push the gloves fingers into the inside of the blown up glove provided the air pressure isn’t too high. However this analogy is only outlining the path of the light as in reality it is in constant flow, from both the sun, moon, planets, stars and any other astrological phenomena.

This means: that because one sees what’s on the other end of the arcing rays of light, and that the path of light is also folding back on itself against the Earth’s EMF, then focalising back down toward the earth before our eyes receive it, the optical information that our eyes receive of the EMF threshold/light resonance layer is therefore reversed. Similar to how the reflection of a spoon is upside down and slightly distorted depending on the angle one views it from.
This accounts for the unexplained phenomena (Dubbed the Moon Illusion) of why objects in the sky look larger on the horizon than they do directly overhead. It also explains why one instead sees the Sky-dome/horizon line as a concave dome-illusion rather than a convexly implied display of concentric atmosphere/void as one would expect it to appear.

Thus when one sees the sun cross below the horizon what it would actually be doing is moving up and around into the zone of the SP’s influence where the circular paths of light progressively get pulled into the SP and hence day becomes night. Abdelkader emphatically points out that both his and Einstein’s concepts of the properties of light are assumptions as no one has proven either view.

Substantial Evidence That Light Bends (video)

---

1.3 The Optical Illusion of the Earth Ball in Space:

In the October 1983 issue, Omni Magazine inquired with H.S.M. Coxter, a maths professor of the University of Toronto , as to whether or not there was any way to prove we aren’t living inside a hollow earth. Coxter responded saying he couldn’t think of any, and being an expert on inversion geometry went on to say:

“A rocket flight, an eclipse, a Foucault pendulum a Coriolis effect – any observation we can make on the outside of the earth has an exact duplicate version inside. There would be no way to tell which was the truth."

The article continued to relay: “Just as the geometry of space inverts, so do all the laws of physics. Toward the centre of a hollow Earth, light slows down and everything shrinks – atoms, astronauts, spaceships, and measuring rods. Light travels in circular paths, producing some weird (but lawful) optical effects. Astronauts on the moon looked back on what they thought was a blue sphere in the distance. Actually it was the inside of the earth’s shell, seen through sight lines that flared like the bell of a trumpet, producing the illusion of a sphere. The optical distortion is something like the wide angle view through a fish-eye lens”.

The German NASA astronaut & physicist - Werner Von Braun, speaks of this convex spherical illusion of our planet in the (inner) outer space of the concave Earth in one of his papers regarding optical illusions in space. He explains the process by which a “photograph of the Earth ball” (“Convex Earth”) occurs, a potentially illusory perception of which our arbitrary physical senses have lead us to believe.

---

2.1 Phases of the Moon and Lunar/Solar Eclipses

The Following was harvested from:Phases of the Moon and Lunar/Solar Eclipses

The sketch below shows a horizontal section through the geocosmos. One has to be aware, that in reality the earth envelopes a spherical space which means that any radiation goes in all directions. You can easily do that in your mind by making the drawing rotate around its vertical axis.

[This image is synonymous with the shape of a Torus Field]

The drawing shows the moon in its different phases. If the light hits the moon from the back, the side facing the earth is dark and we have a new moon. If the light hits the moon from the side we half a half moon. At a full moon it is radiated by light from all sides which then return to the celestial sphere.

The moon will reflect any light received back to the earth on certain curved paths, which have been shown earlier. This makes it possible that all the phases of the moon including the crescent can be seen.

Exactly opposite the sun is a funnel like night canal without any light, since it can not be reached by any light beams. Since all the curves of light are equally curved, the cross section of that canal is round. When the moon passes through it then we have a total lunar eclipse. If the moon only touches the canal a little, then we have a partial eclipse. The moon will then show a dark (light less) disk, which, according to the Copernican theory is interpreted as the shadow of the earth.

Usually the moon bypasses the night canal, since it does not orbit in the same plane as the sun, thus preventing a lunar eclipse and having a full moon instead. For the same reason we seldom see a solar eclipse. If the new moon would always pass in the direction of the sun, then we would have a solar eclipse any time we have a new moon. However, most the time the moon bypasses the sun so far north or south, that it does not cover the sun.

More details can be found in the book by Johannes Lang: “The Geocosmic Theory” (Not yet available in English.)

.
.
source The Cellular Cosmogony: Optical Factors and Illusions

p. 31

Optical Factors and Illusions

The Proofs of Cellular Cosmogony Contrasted With Assumptions

IT IS ASSUMED by those who profess to believe in and advocate the Copernican system of astronomy, that the earth is convex because it appears so from optical observation. A person standing upon a tower and looking out in every direction will see the vanishing point at an equal distance, and the horizon (the limit of geolinear vision) describes a circle around this center of observation. This fact in appearance is taken as an assumption of the earth’s convexity, because it is claimed that nothing but a globe would thus respond to and impress itself upon the organs of vision.

We maintain that an assumption predicated upon an optical illusion is not sufficient ground for the establishment of a rational conviction. If the earth were a perfectly flat surface extended illimitably, an observation from a tower looking out in every direction would assume, to the eye, the appearance of a circular horizon, for the simple reason that geolinear fore-shortening would provide for a vanishing point at a given distance from the observer, proportionate to the elevation of the point from which the observation is taken.

If a person will stand upon a railroad track equidistant between two rails, the rails will seem to approach each other in the distance, the apparent contact, or vanishing point, being proportioned to the

p. 32

space between the rails and the height of observation… If they are five feet apart, the vanishing point is less than if they were six or seven feet apart.

Suppose we take a geolinear extense on the surface of the earth as one rail, and an imaginary line through the air as the other, placing the eye two and one half feet from the earth’s surface. Now, the same law obtains in looking parallel along this surface, as

Deceptive Appearances

in looking parallel to the rail and along its side. Making our observation by the side of the rail, the vanishing point is reached and the rail disappears, although extended in a straight line far beyond the vanishing point. The line over which observation is taken along the surface of the earth is the geolinear extense; it corresponds to the rail, and disappears by the same law; namely, that of foreshortening.

Appearances vs. Facts

The phenomenon of the disappearance of a ship, hull first, as it recedes from view, is caused by the same law of foreshortening as that which governs the disappearance of the rail, or causes the two rails to appear to approach each other. If we should make calculations on the basis of the appearance instead of on the basis of the fact that the rails do not approach, but only seem to, we necessarily draw false conclusions. This is precisely what the astronomers do. They conclude from appearances rather than from facts.

A balloon six or seven miles distant, appearing about the size of a pin head, if it be sixty feet in diameter, occupies as much space in the distance as when near the subjective point of observation. The law by which the balloon appears to diminish in size as it recedes from view, is the same as that which produces geolinear foreshortening, or which makes the surface of the earth diminish longitudinally as extending from the point of observation.

This phenomenon belongs to the organ of vision, and cannot be comprehended only as we possess a correct knowledge of the laws and phenomena of optics. Owing to this fact, the student cannot comprehend the principles involved in the phenomena of optical appearances and illusion without a thorough comprehension of the principles and laws of optics.

In another part of this volume the reader will find a complete record of the mechanical apparatus and processes by which we have so absolutely demonstrated the concavity of the earth as to over-shadow the fallacious conclusions of the mountebanks,–Copernicus, et al, and their deluded followers.

p. 34

[paragraph continues] We place a brief study of optics before the reader, merely to show wherein the fallacious conclusions of modern, so called science, while conflicting with the discovered and projected truth, are drawn not from facts but from appearances.

The Laws of Visual Impression

It might appear, as we proclaim the fact that a thorough knowledge of the Koreshan Cosmogony demands a thorough knowledge of optics, that it is our purpose to set forth a complete optical treatise preparatory to an understanding of the Koreshan Cosmogony. A thorough knowledge of Koreshanity must necessarily be a question of growth. A slight knowledge of the laws of optics will enable the student to see the discrepancies of modern astronomy, as predicated upon a misinterpretation of appearances.

What we behold through the organs of vision depends entirely upon the imprint of objectivities upon the retina of the eye. What we see is merely a picture placed upon the lining coat of the eyeball, and thence carried through the optic nerve, optic commissure, and optic tract, to that cortical area upon which the final function of vision depends.

We refer to a diagram setting forth some of the correlated facts of vision. The reader’s attention is again called to the explicit study of the effects of subjective impression, or the imprint or picturing of the objective world upon the retinal coat. (See retinal coat in Diagram 1, Plate 1, with the area b b as the film upon which the imprint is laid.)

The picture upon the retina includes whatsoever is embraced in the obtense between the two lines 1, 2, 3, 4; a a a is the optical axis, d is the point of the appearance of the ship when the hull vanishes, as it

Click to enlarge
DIAGRAM No. 1. Illustrating ‘‘The Laws of Visual Impression.’’ Pages 34-36.
This Diagram Illustrates a Principle, not Measurements True to Scale; the Height of the Objects Is not Proportioned to the Distance.

Click to enlarge
DIAGRAM No. 2. The Rectilineator Used in the Koreshan Geodetic Survey. Page 39.

Click to enlarge
DIAGRAM No. 3. Illustrating the Illusions of Optical Phenomena. Pages 39-40.

Click to enlarge
DIAGRAM No. 4. Comprehensive View of the Air Line, Showing Use of the Rectilineator in Survey of Chord of Arc by the Koreshan Geodetic Staff at Naples, Fla. Pages 39-42-181.

p. 35

recedes from view, as observed from the subjective x. The dotted lines indicate the appearance of the actual lines 1, 2, 3, 4, while d is the apparent position of the ship observed from x (the subjective point), and c, the ship as it actually is, viewed from its location in fact, not in appearance as at d. The perpendicular space 1, 1, implants the picture f h; the space 2, 2, implants the picture e g.

It will be noticed that the picture imprinted from 2, 2, at e g, is shorter than the one imprinted from 1, 1, at f h, proportionately as the distance from 1, 1, to 2, 2, in the objective. It follows that if a picture is imprinted from 3, 3, at b b, the ratio of shortening at b b will correspond to the imprints, 1, 1, and 2, 2. If lines were drawn from the points 4, 4 to the film b b through the focus at B, the subtense of the angle from 4, 4 to B would be so acute as to obliterate the space at the center of the film b b.

The point of obliteration at the film or retina, b b, corresponds to the vanishing point in the objective at d. At d the hull of the ship disappears, because there is no longer room for the picture upon the retina.

The lower line 1, 2, 3, 4 is the geolinear extense; the line upon the ground appearing at d, the vanishing point and the horizon. The upper line may represent a cloud covering the sky. The two points 4, 4, appear to join at d because of the distal foreshortening, which it must be remembered is merely the result of changes upon the retina, effected by distance. Any object beyond the ship c, as seen at d, will settle out of sight on the geolinear surface, proportionately to its distance beyond 4, 4.

By comparing the spaces w w with the spaces y y, it can readily be seen how the area of a given space

p. 36

appears to shorten, and narrows itself upon the retinal coat. Now if we remove the upper line 1, 2, 3, 4 and open up the space above, an object at P may imprint itself upon the retina; but an object at Q could not be seen because it is below the ground surface, which, though it might extend a thousand miles in a straight line, can make no further imprint upon the retina because the space between the lower line 4 and d is the obliterated space, as affecting the retinal film.

We have presented some optical facts upon which depend the appearances upon which rest the fallacies of the Copernican system; facts, a want of the understanding of which places the so called scientists in the catalogue of the incompetents, which graces the contradictory systems of astronomy that arise spontaneously, subserve their purpose, and die the death of the fallacious in the various careers of mental transformation, as the human mind gropes its way in darkness.

.
.
source The Cellular Cosmogony: The Cellular Cosmogony

# THE CELLULAR COSMOGONY

Koreshan Universology Is Predicated Upon an Absolutely Demonstrated Premise; the World Face to Face with a Radical Astronomical Revolution

KORESHANITY is universal science applied to all the concerns of practical life, involving the science of immortal life in the body. It includes the science of religion, founded upon an accurate knowledge of the structure and function of the cosmic organism. It embraces every department and phase of form and function in the universe, and is therefore Universology. It is predicated upon an absolutely demonstrated premise, a geometric figure which embraces three simple elements–the arc, chord, and radius, practically applied to earth measurement by a process which determines the contour of the surface of the earth in which we dwell, and the direction of its curvation. This is not theoretical, but applied geometry. This contour is found to be an upward instead of a downward curve, and thus it is diametrically opposite to the assumed convexity of the earth’s surface. The world is therefore face to face with a radical astronomical revolution.

The earth is a concave sphere, the ratio of curvation

p. 17

being eight inches to the mile, thus giving a diameter of eight thousand, and a corresponding circumference of about twenty-five thousand miles. This fact is physically and mechanically demonstrated by placing a perpendicular post at any point on the surface of the earth, (though it were better to place it by the side of a surface of water,) and extending a straight line at right angles from this perpendicular. The line thus extended will strike the surface at any distance proportionate to the height of the vertical post.

“Hypothesis, or guesswork, indeed, lies at the foundation of all scientific knowledge,” says the Standard Dictionary, quoting from Fiske’s “Unseen World,” page 3. The term science is derived from scire, to know; hence, science is the Latin term for knowledge. Science means knowledge, nothing more, nothing less. That which is founded upon hypothesis (assumption) is not science, nor should it be dignified by that title. The Copernican system of astronomy has its foundation in assumption,–this is conceded by all so called scientific astronomers. The Copernican system has never been demonstrated, therefore it is not scientific.

What does Koreshanity offer as a substitute for the gigantic fallacy and farce of the benighted Copernicus? First, it offers the fact that in experiments carefully made by the Koreshan Geodetic Staff at Naples, on the Gulf coast of Florida, the contour of the earth was proven to be diametrically the reverse of what is taught as true in the pseudo-science of modern times.

The surface of the earth is not convex. It appears

p. 18

to be so because of optical illusion. The only geodetic survey ever made for the purpose of determining whether the surface on which we dwell is convex or concave, was made by the Geodetic Staff of the Koreshan Unity in the year 1897. In this survey was corroborated conclusively the testimony given in 1870, that the earth is a hollow shell about eight thousand miles in diameter, and about twenty-five thousand miles in circumference.

The Form of the Universe, the Great Alchemico Organic World

The alchemico-organic (physical) world or universe is a shell composed of seven metallic, five mineral, and five geologic strata, with an inner habitable surface of land and water. This inner surface, as the reader already understands, is concave. The seven metallic layers or laminæ are the seven noble metals,–gold constituting the outermost rind of the shell. This shell or crust is a number of miles in thickness.

Within this shell are three principal atmospheres, the first or outermost (the one in which we exist) being composed chiefly of oxygen and nitrogen; the one immediately above that is pure hydrogen, and the one above the hydrogen atmosphere we have denominated aboron. Within this is the solar electromagnetic atmosphere, the nucleus of which is the stellar center. In and occupying these atmospheres are the sun and stars, also the reflections called the planets and the moon.

The planets are mercurial disci moving by electromagnetic impulse between the metallic laminæ or planes of the concave shell. They are seen through penetrable rays, ultra electro-magnetic, reflected or

p. 19

bent back in their impingement on spheres of substance regularly graduated as the stories in the heavens.

In the foregoing is presented a descriptive outline merely, of the alchemico-organo-cosmic form. It is not assumptive. Neither is it intended, in this synopsis, to prove the Koreshan Universology; the proofs and demonstrations of the System will be found in subsequent pages of this work.

Motion and Function

We have already outlined the general principles of form. We here insert this axiom: Form is a fundamental property of existence; therefore, that which has no form has no existence. Limitation is a property of form. The universe has existence; therefore it has form, hence it has limitation. While the above axiom partakes somewhat of the syllogistic method, it will be noticed that the objectionable feature of the syllogism is expunged; namely, the premise is not an assumption.

Motion obtains in everything throughout cosmic form. Nothing exists without motion. The atoms of the rock are constantly changing place with all other atoms. There is circulation in the bar of steel. The angular crystal atoms of the diamond are in motion, and in their circulation and impingement they generate electro-magnetic substance of the most delicate attenuation. All these circulations are regular and according to the fixed laws of order; therefore, while form exists according to definite principles of form, the laws of motion conform to and determine the principles and arrangement of organic relation and shape.

p. 20

Cause of Motion

The cause of alchemico-organic motion is remote and proximate. Before defining the laws and principles of motion, we will here briefly state that within the alchemico-organic world (cosmos) there resides the anthropostic or corresponding cosmos. These are two discrete spheres, yet they are co-ordinately one. The alchemico-organic cosmos (the physical world, the outline of which is given in preceding pages) is in the form of man; that is, in the egg or shell–man in the state of un-incubation.

The mass of humanity is in the same state, with this modification; the alchemico-organic cosmos is in space, and is therefore persistent; while its anthropostic co-ordinate embodies principles which merely correspond to space, and are not persistent in any one form. For instance: The seven metallic laminæ or plates comprising the general metallic rind of the macrocosmic shell are perpetual. These are the seven limitations of essences radiating from the stellar nucleus primarily, and from the solar limbus as the environment of the stellar nucleus. They constitute the deposit extremities of the seven essences, or the seven alchemico-organic spirits of radiation. The geologic strata through which the essences radiate are the conditions of chaos penetrated by the essences before they reach their extremities of metallic deposition and order.

The stellar nucleus is the center of space; the metallic laminæ are at the circumference of space. Correspondentially in humanity, the Lord Christ was the stellar Center, and his quality was the correspondent, in anthropostic being, of space in the

p. 21

alchemico-organic cosmos. In the progress of time in its relation to the development and progress of the race, the seven churches yet to be formulated into groups are the anthropostic depositions corresponding to the seven metallic plates. The seven churches are seven qualities of human characteristics and correspond to the seven planets, and therefore to the seven primary substratic laminæ of the cosmic crust.

By the remote cause of motion is meant the cause primary to the electro-magnetic substance created at and radiating from the stellar nucleus, antithetically generated at the circumference of the shell and converging to the nucleus. The cellular cosmos, or the great cosmic egg previously described, constitutes a great electro-magnetic battery which is purely physical, or, as denominated in Koreshan Science, alchemico-organic. The sun and stars are focalizations of physical spirit-substance, merging into matter materialized through voluminous and high-tension convergence.

There are at these centers constant concretion and sublimation. Spirit-substance is constantly materializing, and the temporary materialization is as rapidly changed to spirit-substance and is radiated. There is, therefore, a reciprocal interchange of substance from center and circumference. The spirit-substances engendered at the nucleus are radiated to the circumference, and are there solidified. At the circumference the surplus solidification is reduced again to spirit-substance and flows to the nucleus.

As there are seven metallic laminæ in the prime circumference, so there are seven prime metallic kinds of essence flowing toward and into the stellar nucleus.

p. 22

[paragraph continues] As these influxes are of seven distinct characteristic vibrations, so the nucleus has seven distinct degrees of essence, all meeting at one focal point in space, there turning back upon themselves and flowing out or radiating to the circumference and depositing at the environments of the cosmos. From the mineral laminæ, geologic strata, and water surface of the universal rind, there is also a corresponding and co-ordinate inflow or convergence to the stellar nucleus.

However, we find in this great universal battery, in its electro-magnetic power, but the proximate cause of its activity and form. Thus far there is no conscious and voluntary spirit-substance. Associated in co-operative being with this alchemico-organic cosmos is another half, endowed with voluntary and involuntary consciousness, co-existent and co-eternal. This voluntary and involuntary conscious existence, the acme of whose life is in the human brain, while prior and positive as to the momentum of this duplex cosmic structure, is only coincident as to its perpetuity. Neither existed prior to the other in the timic aspect of their co-ordination.

The proximate cause, then, of all the motions of the alchemico-organic cosmos is electro-magnetic substance produced reciprocally at the center and circumference of the great alchemico-organic battery, by the destruction of matter; for let it be reiterated and remembered, that spirit-substance is the result of the destruction of matter as matter; and that matter is the result of the destruction of spirit-substance as such. In other words, an atom of matter is the materialization of physical spirit-substance, and this substance is the dematerialization of matter. Both matter

p. 23

and spirit are substance. It will thus be seen that spirit-substance is not therefore a mere mode of motion or of vibration, but in reality is something in motion.

The Remote Cause of Physical Motion

We have hinted only, in a general way, at the proximate cause of the activities in the alchemico-organic cosmos. The term remote cause is here employed as being a cause remote from the electromagnetic essences upon which immediately depend the form, motions, and phenomena of the cosmic structure outlined in the foregoing. We are now to consider the very central and primary cause of all motion. This cause is mental. Not only is it mental, but it is voluntary and of the will.

There are two cosmic fields of form and function belonging to discrete degrees, but yet co-ordinate and interdependent. These are the alchemico-organic and the organo-vital. The first and lower is that which embraces the world as the earth, with the stars, sun, planets, atmosphere, etc.; the other, the higher, is the vegetable, animal, human, angelic, and God kingdoms. They are both co-eternal; neither existed before the other. The organo-vital is prior as to quality, and prior also as to its positive power to create and perpetuate.

The alchemico-organic field centers in the astral nucleus as the positive pole of its electro-magnetic essence; the organo-vital centers in the divine Man, the bright and morning Star, whence originate the voluntary redemptive will and creative power. The Lord Jesus is the representative nucleus of the regenerated manhood. The Lord Christ at the time of his manifestation was the center of the anthropostic

p. 24

universe, the source of being, the point and origin of creative power.

Cause of Motion From the Biblical and Theological Point of View

“He is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of every creature: for by him were all things created that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: and he is before all things, and by the all things consist; and is the head of the body, the church.” (Col. i:15-18.)

There can be but one question regarding the above Scriptural declaration. Is it true? It is concise; sweeping, inclusive, conclusive, and lucid. Is the Lord Jesus the Christ of God what he declares himself to be, and what inspired men have declared him? Is he the Son of God? And does He embody, as the primary offspring of Deity, all the attributes of the parent? And more than this; in His development from men as the Son of man, did he absorb into himself the principles, attributes, life, form, and consciousness of the parent?

We hold that the Lord, as was declared of him, was the fulness of the Godhead bodily,–Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; and further, that when the Lord was visibly manifest to the outer world, his inner and spiritual life was visible to the spiritual world as the astro-biological center of that sphere, and beside him there was no God.

How could the Lord, being born an infant into the natural world only at the beginning of the age, be the cause of all things? The Lord was not only the reincarnation of Elijah (God the Lord), of Moses, of Abraham, of Noah, of Enoch, and of Adam, in a direct

p. 25

line, but of all who died looking to his coming as the Messiah and Son of God in the indirect lines of reincarnation. He gathered into himself the spirits of the past. He was also the pole of influx from the heavenly worlds, and constituted the rolling together of the heavens as a scroll. He was the Word infolded and sealed. “Him hath God the Father sealed.”

Twenty-four thousand years before the beginning of the Christian age, conditions in the world were the same as then. God was manifest in the flesh, and the Lord of the Christian era was identical with the Adamic personality in the beginning of the 24,000-year cycle. The end and beginning of every grand Zodiacal cycle bring into visible and personal manifestation the Son of God, who is Father, Mother, and Son.

He, the Lord, was the individual or undivided man. He held within himself the Bride, for “He who hath the bride is the bridegroom.” He was the biune, the two-in-one, the parent of himself, and also of the Sons of God. As the parent of Himself, High Father, he was Abram; as the Father of the Sons of God, he was and is Abraham. He being the very primate cause of all things, and possessing both the voluntary and involuntary power of creative being, it is seen that the cause of all things resides in voluntary mental substance, supplemented by the involuntary reflex of voluntary mental activity.

Precession of the Equinoxes as Related to Astro-biological Manifestations

When the ordinary “scientist” alludes to the precession of the equinoxes, he has reference merely to the sun’s precessional movement; but every planet passes through a corresponding precession. The sun’s precessional year is 24,000 years long. The precessional

p. 26

years of the planets are correspondingly longer, proportioned to the difference in their ordinary years. These precessional years constitute cycles of time that are definite and recurrent, and proportionate to the great complex, solar, lunar, planetary, and stellar precessions.

The movements in the alchemic-organic sphere have an astro-biological correspondence. The signs in the physical heavens mark definitely the manifestations which correspond to them in the astro-biologic field. Every 24,000 years there is a similar personal manifestation as the one constituting the beginning of the Christian era. Every 24,000 years there is such a manifestation as is now about to occur.

We are now approaching a great biologic conflagration. Thousands of people will dematerialize, through a biologic electro-magnetic vibration. This will be brought about through the direction of one mind, the only one who has a knowledge of the law of this bio-alchemical transmutation.

The change will be accomplished through the formation of a biological battery, the laws of which are known only to one man. This man is Elijah the Prophet, ordained of God, the Shepherd of the Gentiles. and the central reincarnation of the ages. From this conflagration will spring the Sons of God, the biune offspring of the Lord Jesus, the Christ and Son of God.

The Transposition of Mental Force to Physical “Energy”

When a man (the man) so understands the laws of life as to know their application, and through obedience to law overcomes the sensual tendencies of, his nature, he reaches the point of biologic absorptions The visible and tangible dematerializes, and the outer

p. 27

consciousness enters into unity and blends with the inner and spiritual. The visible man consumes and thus enters, by transabsorption, into the unity of the invisible Godhead, and, by descent, into the church prepared to receive the precipitate afflatus.

In the process of the dissolution of the visible structure, by which the matter of the tangible organism is dissolved, consumed, and reduced to spiritual substance called the Holy Spirit,–the substances (oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon, sulphur, phosphorus, fluorine, chlorine, sodium, calcium, potassium, magnesium, cuprum, aluminum, iron, etc.) contained in the organic structure, together with the atmosphere and the free physical spirit-substances of space, enter the vortex of vibration, which consumes the body.

The consciousness of the man entering thus into the whirlpool of organic dissolution is not obliterated, but infolds by conjunctive unity with the central and interior mind, around which the outer consciousness had wrapped itself. This interior mind constitutes the very central consciousness of Deity, the heart of the anthro-biologic cosmos. Radiating from this afferent absorption, the gravic spirit in its efferent distribution baptizes such minds as are prepared to receive the divine overshadowing, called the Holy Spirit.

Every overshadowing of the primary seven successive baptisms proceeds directly, not from an invisible “oversoul,” but from the tangible personality. The Holy Spirit shed upon the world (the church) in the beginning of the age, proceeded from the visible Lord in his conversion from matter to spirit. If the Lord

p. 28

had not been personal, there could not have obtained the dissolution of his body and its conversion to Holy Spirit; and therefore the afflatus (the “oversoul”) could not have obtained.

But the vortical involution, the anthropostic, took place in alchemico-organic (physical) space; therefore it involved the material elements not included in the organo-vital structure, and the vibrations were communicated to the elements and essences of the alchemico-organic cosmos, converging toward and into the stellar nucleus of the alchemico-organic world, and radiating to its circumferences.

It is thus that the conscious mental nucleus of the anthropostic imparts momentum to the activities of what has been denominated the physical universe. The impulse ceases to be mental substance as soon as the influence of correlation has mutated the vibration of mental substance to the vibration of alchemico-organic (physical) motion.

We do not employ the term vibration as it is usually employed in common psychical or physical “science;” with us, vibration signifies not merely motion imparted to atoms or essences, but the dissolving of molecules and atoms, and their conversion to spirit-substance in the various degrees, and vice versa. It is thus observed that a reciprocal relation exists between the anthro-biologic (organo-vital) and the alchemico-organic worlds, and that the electromagnetic essences active in the latter are the result of a continuous, primary, voluntary mental essence generated in the human mind, dependent on the material basis (brains); these two co-ordinate fields of operation being co-eternal.

p. 29

Cause of Motion of Planetary Disci

There are seven primary, movable, mercurial disci floating between the metallic plates or laminæ. The momentum is imparted through the operation of the actinic radiations from the astral nucleus, projected through the solar influence. These radiations penetrate the geologic, mineral, and metallic strata.

As the sun radiates its substance in the form of a cone, the apex of which is at the solar center, and the base at the metallic strata, the impression made upon the strata is in the form of a circular area. There is an impression of the alternate influence of caloric and cruosic substance, the one expansile, the other contractile. This movement follows the rotation of solar motion, therefore there is necessarily a peristaltic or vermicular motion imparted to the metallic plates or laminæ.

The alternate action of the actinic radiations of calorine and cruosine produces discular vacui between the plates, which are filled with mercurial amalgam. These act as reflectors, throwing back into the heavens the forms of the disci against the atmospheres, so that in looking toward the heavens we behold these disci through the operation of the laws of reflection, and are thus enabled to comprehend how the Lord “spreadeth out the heavens . . . as a molten looking-glass.”

Knowledge of Universal Form Necessary

A knowledge of the structural form and function of the alchemico-organic (physical) cosmos is the key to our knowledge of the principles which must govern the organization of society in the culminating kingdom of righteousness. The importance of a knowledge of

p. 30

universal form and function, as pertaining to the alchemico-organic cosmos, will be admitted when the mind is sufficiently amplified to comprehend the relationship of the alchemico-organic macrocosm to the organo-vital macrocosm (the Grand Man), as pertaining to and comprising the universal mass of human existence.

The individual (undivided) man (such a man was the Lord) is the archetype of creation. What He was in the least form, the alchemico-organic world is in its greatest form; and what he was in that form, so also is the final Theocratic Kingdom in the earth, namely, in the form and function of the man. Therefore, we discover that the true interpretation of the alchemico-organic cosmos is the revelation of the mysteries of Deity; for as the outward and most material structure is but the expressed thought of the voluntary and involuntary mental cause producing it, so a knowledge of this expressed and manifest language reveals the history of human origin and destiny.

[TRUEMODELOFTHEWORLD]

source https://soundtruth.wixsite.com/soundtruth/proof

## Scientific Evidence

Tamarack Mines

In the Fall of 1901 an experiment was being conducted that had never been done, and it would change the way keen observers would view the world forever. In a Michigan mine shaft two cables were hung side by side a mile and a half long, steadied with plumb bobs. Conventional thinking would have it that the bottom of the lines would measure closer together, affirming the common belief that the center of gravity is down and earth is a ball.

To the dismay of chief engineer J.B. Watson, the measurement between the bottom of the lines was farther apart, reaffirming what a four and a half mile geodetic survey discovered less than a decade before - that earth’s surface is spherical concave, not convex.

Rectilineator Geodetic Survey

That’s right. The only geodetic test that’s ever been built to determine the shape of earth’s surface, determined it to be concave. This was called the rectilineator, and it was built by Cyrus Teed, geodeticist Ulysses Morrow and a team, across Naples Beach Florida in 1897. Naysayers excuse this survey as flawed, claiming the beams must have been sagging. These are bold faced lies or extreme denialism, because not only did the team regularly check for sagging beams, the math itself from the survey matched previous distance calculations of earth’s circumference at approximately 25,000 miles. Logically had the test been flawed and the beams sagging, the survey’s math would have calculated a much smaller circumference in error. This is why the rectilineator is absolute conclusive evidence that earth’s surface is spherical concave, not convex. We will soon build another, but this time the results will be Live and worldwide.

The Importance of Demonstrable Science

Tesla said with science there tends to be many deep thinkers yet not so many clear thinkers. This is why demonstrable science is so important to actually learn what it is one is looking at and thus basing their extended ideas upon. Otherwise it’s easy to let the mind run off on ideas that have no basis in a factual starting point.

It isn’t enough to hypothesize, even if there’s a ton of math that goes along with a theory. If something is not demonstrated with real time experiments and observations it might as well be elaborate guesswork backed by fancy words and a wealthy societal authority.

What comes next are more experimental and observational evidences that both disprove heliocentric theory, as well as prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that we live inside a sphere, not on top of one. If you don’t think you can psychologically handle this truth it’s understandable considering the sheer amount of programming we’ve all undergone in being convinced of something hugely unscientific and to be candid, quite ridiculous when one begins to grasp the science we’re going to cover.

How the Seasons Work

Firstly, the biggest and most glaring evidence against heliocentrism, is that if we’re circling a large central sun, and every six months we’re on the opposite side of it, the night sky and star constellations should logically change. It doesn’t. All year round we see the same star globe, because the stars are a celestial, rotating ‘globe’ in the sky. Below is a video diagram showing what is occurring throughout the annual seasons.

05:1807:13

Our Eyes “Lie”, Because Light Bends

A valid question is why then can we not see the inclined curvature, and also how are we witnessing a sun ‘set’ if it’s just going around a celestial sphere in the sky? This is because we are very, very small and this world is very, very big. Also, because light bends.

Yet We Still See the Incline…

Although we do not noticeably see an incline with the naked eye, the distance at which objects can be seen without fog far exceeds what makes logical sense on a ball that dips 8 inches squared per mile. Try this yourself, put 20 miles into the official ‘Earth Curve Calculator’. At 8 feet elevation the ‘target hidden height’ is 182 feet, meaning something like a boat, ship or buoy, even ones that tower over 50 feet high, should be blocked by more than one hundred feet of convex curvature.

This isn’t even close to what we actually see. To the contrary, with newer high zoom cameras people everywhere are recording objects, including land and water lines, dozens of feet raised over the initial horizon line, from 20 plus miles away. This has been excused by mainstream scientists as a “rare superior mirage” called “fata morgana”, however it is typical, not rare or unusual.

(update add on 6/11/21) The definition has even changed since originally posting this years ago; it is no longer defined as “rare and unusual”. The cognitive dissonance has increased in tandem among heliocentric believers, since they are now admitting rare conditions are not causing this ‘phenomenon’.

Sonoluminescence: WHY it’s Concave

The production of light from sound in water was initially discovered in 1934 during sonar work at the University of Cologne. The affect was eventually named ‘sonoluminescence’. The typical sonoluminescence experiment is called a ‘Star in a Jar’, as the affect of the lit up bubble resembles that of a twinkling star. Until this discovery popular science had stars pegged as distant burning nuclear suns in a vast, mostly empty ‘vacuum’ of ‘space’. Oh how quickly things change!

Now the societal authorities don’t know what to tell people, and in the mainstream have just doubled down on fallacies that sonoluminescence brings to surface. Namely that space cannot be a vacuum of empty space, but is in fact water based. The other anomaly that arises from the discovery of light’s creation via sound frequency in water, is how gravity is actually created. The outward permeation of the sonoluminescent bubble naturally pushes impurities in the water against the inside edge, which aligns with previously tested and affirmed assertions that it’s the downward push of aether (from a central point above) that gives us ‘gravity’, not mass.

Magnetic Levitation Experiments

Going back to the importance of demonstrable science over theoretical science, there are zero demonstrable ‘solar system’ experiments that replicate the heliocentric model on which we were sold. The same cannot be said about sonoluminescence and magnetic levitation experiments, which match up with cellular cosmology. Sonoluminescence replicates in small scale an enclosed system from which light is permeated from the center, and even forms into a singular point that resembles our solar sun. Magnetic experiments with a central, levitating sphere - as can be seen in the videos below - demonstrate how a ‘cellular cosmology’ may function in microcosm, whereby the central celestial sphere rotates in between the north and south poles.

High Altitude Observation of Concavity

Prior to the altitude restrictions of hot air balloons after the advent of aviation, in the 19th century air balloonists went one to two miles high. Never since has the human eye observed the earth from this perspective without a window or fish eye camera lens. Can you guess what people were saying about earth’s appearance from that height? The following quotes are testimonies.

“The apparent concavity of the earth as seen from a balloon. – A perfectly-formed circle encompassed the visibly; planisphere beneath, or rather the concavo-sphere it might now be called, for I had attained a height from which the earth assumed a regularly hollowed or concave appearance – an optical illusion which increases as you recede from it. At the greatest elevation I attained, which was about a mile-and-a-half, the appearance of the world around me assumed a shape or form like that which is made by placing two watch glasses together by their edges, the balloon apparently in the central cavity all the time of its flight at that elevation.” – Wise’s Aëronautics

“Another curious effect of the aërial ascent was that the earth, when we were at our greatest altitude, positively appeared concave, looking like a huge dark bowl, rather than the convex sphere such as we naturally expect to see it… The horizon always appears to be on a level with our eye, and seems to rise as we rise, until at length the elevation of the circular boundary line of the sight becomes so marked that the earth assumes the anomalous appearance as we have said of a concave rather than a convex body.” – Mayhew’s Great World of London

“The chief peculiarity of a view from a balloon at a consider-able elevation, was the altitude of the horizon, which remained practically on a level with the eye, at an elevation of two miles, causing the surface of the earth to appear concave instead of convex, and to recede during the rapid ascent, whilst the horizon and the balloon seemed to be stationary.” – London Journal, July 18th, 1857

“I don’t know that I ever hinted heretofore that the aëronaut may well be the most skeptical man about the rotundity of the earth. Philosophy imposes the truth upon us; but the view of the earth from the elevation of a balloon is that of an immense terrestrial basin, the deeper part of which is that directly under one’s feet. As we ascend, the earth beneath us seems to recede–actually to sink away – while the horizon gradually and gracefully lifts a diversified slope, stretching away farther and farther to a line that, at the highest elevation, seems to close with the sky. Thus, upon a clear day, the aëronaut feels as if suspended at about an equal distance between the vast blue oceanic concave above and the equally expanded terrestrial basin below.” – Mr. Elliott, an American balloon aëronaut, in a letter giving an account of his ascension from Baltimore.

“The plane of the earth offers another delusion to the traveler in air, to whom it appears as a concave surface, and who surveys the line of the horizon as an unbroken circle, rising up, in relation to the hollow of the concave hemisphere, like the rim of a shallow inverted watch-glass, to the height of the eye of the observer, how high soever he may be–the blue atmosphere above closing over it like the corresponding hemisphere reversed.” – Glaisher’s Report, in “Leisure Hour,” for May 21, 1864.

Fluid Dynamics

In physics there’s a discipline called fluid dynamics that describes the flow of fluids - liquids and gases. 7 years ago the UCLA Earth and Space Sciences ‘Spinlab’ replicated how swirling vortices in weather systems are formed in an experiment with a stationary table and rotating fluid dispenser, vs a rotating table with a stationary fluid dispenser. The ‘stationary table, rotating fluid dispenser’ example mimicked the way earth’s weather system behaves, with vortices that move across the surface and dissipate. The rotating table example mimicked the way we were shown the planets’ atmospheres’ behave, with consistent ribbons of atmosphere that wrap around, and ongoing vortices that do not move from their relative location. This experiment suggests weather patterns come from a moving sky, in relation to an either stationary or relatively slower moving floor. This discovery is one more feather in the cap for cellular cosmology, and aligns with our own awareness of seeing the sky in motion every day and night, just as it appears.

Light Reflection Dynamics

Last but not least, the reflection of light off of a concave surface differs from a convex surface, insofar as it’s elongated and a bit blotchy, compared to the almost perfect round glint of light that’s seen from a convex surface. On large bodies of water the sun’s reflection is elongated and a bit blotchy, indicating once again the concavity of the surface of our world.

Source Concave Earth – The Cellular Cosmology – Wandal z Wandali

The cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity.

Introduction

To acquire knowledge, one must study; but to acquire wisdom, one must observe.

Secrets in Plain Sight

“The universe is spherical in shape and finite in size. Outside it is infinite void which enables the universe to breathe.”

– Thomas Little Heath, “The Copernicus of Antiquity Aristarchus of Samos” (1920).

(“WSZECHŚWIAT JEST KULISTY W KSZTAŁCIE I SKOŃCZONY W ROZMIARZE. NA JEGO ZEWNĄTRZ JEST NIESKOŃCZONA PUSTKA, KTÓRA UMOŻLIWIA WSZECHŚWIATOWI ODDYCHAĆ.”)

God does not build in straight lines.

They are no straight lines in nature.

“Castles in the air — they are so easy to take refuge in. And so easy to build, too.”

– Henrik Ibsen, “The Master builder“, act 3 (1892)

“What Luck for Rulers that Men do Not Think.”

― Adolf Hitler

“The most dangerous enemy of the truth and freedom amongst us is the compact majority”.

“The majority is never right. Never, I tell you! That’s one of these lies in society that no free and intelligent man can help rebelling against. Who are the people that make up the biggest proportion of the population – the intelligent ones or the fools?”

― Henrik Ibsen, “An Enemy of the People” (1882)

Ancient man’s knowledge of Earth and the universe is encoded in artifacts.

Sacred Geometry

Have you ever wondered?

Horizon

For an observer on the ground of convex Earth with eye level at h = 1.70 m, the horizon is at a distance of 4.7 km. For an observer elevated 100 m, the horizon is at a distance of 35.7 km. In order for the observer to be able to see the horizon at a distance of 100 km, he would have to be at a height of 784 m.

So, how can you explain this?!

WGN TV News**:** Superior “mirage” of Chicago skyline seen from Michigan shoreline.

**

**Is Earth a concave ball or a convex ball?

For better/easier visualization of the horizon phenomena, the scale of sun’s rays to the curvature of Earth is extremely exaggerated.

What would you see from Córdoba Spain, if you could see across the sky of Cell Earth?

“I would rather live my life as if there is a Creator and die to find out there isn’t, than live my life as if there isn’t and die to find out there is.”

Chapters: 1) Under vacuum, light is invisible 2) Bending light explains Moon’s phases as well as the Sun and Moon’s eclipses. 3) Bending Light Proves Concave Earth. 4) The concave Earth system is like an atomic model. 5) A precise, scaled-down model of Earth and the Sun and Moon’s orbits with the exact trajectory of the Sun’s rays. 6) Concave Earth and the universe’s dimensions.

In the absence of matter, or even under partial vacuum, light is invisible.****

Light can only be observed from its original source, or reflected from mirroring (reflecting) object (physical matter) and only if it enters the eye’s retina directly.

The light blue ring above the brown one represents Earth’s day time and atmospheric space located approximately 100km to 120km between sea level and Karman Line (the biblical glass sky).

The blue lines represent Sun light rays which due to light curvature (bending) do not travel below the Karman line, so consequently they are invisible from Earth. This Sun’s light beam, illuminates all physical objects in our cosmos like: Moon, Milky Way and other celestial bodies – The reflected light allows us to observe them mainly on the night sky.

Yellow and Red colors represent light rays which do penetrate thru the Karman line. Because of that, they are visible on Earth and by being reflected from physical objects we can visually experience and enjoy our surrounding world.

Bending Light Proves Concave Earth.

The two Red lines represent Sun rays which are responsible for RAINBOWS (which are occurring only early morning or late afternoon), HALOS and also for the RED Moon phenomena. – To the “scientists” and other “experts”, (so called), all this, is unexplainable physical phenomena.

Concave glass firmament (diverging lens) disperses and refracts sunlight.

****

****The cell Earth system, resembles a so called **“**scientific model of ATOM” – In fact, it is the exact copy of it.

Light geometry.

Light and Lens Characteristics.

The effects of lenses on light’s refraction are a basic principle why life on Earth under a convex firmament (DOME) would be impossible!

The light is bending!

Sunlight is bending upwards. The clouds are illuminated from the bottom up.

How far is the Sun, and how big is it?

How far is the Moon, and how big is it?

Examples of false teaching.

Divine Ratio in Nature.

Magnetic precession rates of the gyromagnetic-ratio at 42.49224 Mhz/T in creating the magnetic vortex. Precessional (vortex) Geometry is also Phi-Phi-1Precession.

The geometry of sunlight’s path encoded in Egyptian artifacts is also found in nature (i.e. flowers and sand dollar shells).

Bending light explains Moon’s phases, Blood Moon as well as the Sun and Moon’s eclipses.

This is a precise, scaled-down model of Earth and the Sun and Moon’s orbits with the exact trajectory of the Sun’s rays.

Solar Halos, Sun Dogs, Rainbows and the lens flare, prove a glass firmament.

**

**Rainbows explained.

Sunlight dispersed and refracted by the glass sky is reflected off rain droplets or clouds as a rainbow.

Halos and Sun Dogs explained.**

— “True ignorance is not the absence of knowledge, but the refusal to acquire it.”

“Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:” Ehesians 4:18

Scientists and Singularities
One of the main driving forces behind the development of science since its creation during the renaissance and reformation periods, has been the attempt to produce complete generality in the formulation of the laws of nature. Until very recent times it was held as an unquestioned belief that ultimately all nature could be reduced to the operation of a few, carefully defined, physical laws of complete generality and universality.

This assumption inevitably led to the mathematical formulation of physical laws as differential equations whose various solutions contained all the possible physical situations. These could be sorted out in particular cases by reference to the particular circumstances, or what are called boundary conditions, for each given situation.

Such a view of the world necessarily entailed the exclusion of all singularities. These included those inexplicable phenomena which did not fit the pristine, general laws and those singular solutions to differential equations which were defined away as “unphysical” or “irrational.”

Since explaining and controlling are closely associated, scientists’ obsession with explaining the world may well indicate an irrational and dangerous compulsion to control everything.

Classical Physics
Classical physics began with Galileo and Newton who regarded the matter of the Heavens as essentially the same as the matter on the Earth’s surface and inside the Earth and therefore subject to the same laws of motion. The guiding maximum of these reductionist scientists was “as below, so above.” This was in direct opposition to the medieval cosmology which had taken from the Greeks the assumption that different laws of motion applied to heavenly bodies as compared with earthly matter.

Like Galileo, Newton abandoned both the geocentric Christian cosmology as a whole metaphysical system and Kepler’s revised “intermediate” metaphysical cosmology. (Kepler had identified the prime mover of the new heliocentric system as both the sun and God the Father, The planets he believed to be the sons of God and the force which the sun exercised over them was the Holy Spirit). Newton therefore desperately needed a fixed frame of reference in which his new laws of motion could operate.

Newton’s Singularity
Newton devised a frame which he called “the absolute frame” which was defined tautologically as that frame in which his laws of motion held perfectly. To give it metaphysical authority he claimed that it corresponded in some undefined way with “the Mind of God.” This was a Unitarian, theistic conceptualisation that differed significantly from Kepler’s mystical Trinitarian approach to metaphysics. Here at the core of Newton’s theory, which emphatically rejected non-universalistic principles in physics, was a great singularity.

The Great Work Continues
In spite of this great metaphysical flaw in classical physical cosmology the eighteenth and nineteenth century scientists pressed blindly on with the great work of reducing the whole complex system of the universe down to a few differential equations. In the course of this programme Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism reduced light and all other electromagnetic phenomena to four equations and Boltzmann, Maxwell and Gibbs reduced all thermodynamic phenomena to statistical principles applied to atoms and molecules.

Einstein’s Singularity
There still remained, however, the problem of reconciling Maxwell’s equations with the absolute space and time of Newton’s cosmology and it was the pursuit of a solution to this problem which led Einstein to propose the theory of special relativity. Einstein founded his theory upon a new absolute, the “Speed of Light”. The speed of light is postulated to be invariant for all observers. However this axiom is an assumption which simply cannot be explained in terms of the theory. It is both an act of faith and a singularity.

The actual value of the speed of light is not assumed by the theory but, more importantly, what is assumed is its invariance under Lorentz transformations. In just the same way Newton had assumed the existence of absolute space and time which were invariant under Galilean transformations. Modern definitions of distance and time based upon the light radiated by certain atomic transitions are closer to actually defining the speed of light than to measuring light or anything else measured by it.

Trying to Eradicate the Centre of the Universe
In general relativity, which is Einstein’s theory of gravitation and cosmology, mathematical singularities emerge very clearly. In particular it is impossible, within general relativity, to remove a singularity of cosmological importance, this is the point at which the big bang of the universe began. Indeed we can once again envisage experiments in which it is possible to measure our absolute velocity relative to this singular point. This great cosmological singularity provides an absolute reference point or centre of the universe which Einstein had tried so hard to eradicate through relativity theory.

In general relativity frames of reference are still invariant under Lorentz transformations only, but a great deal of more theoretical work suggests that any future theory will have frames of reference which are conformally invariant. This is a more general and less restricted way of transforming coordinates than through the Lorentz transformations. The Maxwell equations are already conformally invariant.

The Almighty Equation Replaces Almighty God
The development of physics in this century seems to have been concentrated upon a search for more and more general transformations being applied to less and less particular coordinate systems. This fits in with the original great work of producing equations of increasing generality. However the more general and all-embracing the equations become, in other words the more general the invariance, the more the equations themselves become unique or singular. Almighty God, the monotheistic medieval singularity and prime-mover, is replaced by the almighty equation.

The Inside-Out Model of the Universe
Attempts to widen the descriptive power of the laws of physics have resulted in a narrowing of the range of possibilities for the form of the laws themselves and hence a greater singularity in the laws. It now seems likely that all of the laws of physics can be made into a conformally invariant form. In other words the laws would remain the same when the coordinate system used to describe the whole universe or world system are subjected to a simple conformal transformation. In this conformal transformation, known as inversion geometry, the defined measuring unit for distance is able to change in a regular way from one point to another but angle measurements remain unchanged.

Figure 1: Pictorial representation of the transformation.

A frame of reference is first selected. The one chosen here being the geocentric model with the frame of reference placed with its centre at the centre of the earth. This is an acceptable model within the terms of reference of general relativity. Inversion geometry is then applied to this frame of reference. As a result we obtain a universe which is totally inverted or turned “inside out.”

In the geoperipheral model we perceive ourselves as living on the inside of a sphere, which is the biosphere or surface of the earth, with the ground beneath our feet extending to “infinity” and in the ‘inner space’ above us, inside the earth’s surface, are the sun, moon, planets, galaxies etc…

Immediately the inside-out universe is described, dozens of objections to it are apparent. The well-known phenomenon of the ship disappearing “hull-down” on the horizon; why can’t we in New Zealand see right across to Spain? Where are the sun and the stars, and why are we not burnt up by their heat if they are contained within the hollow earth? The shape of the earth’s shadow on the moon; and so on. These, and a hundred other objections are easily explained in the new model.

Figure 2: This diagram shows the basis of the theory.

The basis of the conformal transformation is illustrated in Fig. 2. If a point A outside a circle is taken at a distance OA from the centre, it is obvious that another point B can be found inside the circle, at a distance OB from the centre, such that (OA) x (OB) is equal to the square of the radius of the circle. The point B is then said to be the geometrical inverse of the point A.

In a similar manner any number of points outside the circle can be transferred to the inside as geometrical inverses, and so lines and figures outside can be transferred inside. Fig. 3 shows how this transformation appears for some simple figures.

Figure 3.

One or two points about the type of field this inversion geometry produces inside the circle are immediately apparent. In the first place it will be seen that for every point outside the circle there is a corresponding point inside, so that the whole of the space outside can be got into the space within the circle. Again, it can be seen that as the point A recedes from the centre, the point B approaches it, but B only reaches the centre when the point A recedes to “infinity”; therefore, the centre is the geometrical inverse of “infinity”.

A further and most important point, which is not at first apparent but follows logically, is that if lines of sight outside the circle are transferred inside, their directions as seen by an observer on the surface are not altered. Thus if we imagine an observer on the outside, i.e. in orthodox space, at the point 3 (Fig. 3), he sees an object A at an angle (theta) above his horizon. His geometrical inverse on the inside sees the geometrical inverse of A at the same angle (theta) from his horizon.

Figure 4 – Explanation of day and night.

In the geoperipheral model the sun and moon both revolve round the co-ordinate centre at an apparently very short distance from it and are considerably diminished in apparent size. The sun revolves around the centre every twenty-four hours with the moon. The moon gains in position relative to the sun and completes an additional orbit each lunar month. The planets have more complicated movements with the outer planets: Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, Uranus and Pluto, revolving around the co-ordinate centre, and the inner planets, Mercury and Venus, revolving round the Sun. These are shown, considerably enlarged for illustrative purposes, in the diagram. Note that the earth’s surface surrounds this system and is located at a considerably greater distance away from the limit edge of the diagram that can be shown on this scale.

Figure 5 – The orbits of the Sun and planets.

It is possible for the apparently small hollow earth to contain these apparently large objects because the distance scale we are using as a measure changes rapidly as we move it towards the centre of the new co-ordinate system. A measuring rod which is moved into the centre would rapidly decrease in size. Hence objects which are measured by this rod still appear to be immensely large.

Figure 6: The “hull-down” phenomenon. View the image upside down for the orthodox theory.

Figure 7 The earth as seen from a space ship in both models

Heaven Reappears in Cosmology
The most interesting aspect of this model is its creation of a single great singularity at the co-ordinate centre near which most of the matter of the universe is concentrated. The apparently most distant parts of the universe are closest to the centre and the distant galaxies, which are moving rapidly away from the surface of the Earth, are all converging upon this central point in inner space.

The adoption of the inverted universe as a model creates a definite centre which can be referred to from all points on or above the Earth’s surface and which is located at the physically “highest” point for all possible observers. Moreover this centre is located in a consistent geometrical position. These qualities are precisely those sought for by pre-scientific metaphysicians when attempting to describe the great supra-mundane singularity referred to by such names as paradise or heaven.

Metaphysical speculation was cut off from physical speculation in the universities by the adoption of the reductionist Newtonian and Einsteinian physical cosmologies. It could be said that the great singularity was “repressed” from consciousness and therefore assumed eccentric and malevolent forms. The obvious failings of the Aristotelian model, modified by Aquinas and other scholastics, have now been corrected without doing violence to the laws of modern physics.

To reconstruct a satisfactory non-fragmented, non-reductionist, and non-eccentric cosmology which includes findings in all fields of intellectual endeavour is without doubt the most important task for the present generation of thinkers.

A start was made in this direction by the Wizard who produced an outline in 1972 which was taught as an experimental, non-accredited, course at the University of Melbourne in 1973, and at the Christchurch Polytechnic in 1975.
In 1997 the Wizard began putting the post-modern cosmology on his web-site.

THE NEXT STEP
Having outlined the nature of this new model of the physical universe and opened it up for discussion, the next step is to outline some of the reasons why this model should be adopted by the human race at this particular time in history.

[TRUEMODELOFTHEWORLD]

Source Inner space translated in English, by thewordwatcher – Concave Earth Research Unbound

# Inner space translated in English, by thewordwatcher

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Since childhood, I have been observing the world, nature, animals, stars and often asked me the questions: ‘Our world is really built as science tells us, we are absolutely alone in this enormous universe, and if so, why and for what such a punishment He met? ‘ These questions have often kept me awake at night, and the fact that no one could reasonably answer them was the one that killed me the most. So I went on the ‘road’, the road to the sources of truth. I have read many books and scientific papers that have made a bold attempt to explain the phenomenon of our existence, creation, and the structure of the
universe. Unfortunately, after reading many of them, I came to the conclusion that they all lead to a dead end, from which you have to turn back as soon as possible and start searching again. And that’s how many years passed to me, until…

In contrast to the Copernican model of the universe, there is much evidence that we are living within the Earth’s galaxy. The theory of the inner cosmos has not existed for a short time, but it was widely known in ancient cultures and nations. There was the state of Sumer in the southern part of Mesopotamia and the Persian Gulf. To this day, it is not known when and from where its inhabitants came – an extraordinary, mysterious people who already had amazing knowledge about space, ahead of modern discoveries – unfortunately ignored by science for centuries, and taken only seriously after sending NASA probes into space in the 1970s that provided the first pictures of planets of the solar system in color – confirming 100% of sumers’ messages.

Many theories have been laughed at and many will laugh at it. But one must finally say with full vigor that: `a few hundred years ago the present model of the universe was created in the minds of astronomers, and is based only on observations from Earth and mathematical calculations, which are only a mathematical model, ie they are relative and do not have to cover at all with reality! ‘. Einstein himself once said: ‘As long as reality is based on mathematics, one can not be sure that it is based on reality’. What does not mean anything but the fact that nature is unpredictable and as long as things are translated by mathematical formulas, definitions of phenomena can not be clearly defined. The mathematical model is only a model that can not be accepted as reality in any case! Unfortunately, many scientists approach this issue very superficially and irresponsibly. They receive some results in their research, and inaccuracies of their research are often unable to explain themselves and to authenticate them, they introduce so-called measurement error. In my humble opinion, this is not a measurement error, it is a conscious distortion of science and misleading people, and often for long, long years!

The internal model of the universe is itself and in itself a great harmony of all processes occurring in nature, which do not need any mathematical models to be able to build and understand it. But the funniest thing is that our world is built in such a way that the laws of physics are equally valid in both cases, which, unfortunately, makes the Copernican mathematical model the basis of all the teachings about the construction of the universe, because it was ‘the first’. All the shortcomings and inaccuracies of the heliocentric model are cleverly covered with complementary theories, and the rest is simply silent.

In the case of the inner cosmos, everything is inverted and closed in a sphere, where the proportions are correspondingly smaller (real), and in the second they go to the dimensions so unimaginable that these are measured in billions of light years. Long ago observed and confirmed by science the fact that the more we move away from the Earth the speed of spacecraft is decreasing, this science is not able to clearly explain this phenomenon. The speed of light in space so far no one could, or did not want to measure, what many things would eventually explain.

The biggest mistake made by science is the belief that the speed of the electromagnetic wave in the vacuum and the resulting physical constant is c = 299792458 m / s. Going deep into the essence of the theory of relativity does not solve this issue, simply confuses the matter and moves away from the main subject.

In order not to be misunderstood, I will add that today’s science does not reject this possibility.
The possible variability of the speed of light can have a considerable cosmological significance, it can be evidence of one or another topology of the Universe, with one or another direction of its development. It can also have a key philosophical significance.

A Russian scientist has investigated that a laser beam pointing vertically into the sky loses much of its speed, and therefore behaves digressively. Why is it silent on this subject, why it is so hard to reach the results of many scientific works that would finally reveal this terrible mistake of astronomers for hundreds of years, which is actually an ordinary mathematical model, created in fallible human heads, completely absent from reality – and which has never been proven and proven in any way, since it is impossible to prove it at the moment.

For me, the Universe is one huge organism that combines energy, not super- separated objects (separation is the main problem of science). The theory of relativity really complicates everything, assuming that the light is slowing down but the observer does not feel it would not be fun with time and space, and the bending of spacetime is interesting, provided that we know the complicated mathematics, which also does not explain anything. Many people say that theories of relativity can be confirmed with great accuracy, everyone agrees, except the Universe itself. Well, but on the basis of unchanging c, we have developed so many “wonderful” theories, such as the theory of relativity.

But human nature is such that if a person attended school, did a high school diploma and then higher education, then from comfort and conformism he does not think about the fact that according to today’s laws of physics, which is proven, the top can not fly, and some years and not one! Many devices work, and according to the laws of physics should not work. Because these devices are created by people with passion and not by knowledge of physics or astronomy and adherence to imposed patterns. For example, if Nikola Tesla did not have these passions and had all the above mentioned negative human traits, probably to this day we would not know alternating current, motors and generators for this current, and many other ingenious, timeless inventions.

In 1000 years, or maybe even earlier, someone will finally prove a long-known truth. Our descendants will look at our learning with pity, just as we do now with the study of the Middle Ages, and the study of the Middle Ages did so with ancient teachings. Or maybe soon the Americans will finally land on the moon and see how small it really is, which is clearly seen in satellite imagery, and that the earth is indeed a sphere, but we are in it! Other planets are also empty inside, and it is possible that their lives contain life and even other civilizations. This would also explain why so far no life forms have been found on other planets. You simply have to look for life in the middle of planets, not outside. As a curiosity I will give you a fact researched by NASA, that the moon is empty inside like an egg shell. It is not inconceivable that the Earth is also part of another galaxy and circulates inside it and its external surface is barren and covered with huge craters, like all other planets that have been ‘explored’ so far. This is probably all built up: the earth and its nucleus circulate in the middle of another planet, this planet again in the middle of another and so into infinity.
What we perceive as stars is the center (core of the galaxy) of our earth system, which we take (mistakenly) for the starry sky. All in all, we can see through the center some light, and maybe even only sunlight, which is piercing through it, bounces.

Famous people like Isaac Newton and Leonhard Euler preferred the theories of empty earth all their lives. Measurements made more than 100 years ago completely confirm this theory, but science does not accept these facts, and even does not allow such a thought to itself. And enough to build a powerful telescope with infrared filters to be able to see from Poland, for example, London or Moscow, and standing on the ground, not on top of the highest tower or mountain! But this fact would certainly be just another challenge for scientists who at all costs tried to prove that this is another phenomenon caused by a reflection of the atmosphere to defend their religion called science and its commandments.

Well, how will science explain, for example, the phenomenon with planes? Why, when they fly at a height of 7 km, from this height visibility from the aircraft should not exceed 296 km, and tests using infrared cameras, showed that the visibility is 532.9 km, although the angle of view from this height it absolutely prevents you from seeing such a large tract of land! The angle of view from this height is almost twice as large as what mathematical calculations show us and says logic. I do not think anyone will say that during the measurements it is the ‘Fata Morgana’ that represents 237 km of land !? Everyone who once played in the calculation of the sphere, and dealt with a bit of optics, can easily calculate it. And this fact is one of the proofs that we live in the middle of the globe, because this visibility is from this height, but only in the middle of the sphere.

The mere translation of the Fata-Morgana phenomenon should give many people a reason to think about its meaning and logic. And it seems that once she shows upside down, but only at small distances, and the latter again realistically and often in lengths up to several hundred kilometers, often lasting a dozen or so hours. Some observations indicate that in Strasbourg the port of Constantinople (Istanbul) was seen with such an amazing precision of detail as if it were a mirror image of a neighbor’s house. How can it be possible that from such a distance of up to 1,866 km, the phenomenon of Fata Morgana takes place, where science tells us that if light falls on an opaque plane, its part is absorbed. The ratio of the reflected stream to the incident stream is called the reflection coefficient. If any surface, at which 100 lm drops, 70 lm is reflected, the reflection coefficient is 0.7 or expressed as a percentage of 70 percent. The remaining 0.3 or 30 percent. it was absorbed. Something here too many of these phenomena undermining the basic laws of optics and other sciences!

Many of you have certainly already been at the sea, in the harbor, and watched the coming ships. Obvious observers certainly did not escape the fact that we see the approaching ships as if the chimneys first emerged from the depths, which would prove the convexity of the Earth and the heliocentric model of the universe. Nothing but the optical illusion, caused by the reflection and refraction of the elliptic light towards the core of the Earth.

In 1897 in the USA, Professor Morrow and Dr. Teed built constructions that aimed to measure the concavity, the bulge of the ocean. So what do you think, what were the measurement results? Here they are: At the length of `only ‘3.8 km the ocean was 1.22 m above the reference point! So the ocean is concave like a bowl of poppy-heads! It is also proved that the light collapses elliptically upwards, resulting in the illusion of a convex earth. When the distance to the ship is large enough, we get the impression that he emerges from the sea and does not come from above, because with the elliptical light the visibility of our eyes is limited to seeing only the upper parts of the ships, where the lower ones are out of
sight. This phenomenon can be calculated using the formula for refraction of
light, taking into account the internal concavity of the sphere at a given distance from the reference point. Calculations and appropriate measurements prove this fact! Did any of you ever wonder if, when standing on the seashore, we are referring to the ‘impression’ of the sea that is much, much higher than the shoreline? If not, I recommend paying special attention to it – which can also be observed on land.

It gives a refraction pattern that helps in proving this theory: b1 = arc (half circle) = 5000m
b2 = circle = 10000m
r = radius of the globe = 6371000m

dh = height difference which the theodolite (geodetic instrument) should indicate when the stream of light is (supposedly) absolutely simple.
X1 = (r / cos (b1 / r)) – r
X2 = (r / cos (b2 / r)) – r

dh = X2-X1

Example:
X1 = (6371000 / cos (5000/6371000)) – 6371000 = 1,962016 m X2 = (6371000 / cos (10000/6371000)) – 6371000 = 7.848070 m dh = 7.848070 – 1.962016
dh = 5.886054 m

As you can see, the stream of light breaks up elliptically! Who still does not believe, let him base the larger numbers for b1 and b2, or borrow from his friends the geodetic instrument with mechanical level regulation (only such are suitable), and he will convince me of my reason. Measurements can be carried out even in a closed room!

Whom is not convinced by all this evidence, I recommend this trip to Lake Constance and taking with me a telephoto lens with a focal length of at least 400 mm, and taking a few photos of the opposite shore, between Friedrichshafen and Romanshorn. For this purpose, it is advisable to set the lens horizontally and take a few photos, while in the middle of the lake a ferry passes. As a reminder, the distance between them in a straight line is about 11 km. According to Copernicus’ theory and a straight line of light rays, a photo taken in such a way should present a ferry in the middle of the lake, and on the other side we should see the tops of trees and higher storeys of buildings. I assure you that it is not! The picture will always be taken and each time we will present a ferry in the middle of the lake, and in the middle of the ferry, above the side, we will see the other shore! Appropriate measurements of the shuttle showed a height difference of up to 2.34 m between the surface of the lake and the point seen in the pictures as the shore! Providing such photos to certain institutions caused the scientists to be amazed and scratching their heads, up to the blood, as well as making the appropriate calculations. Here they are:

Half of the distance between Friedrichshafen and Romanshorn: b = 0.5 * 11 km = 5.5 km.
average radius of the Earth: r = 6371 km Search
altitude: h

h = (r – (r * cos (b / r))) * 1000
h = (6371 km – (6371 km * cos (5.5 km / 6371 km) )) * 1000 h = 2.374 m !!!

These are not any fairy tales for naughty children, it is not making people water from the brain, but the truest truth, because this is the height of our beloved Earth on the arch and at this distance. This is clear evidence of the concavity of the Earth, which scientists ignore, and those who are convinced of its rightfulness, hold the smileys with a padlock, probably in fear of ridiculing themselves against the whole scientific community, and the fear of losing so hard-earned
authority. Who is behind all those who have an interest in lying to humanity? After all, every layman could do such simple measurements and calculations to find out the truth and open the eyes to all doubters.

How long does this farce last, and why?

In 1901, in the ‘Tamarackmine’ mine, two engineers took measurements of the distance between the mine shafts on the surface and underground, at a depth of 1229.4 meters, with the help of risers down to this depth. The distance between the panes under the ground was 975.360 m, and on the surface 974.964 m. Because both of them did not know the internal cosmic theory, convinced of the erroneousness of their measurements, they repeated it repeatedly, but under the supervision of Professor Mc. Nair, who as a great supporter of the Copernican theory had to with a heavy heart and unconditionally recognize these results as real! Similar measurements were also made in other mines and on the highest bridges in the world. These measurements were carried out 100 years ago and are repeated to this day. Each time the result is the same, the Earth is concave and not convex! And what about science? Well, everyone knows. I still remember from school how we were pressed in, that the distances between the panes below ground are always smaller than those on the surface, because our planet is a sphere and we live on its surface. Measurements show but quite another. Who, then, who makes water from the brain and for what purpose?

Everyone has certainly heard about the speed measurements of ships using the so-called logo, which originally had the form of a scaled rope wound up on a turnstile with a wooden block attached to its end. The measurement was done by throwing the block or stern of the block and measuring the speed at which the rope developed. The speed was traditionally measured at the nodes.

Similarly, you can act when measuring the speed of the Earth, but not with the object thrown overboard, but by throwing `the light behind her ‘. It was thought that if the Earth revolves around the Sun, its speed can be measured using special instruments. For this purpose, the Nobel Prize winner Professor Allais made a very precise optical measuring device that was to indicate the speed of the globe with respect to the Sun. The measured speed was 0 km / h! The same applies to the rotation of the Earth around its own axis. Professor Barnet investigated that a metal bar set in a rotary motion becomes magnetic, and so he came to the conclusion that the Earth, which is packed with various metal particles, rotating around its axis at a speed of 1670 km / h, would create such a huge magnetic field, that she should stop after a short time.

The laws of gravitation in the mathematical model of Copernicus also can not be explained logically, only some false assumptions are made, not supported by any sensible scientific facts or evidence, because this phenomenon can not be logically explained, but according to the Copernicus theory. internal galaxies theory for sure. Some say that Earth is attracting us, while others say that it is some unknown force from the cosmos that pushes us to the Earth. Same supposition, no evidence! As the distance to the Sun increases, the force of gravity does not decrease. Note that in further orbits from the sun there are different sized planets and the Sun holds them, not on the basis of universal gravitation, but on the principle of segregation according to the potential, because the larger planets are supposedly again small planets.

In the internal system of the galaxy, the main source of gravity is its nucleus, not the Sun. The center of the galaxy revolves around its own axis, as well as the Sun and the planets around the center of the galaxy – among other things, that’s why we have day and night. It is possible that the Earth revolves around its own axis, but at a speed close to its core, but certainly not with such a crazy speed that science conveys to us. Well, but scientists have to explain to us 24 hours an hour, because as we know the circumference of the Earth on the equator is about 40 thousand km and when we divide it for 24 hours, we will get a speed of about 1667 km / h. So let someone explain to me sensibly what in this case is happening with the centrifugal force? It disappears, it is not simply because physics has come up so that it balances! What strength would have to attract the hill at such a speed. Press us to the Earth so that such huge forces will balance? I will not mention the unimaginable overloads.

As of today, there are alternative theories of pressing by gravitational forces from space, which for thousands of years have been the basis of the theory of the inner galaxy, proclaimed eg by the Sumerians and many other ancient civilizations. The fact that ancient civilizations possessed amazing astronomical knowledge does not necessarily have to remind and prove to anyone.

According to Helmholtz, the energy of strength can neither be produced nor can it be destroyed. Energy and power can only be transformed from one form to another. For example, you can convert potential energy into kinetic or thermal energy, which is much more complicated than it would seem. In other words, we recognize the strength after the body under this force begins to change its speed (because acceleration is a measure of speed change). The greater the force, the faster the speed changes. For example, a large force in a short time disperses a heavy object to high speed. A great force can also stop a great speeding object faster.

In the Copernican model of the universe a certain inaccuracy immediately arises, and it is a force called gravity. For as we know, the phenomenon of gravity is the binder of the Universe – it is the basic force acting between large bodies – especially celestial bodies. It is a universal force, present in any corner of the cosmos. The value of the gravitational pull force acting between two bodies is directly proportional to the product of the masses of interacting bodies and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between their centers. Only that this force must constantly do some work, and without any external influence, which interferes with Helmholtz’s rule at every point. Already Isaac Newton knew this inconsistency, which he could not explain himself. He expressed himself in this way that it was a Divine Breath, who set all planets in motion. In schools, this is not clearly stated, only that this force is simply, it is always constant, it does not change and no one knows where it comes from, I will not mention the invention of gravitons – and here is one big discrepancy .

Certainly many of you will ask: ‘Well, why are the Earth and the satellite imagery clearly seen as a round ball and not as a concave shell?’ good question. Now, please take into account the fact that the rays of light collapse elliptically upwards and run towards the center (core of the Earth), where they concentrate and vice versa – that is, the image that sees the lens from above is actually a reduced image of the Earth due to concentration the rays of light in the elliptical their course inside it – which would mean that the more we move away from it, the smaller we receive it, and looking from Earth to the sky, the nucleus of Earth as the sky in great magnification. Who once was in the planetarium, for sure knows what I am talking about and how it can function more or less.

The very belief that the entire universe was created as a result of the ‘Big Bang’, and then life on our planet as a result of evolution – that’s how the bum did and everything arose – but of course only on Earth and God’s weapon nowhere else, is so great nonsense, I do not have enough words to say its magnitude. For everything that we do not have an explanation for, science will come up with some nonsense, support it with wise patterns, which they often work for years, and then they will permanently enter it into the ‘Bible Bible’, in order to gain fame, publicity, I will not mention financial benefits. And it is these same people who, undoubtedly, possess vast knowledge, use it so cleverly and effectively that they would be able to prove to everyone, everywhere and always, that the triangle is a circle and the sphere is a cube.

Many of you have probably already heard about the drifting of continents, and that they fit together as if in the past they were all one big land, and from all possible sides. A professor (unfortunately I do not remember his name) wondered about this fact and came up with the idea of making an ‘inflatable globe’ with glued continents. The effect of the experiment was such that when there was enough air in it, all the continents, from all sides, formed one large land, and after inflating it, they departed proportionally at distances as we now measure between continents. Would not it explain the fact that our Earth is growing? For centuries, science did not even want to hear about it, and today it is accepted more and more boldly for the generally applicable norm.
It is a fact that the Moon moves away about 4 cm from Earth every year. Has it ever occurred to anyone that the Earth is growing and that is why the Moon inside the Earth is moving away from it?

I have read with great interest many arguments about the growing Earth, where it is presented as a huge, living organism, and that it is built like any living cell. This would explain clearly and logically the fact that the continents are continually moving away from each other, the emergence of life on Earth, and that we live within the Earth, living with her in ‘SYMBIOZA’. Do we not know a similar model from such a disliked object in schools that we call biology?

The issue of the size of the cosmos and intergalactic distances calculated in billions of light years: With the altitude (distance from the earth’s surface) the distances and probably all external dimensions of all bodies decrease, so that approaching the center of this our “universe” the space ship to which we fly it will be smaller and the distance it will travel in a unit of time flying at the same speed, also. It resembles quite a peculiar version of Theory of Relativity, where as it is known, it is not possible to achieve the speed of light, because as you approach this speed, all dimensions of the moving body and its distance to other bodies decrease so that it is not able to reach the speed light. In addition, the passage of time for this body also changes. From a mathematical point of view, it will probably be a sequence converging to the border (in particular to zero) where one meter on the surface of the Earth remains one meter, but the same real one meter near the center of the Earth we can already observe as a billion light years. Which means that the closer to the core of the galaxy, the velocity decreases accordingly, and at the core itself is equal to zero – which is caused by the huge gravitational repulsion of the nucleus. For this reason, getting to the core of the galaxy becomes absolutely impossible! However, the surface of our Earth is almost immobile relative to the core of the Earth, where the Earth’s crust has no gravitational force – but more on that later. The entire mystery of the internal space model is based on the concept of space transformation. All points outside the Earth, let’s move to its center, where all sizes decrease accordingly, and in the center of the Earth form its nucleus. In the same way, all possible laws of physics are transformed into the interior of the Earth’s galaxy. And so the unreal universe and the unimaginable distances and spaces created with the help of mathematics and astronomy, transform into the real world of the inner galaxy, only by adding a tiny, innocent minus against the result of mathematical action, which was inadvertently not set up a few hundred years ago.

The question of the inability to see the other side of the Earth, the concave sphericity of the Earth, sunsets, day and night: All this explains the postulate of some parabolic curvature of light always towards the center of the Earth (up). This means that the Sun, moving at a certain distance from the Earth’s surface, around the center of the Earth, should always be visible (though at various angles) and it should never be at night. This is not the case, however, because at noon, when it is right above our head, everything is normal, then in the morning and in the evening the sun can be seen much lower than it should be at the ground, because the light from it does not fly to us straight line, only turns up. This means that then the light that came out of the Sun in our direction is no longer able to reach us, because it turned into space above us. However, the light that reaches us, came out from the Sun towards the area of the earth much further from us, and closer to the Sun, but turned over the ground so that it reaches us horizontally, which makes us see the Sun at the horizon. This horizontal light also runs into outer space and then we stop to see the sun, because the light that was reaching us horizontally was probably for the obvious reasons, the last one we could see.

The seasons arise because the sun and the planets do not move on a fixed orbit, but on spiral or up and down orbits. It is also possible that it is not the sun, but the axis of the Earth relative to the core of the galaxy that changes its position, but rather it is impossible.

Before you start making fun of this theory, I recommend making a small experiment with a permanent magnet and a lighter, which science knows perfectly but deliberately does not want to answer uncomfortable questions that could have so harmoniously built a mathematical Copernicus model to knock down ruins. Here he is: We hang a magnet on the wire and heat it with a lighter for a few minutes. As we know from experiments in physics lessons, that due to temperature the magnet will completely lose its magnetic properties over time. According to scientific research, the Earth’s magnetic field occurs naturally around the Earth and corresponds approximately to the magnetic dipole field with one magnetic pole near the geographic North Pole and with the other magnetic pole near the South Pole. The line connecting the magnetic poles forms with the axis of the Earth’s rotation an angle of 11.3 degrees. The magnetic field stretches several dozen thousand kilometers from the Earth, and the area in which it occurs is called the Earth’s magnetosphere. Geographers and physicists teach us that there is magma in the Earth’s core, and it escapes volcanoes in the form of liquid lava. The temperature of the lava reaches 1350-1400 degrees Celsius, and its solidification occurs at temperatures of 600-800 degrees Celsius. Now, please answer for yourself a simple question: ‘How is it that in the middle of the earth such high temperatures prevail, and the Earth does not lose its magnetic field, despite the fact that the experiment with a magnet and lighter apparently proves the loss of magnetic properties under the influence of heat? ‘. I’ve heard that science is beginning to change the concept of Earth’s magnetism, and says that the Earth is one great dynamism that is constantly in a rotational motion, where its nucleus rotates but in the opposite direction, creates its magnetic field. Hmmm – as it will be, we will soon find out that we humans are really only biorobots, created by UFOnauts, and our brains are ultra-modern 256-bit biological microchips with ultra-fast memory with a capacity exceeding 5 Yobibyte, which I already had read from Science Fiction publication.

As many of you already know, the Sun is a giant ball of ionized gas, and the temperature of the Sun rises with depth reaching a dozen or so million degrees at the center, at which temperature fusion reactions can occur, but few know that the sun also has enormous magnetic field, which under the influence of such great temperatures does not lose, and should according to the laws of physics commonly known to us. Is it for sure that the sun is built, as science tells us? Or maybe the theory of the inner cosmos is much more reliable than expected?

A much more puzzling is the so-called refraction, reflection, absorption and polarization of radio waves in the ionosphere, which, as we know, ordinary radio waves quite effectively stops. If, however, such a wave would get through some miracle through it, it should disperse somewhere in space, but it is not! If, however, it has already passed somehow through the ionosphere, bounced off something in a vacuum, on the way back it should rebound from it and fly back into space and not to Earth. Radio waves always return to Earth at various time intervals (average 8 / 10sec) as so-called radio echoes. The fact of their existence was proven many times by Professor Stoemer in 1927, which was reported by the scientific world, which, after appropriate experiments, confirmed it 100%. Even suspected, that in our solar system for 12.5 thousand years there are two huge artificial satellites, which were a remnant of extinct highly developed civilizations of Earth, and these were supposed to reflect these waves. But it is not my goal to write a science fiction novel

A few unknown facts to know:

Whoever closely followed the expeditions of space probes to Mars certainly remembers that Mars was repeatedly circumnavigated by them, but absolutely no measurements of its size were made, which would eventually explain many inaccuracies. Why does it look like a lot of billions, but it will not come to anyone’s mind when it comes to accurate Mars measurements? For the relevant queries sent to NASA, it was answered that the dimensions of Mars are already widely known and there is no need for this. After all, this is an irresponsible and unforgivable mistake!
Mars’ photos taken by NASA probes showed a lot of inaccuracies about the proportions of Mars to the Sun.
In addition, the Moon’s study showed that the mountains on the moon, supposedly supposed to have a height of up to 2,000 m, are actually small copies of lunar dust and meteorites! Similarly with the craters on the moon, the proportions are absolutely disagreement – nothing at all! Why, then, will NASA not finally make measurements of the size of the Moon and Mars?
From a 24-hour satellite film made in the 1960s by NASA, it appeared that the movement of planets would be the opposite of the one that we receive from Earth, and the Sun was moving through some strange orbit. The film was accelerated a few years ago on German television. None of the scientists could clearly explain the causes of these anomalous phenomena. And one more thing! During the total lunar eclipse through the lands, the NASA satellite took shots that clearly showed that the moon is brightly lit! How is it? The Earth completely covered the sun! So where did the light, the UFO illuminate the moon?

I realize that after what I have already said and say further – modern luminaries of science will call me ignorant, dilettante and even charlatan. But despite this, I will continue in my conviction based on long-term observations of great scientists, analysis of their work and intuition, and that modern science consciously falsifies reality so effectively that even I have believed in all these nonsense for many years! Fortunately, there is a large group of professors, astrophysicists and many other highly educated and enlightened people who are constantly looking for the truth and will one day reveal it.

I know that thunders from the blue sky will soon be thrown at me, that’s why I am asking critics / commenters about the use of constructive arguments, and an objective look at this theory, not a sense of insulting me only because I am saying a theory incompatible with that which you teachers gave the schools. Taking the position that it must be so and the end, because everyone says so, and who else thinks it in the head and the general laughter in the room, is only a proof of conformism and inability to think. I do not force anyone to believe in this theory, which can not be said about modern science, and attempts to convey my experiences to others are purely informative. I note that the material collected by me and the information contained in it should not serve as official science, and as a generally accepted model of the universe, but give the reader the opportunity to look at some of the “truths” that have been taught to us since childhood. Many will say: it’s fantasy. For now, I wrote only about the facts … fantasy, in the face of what else we discover, it can miss all of us. In order for this theory to be understood, one has to reject many schemes for centuries imposed upon us. There are a lot of unexplained things, but we must not forget that the world was pushed forward not by those who went on the schemas, but also by the very bold theses (Newton, Einstein) who were often considered charlatans, fools and dreamers. In order for this theory to be understood, one has to reject many schemes for centuries imposed upon us. There are a lot of unexplained things, but we must not forget that the world was pushed forward not by those who went on the schemas, but also by the very bold theses (Newton, Einstein) who were often considered charlatans, fools and dreamers. In order for this theory to be understood, one has to reject many schemes for centuries imposed upon us. There are a lot of unexplained things, but we must not forget that the world was pushed forward not by those who went on the schemas, but also by the very bold theses (Newton, Einstein) who were often considered charlatans, fools and dreamers.

In conclusion, I would like to thank you for your attention and announce that all the models of the Universe known to us so far are of indefinite and purely subjective nature and their definitions are as uncertain as any science created by such imperfect human minds. Therefore, all scientific models should be perceived not as a reality in itself, but as models that can be helpful in perceiving it.

As a curiosity, I would like to say that theories include, among others, Germany, Rolf Kepler, descendant of the famous Johannes Kepler, and the theory is based partly on his work, as well as the work of great science authorities, and on my own experiences and observations.

Summary …
So we have two theories. We are inside the earth and the fallen angels are inside or we are outside the earth and Agharta is inhabited by fallen angels and demons. Be able also by the nefilim.

What is shocking – we can not completely reject OBU theory, because in both there is some evidence that confirms both theories.

Rocking inputs can exits outside the Earth. This is not ruled out.

NASA gives us the biggest problem because the Vatican like NASA probably knows exactly what it is like, but it’s hidden from us.

http://www.youtube.com/thewordwatcher http://www.youtube.com/HenryKubik

Księżyc świeci własnym światłem ! - www.zbawieniecom.fora.pl

[TRUEMODELOFTHEWORLD]

Bible verses
Source Die Erde, in der wir leben und der Raum, der die Welt ist

___________________________________________________________

Matthew 6:10

10 Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.

---

Genesis 1:22

22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth .

Genesis 4:12

12 When thou tillest the ground, it shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength; a fugitive and a vagabond shalt thou be in the earth .

Genesis 4:14

14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth ; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.

Genesis 6:4-5

4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

5 And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth , and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

Genesis 6:17

17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die .

Genesis 10:32

32 These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.

1 Chronicles 16:14

14 He is the Lord our God; his judgments are in all the earth .

1 Chronicles 17:8

8 And I have been with thee whithersoever thou hast walked, and have cut off all thine enemies from before thee, and have made thee a name like the name of the great men that are in the earth .

1 Chronicles 17:21

21 And what one nation in the earth is like thy people Israel, whom God went to redeem to be his own people, to make thee a name of greatness and terribleness, by driving out nations from before thy people whom thou hast redeemed out of Egypt?

Job 1:7-8

7 And the Lord said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the Lord, and said, From going to and fro in the earth , and from walking up and down in it .

8 And the Lord said unto Satan, Hast thou considered my servant Job, that there is none like him in the earth , a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth God, and escheweth evil?

Job 38:33

33 Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof in the earth ?

Psalm 8:9

9 O Lord our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the earth !

Psalm 16:3

3 But to the saints that are in the earth , and to the excellent, in whom is all my delight.

Psalm 45:16

16 Instead of thy fathers shall be thy children, whom thou mayest make princes in all the earth .

Psalm 46:8

8 Come, behold the works of the Lord, what desolations he hath made in the earth .

Psalm 58:2

2 Yea, in heart ye work wickedness; ye weigh the violence of your hands in the earth .

Psalm 58:11

11 So that a man shall say, Verily there is a reward for the righteous: verily he is a God that judgeth in the earth .

Psalm 75:31

31 The earth and all the inhabitants thereof are dissolved: I bear up the pillars of it. Selah.

Psalm 113:6

6 Who humbleth himself to behold the things that are in heaven, and in the earth !

Psalm 119:19

19 I am a stranger in the earth : hide not thy commandments from me.

Psalm 135:6

6 Whatsoever the Lord pleased, that did he in heaven, and in earth, in the seas , and all deep places.

Proverbs 11:31

31 Behold, the righteous shall be recompensed in the earth : much more the wicked and the sinner.

Isaiah 12:5

5 Sing unto the Lord; for he hath done excellent things: this is known in all the earth .

Jeremiah 9:24

24 But let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth me, that I am the Lord which exercise lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness, in the earth : for in these things I delight, saith the Lord.

Daniel 4:23

23 And whereas the king saw a watcher and an holy one coming down from heaven, and saying, Hew the tree down, and destroy it; yet leave the stump of the roots thereof in the earth , even with a band of iron and brass, in the tender grass of the field; and let it be wet with the dew of heaven, and let his portion be with the beasts of the field, till seven times pass over him;

Matthew 6:10

10 Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven .

Luke 11:2

2 And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth .

Acts 2:19

2 And I will shew wonders in heaven above, and signs in the earth beneath ; blood, and fire, and vapour of smoke:

Romans 10:18

18 But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth , and their words unto the ends of the world.

Colossians 1:16

16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth , visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:

1 John 5:8

8 And there are three that bear witness in earth , the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

Revelation 5:3

3 And no man in heaven, nor in earth , neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon.

Revelation 12:9

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth , and his angels were cast out with him.

---

Luke 11:2

2 And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth.

---

LG Nils

Johannes 14:6
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.